These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32839933)

  • 1. The Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a New Mating Effort Questionnaire.
    Albert G; Richardson GB; Arnocky S; Senveli Z; Hodges-Simeon CR
    Arch Sex Behav; 2021 Feb; 50(2):511-530. PubMed ID: 32839933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validating the Revised Mating Effort Questionnaire.
    Albert G; Davis A; Bird BM; Arnocky S; Hlay JK; McGee N; Richardson GB; Hodges-Simeon CR
    Arch Sex Behav; 2024 Jun; 53(6):2091-2109. PubMed ID: 38478164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Psychometric Evaluation of the Intrasexual Competition Scale.
    Albert G; Richardson GB; Arnocky S; Bird BM; Fisher M; Hlay JK; McHale TS; Hodges-Simeon CR
    Arch Sex Behav; 2022 Aug; 51(6):2741-2758. PubMed ID: 35022911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intra-sex Variation in Human Mating Strategies: Different People, Different Tactics.
    Castro FN; Hattori WT; de Araújo Lopes F
    Arch Sex Behav; 2015 Aug; 44(6):1729-36. PubMed ID: 25896490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychometric Evaluation and Cultural Correlates of the Mate Retention Inventory-Short Form (MRI-SF) in Iran.
    Atari M; Barbaro N; Shackelford TK; Chegeni R
    Evol Psychol; 2017 Jan; 15(1):1474704917695267. PubMed ID: 28248556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intrasexual competition mediates the relationship between men's testosterone and mate retention behavior.
    Arnocky S; Albert G; Carré JM; Ortiz TL
    Physiol Behav; 2018 Mar; 186():73-78. PubMed ID: 29337207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are mating strategies and mating tactics independent constructs?
    Allen JS; Bailey KG
    J Sex Res; 2007 Aug; 44(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 17879165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sexual Modes Questionnaire (SMQ): Translation and Psychometric Properties of the Italian Version of the Automatic Thought Scale.
    Nimbi FM; Tripodi F; Simonelli C; Nobre P
    J Sex Med; 2018 Mar; 15(3):396-409. PubMed ID: 29396023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What's in a kiss? The effect of romantic kissing on mating desirability.
    Wlodarski R; Dunbar RI
    Evol Psychol; 2014 Mar; 12(1):178-99. PubMed ID: 25299759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Beyond global sociosexual orientations: a more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships.
    Penke L; Asendorpf JB
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Nov; 95(5):1113-35. PubMed ID: 18954197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of Long-Term Mate Preferences in Iran.
    Atari M
    Evol Psychol; 2017; 15(2):1474704917702459. PubMed ID: 28401792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Individual differences in preference for risky behaviors during courtship.
    Prokop P; Pazda A
    Scand J Psychol; 2020 Aug; 61(4):560-564. PubMed ID: 32103513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Resistance to mate guarding scale in women: psychometric properties.
    Cousins AJ; Fugère MA; Riggs ML
    Evol Psychol; 2015 Feb; 13(1):106-28. PubMed ID: 25647785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monogamy versus Consensual Non-Monogamy: Alternative Approaches to Pursuing a Strategically Pluralistic Mating Strategy.
    Mogilski JK; Memering SL; Welling LL; Shackelford TK
    Arch Sex Behav; 2017 Feb; 46(2):407-417. PubMed ID: 26679305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Examining the possible functions of kissing in romantic relationships.
    Wlodarski R; Dunbar RI
    Arch Sex Behav; 2013 Nov; 42(8):1415-23. PubMed ID: 24114390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Finding the Mating Gear: The Development and Validation of a Mate Access Scale.
    Walldén C; Westerlund M; Gunst A; Santtila P; Antfolk J
    Evol Psychol; 2020; 18(3):1474704920935583. PubMed ID: 32633132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mating Performance: Assessing Flirting Skills, Mate Signal-Detection Ability, and Shyness Effects.
    Apostolou M; Papadopoulou I; Christofi M; Vrontis D
    Evol Psychol; 2019; 17(3):1474704919872416. PubMed ID: 31542947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychometric Properties of the Sexual Excitation/Sexual Inhibition Inventory for Women in a German Sample.
    Velten J; Scholten S; Graham CA; Margraf J
    Arch Sex Behav; 2016 Feb; 45(2):303-14. PubMed ID: 26025455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dyadic invariance of the Adult Self-Report and Adult Behavior Checklist: Evidence from young adult romantic couples.
    DeLuca HK; Sorgente A; van Dulmen MHM
    Psychol Assess; 2019 Feb; 31(2):192-209. PubMed ID: 30359049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Brief Self-Report Scales Assessing Life History Dimensions of Mating and Parenting Effort.
    Kruger DJ
    Evol Psychol; 2017 Jan; 15(1):1474704916673840. PubMed ID: 28152624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.