211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32844454)
1. Clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to lanolin: A ROAT study.
Uldahl A; Engfeldt M; Svedman C
Contact Dermatitis; 2021 Jan; 84(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 32844454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnosing lanolin contact allergy with lanolin alcohol and Amerchol L101.
Knijp J; Bruynzeel DP; Rustemeyer T
Contact Dermatitis; 2019 May; 80(5):298-303. PubMed ID: 30624788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contact sensitization to lanolin alcohols and Amerchol® L101 - analysis of IVDK data.
Uter W; Schnuch A; Geier J;
Contact Dermatitis; 2018 May; 78(5):367-369. PubMed ID: 29611262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Gene profiling reveals a contact allergy signature in most positive Amerchol L-101 patch test reactions.
Ljungberg Silic L; Lefevre MA; Bergendorff O; De Bernard S; Nourikyan J; Buffat L; Nosbaum A; Bruze M; Nicolas JF; Svedman C; Vocanson M
Contact Dermatitis; 2022 Jul; 87(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 35184302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnosis and prevalence of lanolin allergy.
Miest RY; Yiannias JA; Chang YH; Singh N
Dermatitis; 2013; 24(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 23665833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Discrepancy in patch test results with wool wax alcohols and Amerchol L-101.
Matthieu L; Dockx P
Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Mar; 36(3):150-1. PubMed ID: 9145265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patch testing is a useful investigation in children with eczema.
Moustafa M; Holden CR; Athavale P; Cork MJ; Messenger AG; Gawkrodger DJ
Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Oct; 65(4):208-12. PubMed ID: 21504435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by hydroperoxides of limonene and dose-response relationship-A repeated open application test (ROAT) study.
Bennike NH; Palangi L; Christensson JB; Nilsson U; Zachariae C; Johansen JD; Hagvall L
Contact Dermatitis; 2019 Apr; 80(4):208-216. PubMed ID: 30378136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Repeated open application tests with methyldibromoglutaronitrile in dermatitis patients with and without hypersensitivity to methyldibromoglutaronitrile.
Isaksson M; Gruvberger B; Bruze M
Dermatitis; 2007 Dec; 18(4):203-7. PubMed ID: 18021599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Allergic reactivity for different dilutions of eugenol in repeated open application test and patch testing.
Ofenloch RF; Andersen KE; Foti C; Giménez-Arnau AM; Mowitz M; Salvador JFS; Svedman C; Bruze M
Contact Dermatitis; 2023 Aug; 89(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 37218587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical relevance of tixocortol pivalate-positive patch tests and questionable bioequivalence of different hydrocortisone preparations.
Shaw DW; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 2013 Jun; 68(6):369-75. PubMed ID: 23692037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of a questionnaire algorithm based on repeated open application testing with the constituents of fragrance mix I.
Bruze M; Engfeldt M; Ofenloch R; Elsner P; Goncalo M; Isaksson M; Naldi L; Schuttelaar ML; Svensson Å; Diepgen T
Br J Dermatol; 2020 Apr; 182(4):955-964. PubMed ID: 31206595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nickel allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds.
Fischer LA; Johansen JD; Menné T
Br J Dermatol; 2007 Oct; 157(4):723-9. PubMed ID: 17634081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Positive patch test reactions to lanolin: cross-sectional data from the north american contact dermatitis group, 1994 to 2006.
Warshaw EM; Nelsen DD; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Zug KA; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Fowler JF; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA
Dermatitis; 2009; 20(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 19426613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lanolin Allergic Reactions: North American Contact Dermatitis Group Experience, 2001 to 2018.
Silverberg JI; Patel N; Warshaw EM; DeKoven JG; Atwater AR; Belsito DV; Dunnick CA; Houle MC; Reeder MJ; Maibach HI; Zug KA; Taylor JS; Sasseville D; Fransway AF; DeLeo VA; Pratt MD; Fowler JF; Zirwas MJ
Dermatitis; 2022 May-Jun 01; 33(3):193-199. PubMed ID: 35481824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patch testing with the irritant sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) is useful in interpreting weak reactions to contact allergens as allergic or irritant.
Geier J; Uter W; Pirker C; Frosch PJ
Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Feb; 48(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 12694214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Repeated open application test with methyldibromo glutaronitrile, a multicentre study within the EECDRG.
Gruvberger B; Andersen KE; Brandão FM; Bruynzeel DP; Bruze M; Frosch PJ; Goossens A; Lahti A; Maibach HI; Menné T; Orton D; Seidenari S
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jan; 52(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 15701125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds.
Fischer LA; Menné T; Avnstorp C; Kasting GB; Johansen JD
Br J Dermatol; 2009 Sep; 161(3):560-7. PubMed ID: 19486000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lanolin.
Jenkins BA; Belsito DV
Dermatitis; 2023; 34(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 36917502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
