These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32840175)

  • 1. No Influence of Musicianship on the Effect of Contralateral Stimulation on Frequency Selectivity.
    Tarnowska E; Wicher A; Moore BCJ
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520939776. PubMed ID: 32840175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. No Effect of Musical Training on Frequency Selectivity Estimated Using Three Methods.
    Moore BCJ; Wan J; Varathanathan A; Naddell S; Baer T
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519841980. PubMed ID: 31081487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the Relationship Between Musicianship and Contralateral Suppression of Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions.
    Stuart A; Daughtrey ER
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Apr; 27(4):333-44. PubMed ID: 27115243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of activation of the efferent system on psychophysical tuning curves as a function of signal frequency.
    Vinay ; Moore BC
    Hear Res; 2008 Jun; 240(1-2):93-101. PubMed ID: 18440738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychophysical auditory filter estimates reveal sharper cochlear tuning in musicians.
    Bidelman GM; Schug JM; Jennings SG; Bhagat SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jul; 136(1):EL33-9. PubMed ID: 24993235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Musical experience sharpens human cochlear tuning.
    Bidelman GM; Nelms C; Bhagat SP
    Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():40-46. PubMed ID: 26900073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of efferent acoustic reflex activation on psychoacoustical tuning curves in humans.
    Quaranta N; Scaringi A; Nahum S; Quaranta A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 May; 125(5):520-3. PubMed ID: 16092544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of broadband and narrowband contralateral noise on psychophysical tuning curves and otoacoustic emissions.
    Wicher A; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 May; 135(5):2931-41. PubMed ID: 24815273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of Musical Experience on Cochlear Frequency Resolution: An Estimation of PTCs, DLF and SOAEs.
    Kakar K; Bhat JP; Thontadarya S
    J Int Adv Otol; 2021 Jul; 17(4):313-318. PubMed ID: 34309551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contralateral efferent reflex effects on threshold and suprathreshold psychoacoustical tuning curves at low and high frequencies.
    Aguilar E; Eustaquio-Martin A; Lopez-Poveda EA
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Jun; 14(3):341-57. PubMed ID: 23423559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contralateral efferent regulation of human cochlear tuning: behavioural observations and computer model simulations.
    Lopez-Poveda EA; Aguilar E; Johannesen PT; Eustaquio-Martín A
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():47-54. PubMed ID: 23716208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychophysical correlates of contralateral efferent suppression. I. The role of the medial olivocochlear system in "central masking" in nonhuman primates.
    Smith DW; Turner DA; Henson MM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Feb; 107(2):933-41. PubMed ID: 10687702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of psychophysical tuning curves to explore dead regions in the cochlea.
    Moore BC; Alcántara JI
    Ear Hear; 2001 Aug; 22(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 11527034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequency tuning curves derived from auditory steady state evoked potentials: a proof-of-concept study.
    Markessis E; Poncelet L; Colin C; Coppens A; Hoonhorst I; Kadhim H; Deltenre P
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 19125026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frequency Tuning of the Efferent Effect on Cochlear Gain in Humans.
    Drga V; Plack CJ; Yasin I
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():477-484. PubMed ID: 27080689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for normally hearing subjects.
    Kluk K; Moore BC
    Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 194(1-2):118-34. PubMed ID: 15276683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of a fast method for determining psychophysical tuning curves.
    Sek A; Alcántara J; Moore BC; Kluk K; Wicher A
    Int J Audiol; 2005 Jul; 44(7):408-20. PubMed ID: 16136791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychophysical tuning curves at very high frequencies.
    Yasin I; Plack CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Oct; 118(4):2498-506. PubMed ID: 16266170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal effects in masking and their influence on psychophysical tuning curves.
    Bacon SP; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Dec; 80(6):1638-45. PubMed ID: 3794069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of changes in absolute signal level on psychophysical tuning curves in quiet and noise in patas monkeys.
    Smith DW; Moody DB; Stebbins WC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jul; 82(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 3624642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.