These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32841318)

  • 1. Comparing the prioritization of items and feature-dimensions in visual working memory.
    Hajonides JE; van Ede F; Stokes MG; Nobre AC
    J Vis; 2020 Aug; 20(8):25. PubMed ID: 32841318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distinct prioritization of visual working memory representations for search and for recall.
    Dube B; Al-Aidroos N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1253-1261. PubMed ID: 30644056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory.
    Dube B; Lumsden A; Al-Aidroos N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):641-646. PubMed ID: 30276638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Invalid retro-cues can eliminate the retro-cue benefit: Evidence for a hybridized account.
    Gözenman F; Tanoue RT; Metoyer T; Berryhill ME
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Oct; 40(5):1748-54. PubMed ID: 25045904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Manipulating the focus of attention in working memory: Evidence for a protection of multiple items against perceptual interference.
    Barth A; Schneider D
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13062. PubMed ID: 29315628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Getting more from visual working memory: Retro-cues enhance retrieval and protect from visual interference.
    Souza AS; Rerko L; Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jun; 42(6):890-910. PubMed ID: 26752731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retro-dimension-cue benefit in visual working memory.
    Ye C; Hu Z; Ristaniemi T; Gendron M; Liu Q
    Sci Rep; 2016 Oct; 6():35573. PubMed ID: 27774983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selection within working memory based on a color retro-cue modulates alpha oscillations.
    Poch C; Capilla A; Hinojosa JA; Campo P
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Nov; 106():133-137. PubMed ID: 28958909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Neural Consequences of Attentional Prioritization of Internal Representations in Visual Working Memory.
    Sahan MI; Sheldon AD; Postle BR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 May; 32(5):917-944. PubMed ID: 31851592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Task-dependent effects of voluntary space-based and involuntary feature-based attention on visual working memory.
    Qian J; Zhang K; Lei Q; Han Y; Li W
    Psychol Res; 2020 Jul; 84(5):1304-1319. PubMed ID: 30840142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the robustness of feature-based selection in visual working memory.
    Arnicane A; Souza AS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 May; 47(5):731-758. PubMed ID: 34264730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of attentional selection on working memory for depth in a retro-cueing paradigm.
    Li Z; Tong M; Chen S; Qian J
    Mem Cognit; 2021 May; 49(4):747-757. PubMed ID: 33415712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retrospective attention enhances visual working memory in the young but not the old: an ERP study.
    Duarte A; Hearons P; Jiang Y; Delvin MC; Newsome RN; Verhaeghen P
    Psychophysiology; 2013 May; 50(5):465-76. PubMed ID: 23445536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A neural model of retrospective attention in visual working memory.
    Bays PM; Taylor R
    Cogn Psychol; 2018 Feb; 100():43-52. PubMed ID: 29272732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feature-based and spatial attentional selection in visual working memory.
    Heuer A; Schubö A
    Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):621-32. PubMed ID: 26754949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The lasting memory enhancements of retrospective attention.
    Reaves S; Strunk J; Phillips S; Verhaeghen P; Duarte A
    Brain Res; 2016 Jul; 1642():226-237. PubMed ID: 27038756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the fate of non-cued mental representations in visuo-spatial working memory: Evidence by a retro-cuing paradigm.
    Schneider D; Mertes C; Wascher E
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 293():114-24. PubMed ID: 26196953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Directed avoidance and its effect on visual working memory.
    Williams RS; Pratt J; Ferber S
    Cognition; 2020 Aug; 201():104277. PubMed ID: 32276234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attention and memory protection: Interactions between retrospective attention cueing and interference.
    Makovski T; Pertzov Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(9):1735-43. PubMed ID: 25980784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Working memory prioritization impacts neural recovery from distraction.
    Mallett R; Lewis-Peacock JA
    Cortex; 2019 Dec; 121():225-238. PubMed ID: 31629945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.