173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32845471)
1. Does dose optimisation in digital panoramic radiography affect diagnostic performance?
Martins LAC; Brasil DM; Forner LA; Viccari C; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ; Oliveira ML
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Feb; 25(2):637-643. PubMed ID: 32845471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography.
Gavala S; Donta C; Tsiklakis K; Boziari A; Kamenopoulou V; Stamatakis HC
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18448296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetry analysis of panoramic-imaging devices in different-sized phantoms.
Wahid MA; Choi E; MacDonald DS; Ford NL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 28300383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Dose measurements comparing conventional and digital panoramic radiography].
Visser H; Hermann KP; Bredemeier S; Köhler B
Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2000 Jul; 4(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 10994319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: technique improvement and low-dose protocols.
Feragalli B; Rampado O; Abate C; Macrì M; Festa F; Stromei F; Caputi S; Guglielmi G
Radiol Med; 2017 Aug; 122(8):581-588. PubMed ID: 28365888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: Patient exposure.
Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Debaveye D; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 15897284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Absorbed organ and effective doses from digital intra-oral and panoramic radiography applying the ICRP 103 recommendations for effective dose estimations.
Granlund C; Thilander-Klang A; Ylhan B; Lofthag-Hansen S; Ekestubbe A
Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20151052. PubMed ID: 27452261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part II: Occupational exposure.
Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Debaveye D; Bogaerts R; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 15897285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative study of the effective radiation doses from cone beam computed tomography and plain radiography for sialography.
Jadu F; Yaffe MJ; Lam EW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Jul; 39(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 20587648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of lead apron shielding on absorbed doses from panoramic radiography.
Rottke D; Grossekettler L; Sawada K; Poxleitner P; Schulze D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130302. PubMed ID: 24174012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of dose reduction on the detectability of standardized radiolucent lesions in digital panoramic radiography.
Dula K; Sanderink G; van der Stelt PF; Mini R; Buser D
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Aug; 86(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 9720100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Organ doses and subjective image quality of indirect digital panoramic radiography.
Gijbels F; Sanderink G; Bou Serhal C; Pauwels H; Jacobs R
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Nov; 30(6):308-13. PubMed ID: 11641728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Low-dosage dental CT].
Rustemeyer P; Streubühr U; Hohn HP; Rustemeyer R; Eich HT; John-Mikolajewski V; Müller RD
Rofo; 1999 Aug; 171(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 10506887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Dose exposure from analog and digital full mouth radiography and panoramic radiography].
Kiefer H; Lambrecht JT; Roth J
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2004; 114(7):687-93. PubMed ID: 15360104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effective dose reduction using collimation function in digital panoramic radiography and possible clinical implications in dentistry.
Benchimol D; Koivisto J; Kadesjö N; Shi XQ
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Oct; 47(7):20180007. PubMed ID: 29722543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of lead apron shielding on absorbed doses from panoramic radiography.
Rottke D; Grossekettler L; Sawada K; Poxleitner P; Schulze D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130302. PubMed ID: 24404601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Absorbed doses modified by exposure settings with rotational panoramic radiography.
Hayakawa Y; Kobayashi N; Kousuge Y; Fujimori H; Kuroyanagi K
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1994 Aug; 35(3):121-5. PubMed ID: 8620589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging.
Grünheid T; Kolbeck Schieck JR; Pliska BT; Ahmad M; Larson BE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiation dose in dental radiology.
Cohnen M; Kemper J; Möbes O; Pawelzik J; Mödder U
Eur Radiol; 2002 Mar; 12(3):634-7. PubMed ID: 11870479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Shielding effect of thyroid collar for digital panoramic radiography.
Han GS; Cheng JG; Li G; Ma XC
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(9):20130265. PubMed ID: 24005060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
