These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32839134)

  • 1. Micropercutaneous endopyelotomy for the treatment of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.
    Fernández-Bautista B; Parente A; Ortiz R; Burgos L; Angulo JM
    J Pediatr Urol; 2020 Oct; 16(5):687.e1-687.e4. PubMed ID: 32839134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Percutaneous Endopyelotomy over High Pressure Balloon for Recurrent Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children.
    Parente A; Angulo JM; Burgos L; Romero RM; Rivas S; Ortiz R
    J Urol; 2015 Jul; 194(1):184-9. PubMed ID: 25623746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.
    Abdel-Karim AM; Fahmy A; Moussa A; Rashad H; Elbadry M; Badawy H; Hammady A
    J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):401.e1-401.e6. PubMed ID: 27614698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Failed pyeloplasty in children: comparative analysis of retrograde endopyelotomy versus redo pyeloplasty.
    Braga LH; Lorenzo AJ; Skeldon S; Dave S; Bagli DJ; Khoury AE; Pippi Salle JL; Farhat WA
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2571-5; discussion 2575. PubMed ID: 17945304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Ost MC; Kaye JD; Guttman MJ; Lee BR; Smith AD
    Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5 Suppl):47-51. PubMed ID: 16194707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Advance in re-do pyeloplasty for the management of recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after surgery].
    Xiong SW; Wang J; Zhu WJ; Cheng SD; Zhang L; Li XS; Zhou LQ
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Aug; 52(4):794-798. PubMed ID: 32773819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Sundaram CP; Grubb RL; Rehman J; Yan Y; Chen C; Landman J; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2037-40. PubMed ID: 12771713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Our experience on management of failed pediatric pyeloplasty.
    Ceyhan E; Dogan HS; Tekgul S
    Pediatr Surg Int; 2020 Aug; 36(8):971-976. PubMed ID: 32542506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcomes of endopyelotomy for pelviureteric junction obstruction in the paediatric population: A systematic review.
    Corbett HJ; Mullassery D
    J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Dec; 11(6):328-36. PubMed ID: 26553288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of percutaneous endopyelotomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Rukin NJ; Ashdown DA; Patel P; Liu S
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2007 Mar; 89(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 17346411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The management of secondary pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction - a comparison of pyeloplasty and endopyelotomy.
    Vannahme M; Mathur S; Davenport K; Timoney AG; Keeley FX
    BJU Int; 2014 Jan; 113(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 24053370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hydronephrosis: Comparison of extrinsic vessel versus intrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction groups and a plea against the vascular hitch procedure.
    Menon P; Rao KL; Sodhi KS; Bhattacharya A; Saxena AK; Mittal BR
    J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):80.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25794866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Failed pyeloplasty in children: Is robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair feasible?
    Asensio M; Gander R; Royo GF; Lloret J
    J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):69.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25791423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Percutaneous endopyelotomy with electrocautery: modified techniques in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in a child under 2 years.
    Parente A; Angulo JM; Rivas S; Romero RM; Corona C; Tardaguila A
    Arch Esp Urol; 2012 Nov; 65(9):837-40. PubMed ID: 23154609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variation in the Use of Open Pyeloplasty, Minimally Invasive Pyeloplasty, and Endopyelotomy for the Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Adults.
    Jacobs BL; Lai JC; Seelam R; Hanley JM; Wolf JS; Hollenbeck BK; Hollingsworth JM; Dick AW; Setodji CM; Saigal CS
    J Endourol; 2017 Feb; 31(2):210-215. PubMed ID: 27936909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pediatric endopyelotomy: the Washington University experience.
    Figenshau RS; Clayman RV; Colberg JW; Coplen DE; Soble JJ; Manley CB
    J Urol; 1996 Dec; 156(6):2025-30. PubMed ID: 8911382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Percutaneous endopyelotomy in infants and young children after failed open pyeloplasty.
    Faerber GJ; Ritchey ML; Bloom DA
    J Urol; 1995 Oct; 154(4):1495-7. PubMed ID: 7658575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost Analysis of Treatments for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.
    Jacobs BL; Seelam R; Lai JC; Hanley JM; Wolf JS; Hollenbeck BK; Hollingsworth JM; Dick AW; Setodji CM; Saigal CS
    J Endourol; 2017 Feb; 31(2):204-209. PubMed ID: 27927021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endopyelotomy for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a review of our 25-year experience.
    Kim EH; Tanagho YS; Traxel EJ; Austin PF; Figenshau RS; Coplen DE
    J Urol; 2012 Oct; 188(4 Suppl):1628-33. PubMed ID: 22906656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Percutaneous endopyelotomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Okumura A; Fuse H; Tsuritani S; Nozaki T
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2002; 34(4):453-6. PubMed ID: 14577483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.