These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32839275)

  • 21. Clinical Utility of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Domain Scales.
    Lapin B; Thompson NR; Schuster A; Katzan IL
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2019 Jan; 12(1):e004753. PubMed ID: 30587028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.
    Allen D; Gillen E; Rixson L
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2009; 7(3):80-129. PubMed ID: 27820426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Disease-specific health related quality of life patient reported outcome measures in Genodermatoses: a systematic review and critical evaluation.
    Frew JW; Davidson M; Murrell DF
    Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2017 Dec; 12(1):189. PubMed ID: 29284525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of minimal important differences for generic multiattribute utility instruments.
    Henson GJ; Taylor BV; van der Mei I; Claflin SB; Simpson-Yap S; Palmer AJ; Xia Q; Antony B; Singh A; Campbell JA
    BMJ Open; 2022 Oct; 12(10):e062703. PubMed ID: 36283751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Minimally important differences for interpreting European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of life Questionnaire core 30 scores in patients with ovarian cancer.
    Musoro JZ; Coens C; Greimel E; King MT; Sprangers MAG; Nordin A; van Dorst EBL; Groenvold M; Cocks K; Velikova G; Flechtner HH; Bottomley A;
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Nov; 159(2):515-521. PubMed ID: 32972782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Estimating minimal important differences for several scales assessing function and quality of life in patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    Hodgkins P; Lloyd A; Erder MH; Setyawan J; Weiss MD; Sasané R; Nafees B
    CNS Spectr; 2017 Feb; 22(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 27535815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Presentation approaches for enhancing interpretability of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in meta-analysis: a protocol for a systematic survey of Cochrane reviews.
    Devji T; Johnston BC; Patrick DL; Bhandari M; Thabane L; Guyatt GH
    BMJ Open; 2017 Sep; 7(9):e017138. PubMed ID: 28963296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Gender-Affirming Care Worldwide: A Systematic Review.
    Kamran R; Jackman L; Chan C; Suk Y; Jacklin C; Deck E; Wietek N; Stepney M; Harrison C; Jain A; Rodrigues J
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Apr; 6(4):e236425. PubMed ID: 37010869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Carotid Artery Revascularization: Systematic Review and Psychometric Analysis.
    Essat M; Aber A; Phillips P; Poku E; Woods HB; Howard A; Palfreyman S; Kaltenthaler E; Jones G; Michaels J
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2018 Jul; 50():275-283. PubMed ID: 29501592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Minimal important differences of the SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire following surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis.
    Bagó J; Pérez-Grueso FJ; Les E; Hernández P; Pellisé F
    Eur Spine J; 2009 Dec; 18(12):1898-904. PubMed ID: 19533179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Substantial Inconsistency and Variability Exists Among Minimum Clinically Important Differences for Shoulder Arthroplasty Outcomes: A Systematic Review.
    Kolin DA; Moverman MA; Pagani NR; Puzzitiello RN; Dubin J; Menendez ME; Jawa A; Kirsch JM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Jul; 480(7):1371-1383. PubMed ID: 35302970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Minimally important differences were estimated for six Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Cancer scales in advanced-stage cancer patients.
    Yost KJ; Eton DT; Garcia SF; Cella D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 May; 64(5):507-16. PubMed ID: 21447427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Presentation approaches for enhancing interpretability of patient-reported outcomes in meta-analyses: a systematic survey of Cochrane reviews.
    Zeng L; Yao L; Wang Y; Han MA; Granholm A; Nampo F; Tadayon B; Ni X; Zhang L; Devji T; Guyatt G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jun; 158():119-126. PubMed ID: 37028685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Patient-reported outcome measures for adult chronic rhinosinusitis: A systematic review and quality assessment.
    Rudmik L; Hopkins C; Peters A; Smith TL; Schlosser RJ; Soler ZM
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2015 Dec; 136(6):1532-1540.e2. PubMed ID: 26654198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Graft-versus-Host Disease.
    Kilgour JM; Wali G; Gibbons E; Scherwath A; Barata Badiella A; Peniket A; Schoemans H; Matin RN;
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2020 May; 26(5):e113-e127. PubMed ID: 32028026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Cardiovascular Disease: An Evidence Map of the Psychometric Properties of Health Status Instruments.
    Chew DS; Whitelaw S; Vaduganathan M; Mark DB; Van Spall HGC
    Ann Intern Med; 2022 Oct; 175(10):1431-1439. PubMed ID: 36122377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. What Are the Minimal and Substantial Improvements in the HOOS and KOOS and JR Versions After Total Joint Replacement?
    Lyman S; Lee YY; McLawhorn AS; Islam W; MacLean CH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Dec; 476(12):2432-2441. PubMed ID: 30179951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Establishing Minimal Important Differences for the VR-12 and SANE Scores in Patients Following Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tears.
    Zhou L; Natarajan M; Miller BS; Gagnier JJ
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2018 Jul; 6(7):2325967118782159. PubMed ID: 30090834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluating the development, woman-centricity and psychometric properties of maternity patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs): A systematic review protocol.
    Bull C; Teede H; Carrandi L; Rigney A; Cusack S; Callander E
    BMJ Open; 2022 Feb; 12(2):e058952. PubMed ID: 35144957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Methodological quality of dignity-related patient reported outcome measures used in acute hospital settings: A systematic review using the COSMIN methodology.
    Fuseini AG; Redley B; Rawson H; Ley L; Kerr D
    J Clin Nurs; 2023 Aug; 32(15-16):4249-4264. PubMed ID: 36604845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.