618 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32845067)
1. Non-invasive procedural planning using computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve.
Bom MJ; Schumacher SP; Driessen RS; van Diemen PA; Everaars H; de Winter RW; van de Ven PM; van Rossum AC; Sprengers RW; Verouden NJW; Nap A; Opolski MP; Leipsic JA; Danad I; Taylor CA; Knaapen P
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Mar; 97(4):614-622. PubMed ID: 32845067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical Validation of a Virtual Planner for Coronary Interventions Based on Coronary CT Angiography.
Sonck J; Nagumo S; Norgaard BL; Otake H; Ko B; Zhang J; Mizukami T; Maeng M; Andreini D; Takahashi Y; Jensen JM; Ihdayhid A; Heggermont W; Barbato E; Mileva N; Munhoz D; Bartunek J; Updegrove A; Collinsworth A; Penicka M; Van Hoe L; Leipsic J; Koo BK; De Bruyne B; Collet C
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Jul; 15(7):1242-1255. PubMed ID: 35798401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rationale and design of the precise percutaneous coronary intervention plan (P3) study: Prospective evaluation of a virtual computed tomography-based percutaneous intervention planner.
Nagumo S; Collet C; Norgaard BL; Otake H; Ko B; Koo BK; Leipsic J; Andreini D; Heggermont W; Jensen JM; Takahashi Y; Ihdayhid A; Zhang Z; Barbato E; Maeng M; Mizukami T; Bartunek J; Updegrove A; Penicka M; Rogers C; Taylor C; De Bruyne B; Sonck J
Clin Cardiol; 2021 Apr; 44(4):446-454. PubMed ID: 33656754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of coronary CT image quality on the accuracy of the FFR
Andreini D; Belmonte M; Penicka M; Van Hoe L; Mileva N; Paolisso P; Nagumo S; Nørgaard BL; Ko B; Otake H; Koo BK; Jensen JM; Mizukami T; Munhoz D; Updegrove A; Taylor C; Leipsic J; Sonck J; De Bruyne B; Collet C
Eur Radiol; 2024 Apr; 34(4):2677-2688. PubMed ID: 37798406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predicting the Physiological Effect of Revascularization in Serially Diseased Coronary Arteries.
Modi BN; Sankaran S; Kim HJ; Ellis H; Rogers C; Taylor CA; Rajani R; Perera D
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Feb; 12(2):e007577. PubMed ID: 30722688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel noninvasive technology for treatment planning using virtual coronary stenting and computed tomography-derived computed fractional flow reserve.
Kim KH; Doh JH; Koo BK; Min JK; Erglis A; Yang HM; Park KW; Lee HY; Kang HJ; Kim YJ; Lee SY; Kim HS
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 7(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 24332418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of lesion-specific ischemia using fractional flow reserve (FFR) profiles derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (FFRCT) and invasive pressure measurements (FFRINV): Importance of the site of measurement and implications for patient referral for invasive coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention.
Cami E; Tagami T; Raff G; Fonte TA; Renard B; Gallagher MJ; Chinnaiyan K; Bilolikar A; Fan A; Hafeez A; Safian RD
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(6):480-492. PubMed ID: 30274795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detecting lesion-specific ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease with computed tomography fractional flow reserve measured at different sites.
Cai Z; Yu T; Yang Z; Hu H; Lin Y; Zhang H; Chen M; Shi G; Shen J
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Jun; 23(1):76. PubMed ID: 37277697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of Fractional Flow Reserve Derived From Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography on Heart Team Treatment Decision-Making in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the SYNTAX III REVOLUTION Trial.
Andreini D; Modolo R; Katagiri Y; Mushtaq S; Sonck J; Collet C; De Martini S; Roberto M; Tanaka K; Miyazaki Y; Czapla J; Schoors D; Plass A; Maisano F; Kaufmann P; Orry X; Metzdorf PA; Folliguet T; Färber G; Diamantis I; Schönweiß M; Bonalumi G; Guglielmo M; Ferrari C; Olivares P; Cavallotti L; Leal I; Lindeboom W; Onuma Y; Serruys PW; Bartorelli AL;
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Dec; 12(12):e007607. PubMed ID: 31833413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. QFR Versus FFR Derived From Computed Tomography for Functional Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis.
Tanigaki T; Emori H; Kawase Y; Kubo T; Omori H; Shiono Y; Sobue Y; Shimamura K; Hirata T; Matsuo Y; Ota H; Kitabata H; Okubo M; Ino Y; Matsuo H; Akasaka T
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Oct; 12(20):2050-2059. PubMed ID: 31648766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Coronary CT-based FFR in patients with acute myocardial infarction might predict follow-up invasive FFR: The XPECT-MI study.
Boussoussou M; Édes IF; Nowotta F; Vattay B; Vecsey-Nagy M; Drobni Z; Simon J; Kolossváry M; Németh B; Jermendy ÁL; Becker D; Leipsic J; Rogers C; Collinsworth A; Maurovich-Horvat P; Merkely B; Szilveszter B
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2023; 17(4):269-276. PubMed ID: 37244776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison Between Non-invasive (Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Derived) and Invasive-Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients with Serial Stenoses Within One Coronary Artery: A NXT Trial substudy.
Tanaka K; Bezerra HG; Gaur S; Attizzani GF; Bøtker HE; Costa MA; Rogers C; Nørgaard BL
Ann Biomed Eng; 2016 Feb; 44(2):580-9. PubMed ID: 26329923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimized interpretation of fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography: Comparison of three interpretation methods.
Takagi H; Ishikawa Y; Orii M; Ota H; Niiyama M; Tanaka R; Morino Y; Yoshioka K
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2019; 13(2):134-141. PubMed ID: 30385326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Projected costs and consequences of computed tomography-determined fractional flow reserve.
Hlatky MA; Saxena A; Koo BK; Erglis A; Zarins CK; Min JK
Clin Cardiol; 2013 Dec; 36(12):743-8. PubMed ID: 24114863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography in Nonculprit Lesions of Patients With Recent STEMI.
Gaur S; Taylor CA; Jensen JM; Bøtker HE; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft AK; Holm NR; Leipsic J; Zarins CK; Achenbach S; Khem S; Wilk A; Bezerra HG; Lassen JF; Nørgaard BL
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Apr; 10(4):424-433. PubMed ID: 27743953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography: variation of repeated analyses.
Gaur S; Bezerra HG; Lassen JF; Christiansen EH; Tanaka K; Jensen JM; Oldroyd KG; Leipsic J; Achenbach S; Kaltoft AK; Bøtker HE; Nørgaard BL
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 25151923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-invasive CT-derived fractional flow reserve and static rest and stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically significant coronary stenosis.
Ko BS; Linde JJ; Ihdayhid AR; Norgaard BL; Kofoed KF; Sørgaard M; Adams D; Crossett M; Cameron JD; Seneviratne SK
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Nov; 35(11):2103-2112. PubMed ID: 31273632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of reconstruction kernels on the accuracy of CT-derived fractional flow reserve.
Ammon F; Moshage M; Smolka S; Goeller M; Bittner DO; Achenbach S; Marwan M
Eur Radiol; 2022 Apr; 32(4):2604-2610. PubMed ID: 34735608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Planning percutaneous coronary interventions using computed tomography angiography and fractional flow reserve-derived from computed tomography: A state-of-the-art review.
Feldmann K; Cami E; Safian RD
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Feb; 93(2):298-304. PubMed ID: 30286519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term prognostic implications of CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: Results from the DISCOVER-FLOW study.
Yang S; Chung J; Lesina K; Doh JH; Jegere S; Erglis A; Leipsic JA; Fearon WF; Narula J; Koo BK
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2024; 18(3):251-258. PubMed ID: 38378313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
