These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32844338)

  • 1. Can corrections spread misinformation to new audiences? Testing for the elusive familiarity backfire effect.
    Ecker UKH; Lewandowsky S; Chadwick M
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Aug; 5(1):41. PubMed ID: 32844338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Examining the replicability of backfire effects after standalone corrections.
    Prike T; Blackley P; Swire-Thompson B; Ecker UKH
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2023 Jul; 8(1):39. PubMed ID: 37395864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correcting vaccine misinformation: A failure to replicate familiarity or fear-driven backfire effects.
    Ecker UKH; Sharkey CXM; Swire-Thompson B
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0281140. PubMed ID: 37043493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Listening to Misinformation while Driving: Cognitive Load and the Effectiveness of (Repeated) Corrections.
    Sanderson JA; Bowden V; Swire-Thompson B; Lewandowsky S; Ecker UKH
    J Appl Res Mem Cogn; 2023 Sep; 12(3):325-334. PubMed ID: 37829768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The backfire effect after correcting misinformation is strongly associated with reliability.
    Swire-Thompson B; Miklaucic N; Wihbey JP; Lazer D; DeGutis J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Jul; 151(7):1655-1665. PubMed ID: 35130012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effectiveness of short-format refutational fact-checks.
    Ecker UKH; O'Reilly Z; Reid JS; Chang EP
    Br J Psychol; 2020 Feb; 111(1):36-54. PubMed ID: 30825195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. You don't have to tell a story! A registered report testing the effectiveness of narrative versus non-narrative misinformation corrections.
    Ecker UKH; Butler LH; Hamby A
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Dec; 5(1):64. PubMed ID: 33300094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the role of memory in misinformation corrections: Repeated exposure, correction durability, and source credibility.
    Kemp PL; Goldman AC; Wahlheim CN
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2024 Apr; 56():101783. PubMed ID: 38171060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Corrections of political misinformation: no evidence for an effect of partisan worldview in a US convenience sample.
    Ecker UKH; Sze BKN; Andreotta M
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2021 Apr; 376(1822):20200145. PubMed ID: 33612006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effective correction of misinformation.
    Prike T; Ecker UKH
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2023 Dec; 54():101712. PubMed ID: 37944323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanisms in continued influence: The impact of misinformation corrections on source perceptions.
    Westbrook V; Wegener DT; Susmann MW
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Aug; 51(6):1317-1330. PubMed ID: 36988856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Searching for the Backfire Effect: Measurement and Design Considerations.
    Swire-Thompson B; DeGutis J; Lazer D
    J Appl Res Mem Cogn; 2020 Sep; 9(3):286-299. PubMed ID: 32905023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Challenge of Debunking Health Misinformation in Dynamic Social Media Conversations: Online Randomized Study of Public Masking During COVID-19.
    Mourali M; Drake C
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Mar; 24(3):e34831. PubMed ID: 35156933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Continued influence of misinformation in times of COVID-19.
    van Huijstee D; Vermeulen I; Kerkhof P; Droog E
    Int J Psychol; 2022 Feb; 57(1):136-145. PubMed ID: 34448200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Debunking: A Meta-Analysis of the Psychological Efficacy of Messages Countering Misinformation.
    Chan MS; Jones CR; Hall Jamieson K; Albarracín D
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1531-1546. PubMed ID: 28895452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing.
    Lewandowsky S; Ecker UK; Seifert CM; Schwarz N; Cook J
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2012 Dec; 13(3):106-31. PubMed ID: 26173286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a template for countering misinformation-Real-world Autism treatment myth debunking.
    Paynter J; Luskin-Saxby S; Keen D; Fordyce K; Frost G; Imms C; Miller S; Trembath D; Tucker M; Ecker U
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210746. PubMed ID: 30699155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The global effectiveness of fact-checking: Evidence from simultaneous experiments in Argentina, Nigeria, South Africa, and the United Kingdom.
    Porter E; Wood TJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Sep; 118(37):. PubMed ID: 34507996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correction format has a limited role when debunking misinformation.
    Swire-Thompson B; Cook J; Butler LH; Sanderson JA; Lewandowsky S; Ecker UKH
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Dec; 6(1):83. PubMed ID: 34964924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Memory and belief updating following complete and partial reminders of fake news.
    Kemp PL; Sinclair AH; Adcock RA; Wahlheim CN
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2024 May; 9(1):28. PubMed ID: 38713308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.