These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32844338)

  • 21. Correcting eyewitness suggestibility: does explanatory role predict resistance to correction?
    Braun BE; Zaragoza MS; Chrobak QM; Ithisuphalap J
    Memory; 2021 Jan; 29(1):59-77. PubMed ID: 33290185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How to debunk misinformation? An experimental online study investigating text structures and headline formats.
    Kotz J; Giese H; König LM
    Br J Health Psychol; 2023 Nov; 28(4):1097-1112. PubMed ID: 37263771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Misinformation and Morality: Encountering Fake-News Headlines Makes Them Seem Less Unethical to Publish and Share.
    Effron DA; Raj M
    Psychol Sci; 2020 Jan; 31(1):75-87. PubMed ID: 31751517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The role of familiarity in correcting inaccurate information.
    Swire B; Ecker UKH; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1948-1961. PubMed ID: 28504531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Keeping track of 'alternative facts': The neural correlates of processing misinformation corrections.
    Gordon A; Quadflieg S; Brooks JCW; Ecker UKH; Lewandowsky S
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jun; 193():46-56. PubMed ID: 30872047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Investigation of the determinants for misinformation correction effectiveness on social media during COVID-19 pandemic.
    Zhang Y; Guo B; Ding Y; Liu J; Qiu C; Liu S; Yu Z
    Inf Process Manag; 2022 May; 59(3):102935. PubMed ID: 35400028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Factual corrections: Concerns and current evidence.
    Porter E; Wood TJ
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2024 Feb; 55():101715. PubMed ID: 37988954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Does explaining the origins of misinformation improve the effectiveness of a given correction?
    Connor Desai S; Reimers S
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Feb; 51(2):422-436. PubMed ID: 36125658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. More familiar, more credible? Distinguishing two types of familiarity on the truth effect using the drift-diffusion model.
    Pan W; Hu TY
    J Soc Psychol; 2024 Jun; ():1-19. PubMed ID: 38852171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The continued influence of implied and explicitly stated misinformation in news reports.
    Rich PR; Zaragoza MS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jan; 42(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 26147670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Why Do People Believe in Vaccine Misinformation? The Roles of Perceived Familiarity and Evidence Type.
    Fang Y
    Health Commun; 2024 Mar; ():1-13. PubMed ID: 38514925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Correcting false information in memory: manipulating the strength of misinformation encoding and its retraction.
    Ecker UK; Lewandowsky S; Swire B; Chang D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Jun; 18(3):570-8. PubMed ID: 21359617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Demographics and topics impact on the co-spread of COVID-19 misinformation and fact-checks on Twitter.
    Burel G; Farrell T; Alani H
    Inf Process Manag; 2021 Nov; 58(6):102732. PubMed ID: 34511703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Recalling fake news during real news corrections can impair or enhance memory updating: the role of recollection-based retrieval.
    Kemp PL; Alexander TR; Wahlheim CN
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2022 Sep; 7(1):85. PubMed ID: 36114359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Time pressure reduces misinformation discrimination ability but does not alter response bias.
    Sultan M; Tump AN; Geers M; Lorenz-Spreen P; Herzog SM; Kurvers RHJM
    Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):22416. PubMed ID: 36575232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Misinformation does not reduce trust in accurate search results, but warning banners may backfire.
    Williams-Ceci S; Macy MW; Naaman M
    Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):10977. PubMed ID: 38744967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reminders of Everyday Misinformation Statements Can Enhance Memory for and Beliefs in Corrections of Those Statements in the Short Term.
    Wahlheim CN; Alexander TR; Peske CD
    Psychol Sci; 2020 Oct; 31(10):1325-1339. PubMed ID: 32976064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Vaccination against misinformation: The inoculation technique reduces the continued influence effect.
    Buczel KA; Szyszka PD; Siwiak A; Szpitalak M; Polczyk R
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0267463. PubMed ID: 35482715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Medical misinformation on social media: should it be corrected or not?].
    Pleijter ARJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2022 Dec; 166():. PubMed ID: 36633086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The relationship between DRM and misinformation false memories.
    Zhu B; Chen C; Loftus EF; Lin C; Dong Q
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Aug; 41(6):832-8. PubMed ID: 23397226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.