These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32844455)

  • 1. Variability in cesarean delivery rates among individual labor and delivery nurses compared to physicians at three attribution time points.
    Edmonds JK; Weiseth A; Neal BJ; Woodbury SR; Miller K; Souter V; Shah NT
    Health Serv Res; 2021 Apr; 56(2):204-213. PubMed ID: 32844455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variation in Cesarean Birth Rates by Labor and Delivery Nurses.
    Edmonds JK; O'Hara M; Clarke SP; Shah NT
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2017; 46(4):486-493. PubMed ID: 28549612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hospital-Level Variation in the Frequency of Cesarean Delivery Among Nulliparous Women Who Undergo Labor Induction.
    Main EK; Chang SC; Cheng YW; Rosenstein MG; Lagrew DC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Dec; 136(6):1179-1189. PubMed ID: 33156193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nurses' care during labor: its effect on the cesarean birth rate of healthy, nulliparous women.
    Radin TG; Harmon JS; Hanson DA
    Birth; 1993 Mar; 20(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 8503962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Association between provider type and cesarean birth in healthy nulliparous laboring women: A retrospective cohort study.
    Carlson NS; Corwin EJ; Hernandez TL; Holt E; Lowe NK; Hurt KJ
    Birth; 2018 Jun; 45(2):159-168. PubMed ID: 29388247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of severity of illness on cesarean delivery rates in Washington State.
    Hitti J; Walker S; Benedetti TJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):474.e1-474.e5. PubMed ID: 28666693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variation of intrapartum care and cesarean rates among practitioners attending births of low-risk, nulliparous women.
    Iobst SE; Storr CL; Bingham D; Zhu S; Johantgen M
    Birth; 2020 Jun; 47(2):227-236. PubMed ID: 32052482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hospital variation in cesarean delivery rates: contribution of individual and hospital factors in Florida.
    Sebastião YV; Womack L; Vamos CA; Louis JM; Olaoye F; Caragan T; Bubu OM; Detman LA; Curran JS; Sappenfield WM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 214(1):123.e1-123.e18. PubMed ID: 26292046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.
    Souter V; Painter I; Sitcov K; Caughey AB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):273.e1-273.e11. PubMed ID: 30716284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nulliparous term singleton vertex cesarean delivery rates: institutional and individual level predictors.
    Coonrod DV; Drachman D; Hobson P; Manriquez M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 198(6):694.e1-11; discussion 694.e11. PubMed ID: 18538157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variation in primary cesarean delivery rates by individual physician within a single-hospital laborist model.
    Metz TD; Allshouse AA; Gilbert SAB; Doyle R; Tong A; Carey JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):531.e1-531.e6. PubMed ID: 26922481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cesarean section rates in low-risk private patients managed by certified nurse-midwives and obstetricians.
    Davis LG; Riedmann GL; Sapiro M; Minogue JP; Kazer RR
    J Nurse Midwifery; 1994; 39(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 8027851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lowering the cesarean section rate in a private hospital: comparison of individual physicians' rates, risk factors, and outcomes.
    Lagrew DC; Adashek JA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun; 178(6):1207-14. PubMed ID: 9662303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relationship between cesarean section and labor induction.
    Wilson BL; Effken J; Butler RJ
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2010 Jun; 42(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 20618597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identifying optimal labor and delivery nurse staffing: The case of cesarean births and nursing hours.
    Wilson BL; Butler RJ
    Nurs Outlook; 2021; 69(1):84-95. PubMed ID: 32859425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Continuity of nursing care and its link to cesarean birth rate.
    Gagnon AJ; Meier KM; Waghorn K
    Birth; 2007 Mar; 34(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 17324175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hospital variation in utilization and success of trial of labor after a prior cesarean.
    Xu X; Lee HC; Lin H; Lundsberg LS; Campbell KH; Lipkind HS; Pettker CM; Illuzzi JL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 220(1):98.e1-98.e14. PubMed ID: 30278176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing Methods of Identifying Outlying Nurses in Audits of Low-Risk Cesarean Delivery Rates.
    Edmonds JK; Woodbury SR; Lipsitz SR; Weiseth A; Farrell ME; Shah NT; Greene N; Gregory KD
    J Nurs Care Qual; 2022 Apr-Jun 01; 37(2):149-154. PubMed ID: 34446663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association between vaginal birth after cesarean delivery and primary cesarean delivery rates.
    Rosenstein MG; Kuppermann M; Gregorich SE; Cottrell EK; Caughey AB; Cheng YW
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Nov; 122(5):1010-1017. PubMed ID: 24104780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Association of Primary Cesarean Delivery Rate With Dissemination of Nurse-Specific Cesarean Delivery Rates.
    Greene NH; Schwartz N; Gregory KD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Oct; 140(4):610-612. PubMed ID: 36075075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.