261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32840811)
1. Nanocomposite Clay-Based Bioinks for Skeletal Tissue Engineering.
Cidonio G; Glinka M; Kim YH; Dawson JI; Oreffo ROC
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2147():63-72. PubMed ID: 32840811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 3D-bioprinted functional and biomimetic hydrogel scaffolds incorporated with nanosilicates to promote bone healing in rat calvarial defect model.
Liu B; Li J; Lei X; Cheng P; Song Y; Gao Y; Hu J; Wang C; Zhang S; Li D; Wu H; Sang H; Bi L; Pei G
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2020 Jul; 112():110905. PubMed ID: 32409059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of a clay based bioink for 3D cell printing for skeletal application.
Ahlfeld T; Cidonio G; Kilian D; Duin S; Akkineni AR; Dawson JI; Yang S; Lode A; Oreffo ROC; Gelinsky M
Biofabrication; 2017 Jul; 9(3):034103. PubMed ID: 28691691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hybrid biofabrication of 3D osteoconductive constructs comprising Mg-based nanocomposites and cell-laden bioinks for bone repair.
Alcala-Orozco CR; Mutreja I; Cui X; Hooper GJ; Lim KS; Woodfield TBF
Bone; 2022 Jan; 154():116198. PubMed ID: 34534709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Egg white improves the biological properties of an alginate-methylcellulose bioink for 3D bioprinting of volumetric bone constructs.
Liu S; Kilian D; Ahlfeld T; Hu Q; Gelinsky M
Biofabrication; 2023 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 36735961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nanoclay-based 3D printed scaffolds promote vascular ingrowth ex vivo and generate bone mineral tissue in vitro and in vivo.
Cidonio G; Glinka M; Kim YH; Kanczler JM; Lanham SA; Ahlfeld T; Lode A; Dawson JI; Gelinsky M; Oreffo ROC
Biofabrication; 2020 May; 12(3):035010. PubMed ID: 32259804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Advanced Bioinks for 3D Printing: A Materials Science Perspective.
Chimene D; Lennox KK; Kaunas RR; Gaharwar AK
Ann Biomed Eng; 2016 Jun; 44(6):2090-102. PubMed ID: 27184494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A bioink blend for rotary 3D bioprinting tissue engineered small-diameter vascular constructs.
Freeman S; Ramos R; Alexis Chando P; Zhou L; Reeser K; Jin S; Soman P; Ye K
Acta Biomater; 2019 Sep; 95():152-164. PubMed ID: 31271883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Collagen-based bioinks for hard tissue engineering applications: a comprehensive review.
Marques CF; Diogo GS; Pina S; Oliveira JM; Silva TH; Reis RL
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2019 Mar; 30(3):32. PubMed ID: 30840132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bioprinting a Synthetic Smectic Clay for Orthopedic Applications.
Afewerki S; Magalhães LSSM; Silva ADR; Stocco TD; Silva Filho EC; Marciano FR; Lobo AO
Adv Healthc Mater; 2019 Jul; 8(13):e1900158. PubMed ID: 30957992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Thermo-Responsive Nanocomposite Bioink with Growth-Factor Holding and its Application to Bone Regeneration.
Kim J; Choi HS; Kim YM; Song SC
Small; 2023 Mar; 19(9):e2203464. PubMed ID: 36526612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Osteogenic and angiogenic tissue formation in high fidelity nanocomposite Laponite-gelatin bioinks.
Cidonio G; Alcala-Orozco CR; Lim KS; Glinka M; Mutreja I; Kim YH; Dawson JI; Woodfield TBF; Oreffo ROC
Biofabrication; 2019 Jun; 11(3):035027. PubMed ID: 30991370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Post-decellularized printing of cartilage extracellular matrix: distinction between biomaterial ink and bioink.
Mokhtarinia K; Masaeli E
Biomater Sci; 2023 Mar; 11(7):2317-2329. PubMed ID: 36751955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Employing PEG crosslinkers to optimize cell viability in gel phase bioinks and tailor post printing mechanical properties.
Rutz AL; Gargus ES; Hyland KE; Lewis PL; Setty A; Burghardt WR; Shah RN
Acta Biomater; 2019 Nov; 99():121-132. PubMed ID: 31539655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hydrogel Bioink Reinforcement for Additive Manufacturing: A Focused Review of Emerging Strategies.
Chimene D; Kaunas R; Gaharwar AK
Adv Mater; 2020 Jan; 32(1):e1902026. PubMed ID: 31599073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Graphene oxide/alginate composites as novel bioinks for three-dimensional mesenchymal stem cell printing and bone regeneration applications.
Choe G; Oh S; Seok JM; Park SA; Lee JY
Nanoscale; 2019 Dec; 11(48):23275-23285. PubMed ID: 31782460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A multimaterial bioink method for 3D printing tunable, cell-compatible hydrogels.
Rutz AL; Hyland KE; Jakus AE; Burghardt WR; Shah RN
Adv Mater; 2015 Mar; 27(9):1607-14. PubMed ID: 25641220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nanocomposite bioinks for 3D bioprinting.
Cai Y; Chang SY; Gan SW; Ma S; Lu WF; Yen CC
Acta Biomater; 2022 Oct; 151():45-69. PubMed ID: 35970479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nanocomposite bioink exploits dynamic covalent bonds between nanoparticles and polysaccharides for precision bioprinting.
Lee M; Bae K; Levinson C; Zenobi-Wong M
Biofabrication; 2020 Mar; 12(2):025025. PubMed ID: 32078578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Collagen/bioceramic-based composite bioink to fabricate a porous 3D hASCs-laden structure for bone tissue regeneration.
Kim W; Kim G
Biofabrication; 2019 Nov; 12(1):015007. PubMed ID: 31509811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
