These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32839037)
1. Direct comparison of reproducibility and reliability in quantitative assessments of burn scar properties. Baumann ME; DeBruler DM; Blackstone BN; Coffey RA; Boyce ST; Supp DM; Bailey JK; Powell HM Burns; 2021 Mar; 47(2):466-478. PubMed ID: 32839037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How to evaluate scar colour after burn injuries - A clinical comparison of the Mexameter® and the subjective scar assessment (POSAS/VSS). Bagheri M; von Kohout M; Fuchs PC; Seyhan H; Stromps JP; Lefering R; Opländer C; Schiefer JL Burns; 2024 Apr; 50(3):691-701. PubMed ID: 38097444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigating the intra- and inter-rater reliability of a panel of subjective and objective burn scar measurement tools. Lee KC; Bamford A; Gardiner F; Agovino A; Ter Horst B; Bishop J; Sitch A; Grover L; Logan A; Moiemen NS Burns; 2019 Sep; 45(6):1311-1324. PubMed ID: 31327551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment of burn hypertrophic scar with fractional ablative laser-assisted drug delivery can decrease levels of hyperpigmentation. Kurup S; Travis TE; Shafy RAE; Shupp JW; Carney BC Lasers Surg Med; 2023 Jul; 55(5):471-479. PubMed ID: 37051876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Scarbase Duo(®): Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and validity of a compact dual scar assessment tool. Fell M; Meirte J; Anthonissen M; Maertens K; Pleat J; Moortgat P Burns; 2016 Mar; 42(2):336-44. PubMed ID: 26774602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictive validity of short term scar quality on final burn scar outcome using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in patients with minor to moderate burn severity. Goei H; van der Vlies CH; Tuinebreijer WE; van Zuijlen PPM; Middelkoop E; van Baar ME Burns; 2017 Jun; 43(4):715-723. PubMed ID: 28040371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of scar assessments performed with an integrated skin testing device - the DermaLab Combo(®). Gankande TU; Duke JM; Danielsen PL; DeJong HM; Wood FM; Wallace HJ Burns; 2014 Dec; 40(8):1521-9. PubMed ID: 24630817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determination of inter-rater reliability in pediatric burn scar assessment using a modified version of the Vancouver Scar Scale. Forbes-Duchart L; Marshall S; Strock A; Cooper JE J Burn Care Res; 2007; 28(3):460-7. PubMed ID: 17438503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A systematic review of the quality of burn scar rating scales for clinical and research use. Tyack Z; Simons M; Spinks A; Wasiak J Burns; 2012 Feb; 38(1):6-18. PubMed ID: 22047828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Burn Scar Evaluation Using the Cutometer® MPA 580 in Comparison to "Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale" and "Vancouver Scar Scale". Busche MN; Thraen AJ; Gohritz A; Rennekampff HO; Vogt PM J Burn Care Res; 2018 Jun; 39(4):516-526. PubMed ID: 29596600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability testing of a new scar assessment tool, Matching Assessment of Scars and Photographs (MAPS). Masters M; McMahon M; Svens B J Burn Care Rehabil; 2005; 26(3):273-84. PubMed ID: 15879752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of tissue ultrasound palpation system (TUPS) in objective scar evaluation. Lau JC; Li-Tsang CW; Zheng YP Burns; 2005 Jun; 31(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 15896506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A modified Vancouver Scar Scale linked with TBSA (mVSS-TBSA): Inter-rater reliability of an innovative burn scar assessment method. Gankande TU; Wood FM; Edgar DW; Duke JM; DeJong HM; Henderson AE; Wallace HJ Burns; 2013 Sep; 39(6):1142-9. PubMed ID: 23433706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinimetric properties of a translated and culturally adapted Norwegian version of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale for use in clinical practice and research. Hjellestad M; Strand LI; Eide GE; Brekke R; Nesheim A; Gjelsvik BEB Burns; 2021 Jun; 47(4):953-960. PubMed ID: 33139075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Values of a Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale to Evaluate the Facial Skin Graft Scar. Chae JK; Kim JH; Kim EJ; Park K Ann Dermatol; 2016 Oct; 28(5):615-623. PubMed ID: 27746642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrasound is a reproducible and valid tool for measuring scar height in children with burn scars: A cross-sectional study of the psychometric properties and utility of the ultrasound and 3D camera. Simons M; Kee EG; Kimble R; Tyack Z Burns; 2017 Aug; 43(5):993-1001. PubMed ID: 28238405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A study of using a simple 2D image analysis method to monitor the surface area of hypertrophic scars on hand during pressure therapy. Yu A; Yick KL; Ng SP; Yip J; Chan YF Burns; 2020 Nov; 46(7):1548-1555. PubMed ID: 32499048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Utility of customized 3D compression mask with pressure sensors on facial burn scars: A single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Hwang SJ; Seo J; Cha JY; Shin H; Kim GS; Cho YM; Hua Z; Youn HS; Seo CH; Joo SY; Cho YS Burns; 2024 Sep; 50(7):1885-1897. PubMed ID: 38937166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measurements of scar properties by SkinFibroMeter Seo SR; Kang NO; Yoon MS; Lee HJ; Kim DH Skin Res Technol; 2017 Aug; 23(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 27796064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]