These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
46. Effective dosages for recording Veraviewepocs dental panoramic images: analog film, digital, and panoramic scout for CBCT. Garcia Silva MA; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Gründler K; Visser H; Hirsch E Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):571-7. PubMed ID: 18602314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. CT of the sacroiliac joints. Dosimetry and optimal settings for a high-resolution technique. Damilakis J; Prassopoulos P; Perisinakis K; Faflia C; Gourtsoyiannis N Acta Radiol; 1997 Sep; 38(5):870-5. PubMed ID: 9332247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Evaluation of the different exposure parameters for the accurate diagnosis of peri-implantitis severity in digital panoramic radiography. Sadik E; Gökmenoğlu C; Altun G; Kara C Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2023 Jan; 28(1):e16-e24. PubMed ID: 36565217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Evaluation of the radiation dose in the thyroid gland using different protective collars in panoramic imaging. Hafezi L; Arianezhad SM; Hosseini Pooya SM Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Jul; 47(6):20170428. PubMed ID: 29658781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Comparison of dosimetry methods for panoramic radiography: thermoluminescent dosimeter measurement versus personal computer-based Monte Carlo method calculation. Lee C; Lee SS; Kim JE; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Choi SC Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 Mar; 121(3):322-9. PubMed ID: 26795453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Effective dose from direct and indirect digital panoramic units. Lee GS; Kim JS; Seo YS; Kim JD Imaging Sci Dent; 2013 Jun; 43(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 23807930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Exposure and dose in panoramic radiology. Goldstein A Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):1033-40. PubMed ID: 9650194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Charge-coupled device panoramic radiography: effect of beam energy on radiation exposure. Farman TT; Farman AG; Kelly MS; Firriolo FJ; Yancey JM; Stewart AV Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jan; 27(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 9482021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The effect of dose reduction on the detection of anatomical structures on panoramic radiographs. Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 16798925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Effects of scanning parameters reduction in dental radiographs on image quality and diagnostic performance: A randomised controlled trial. Ghazali L; Mohd Yusof MYP; Norman NH J Orthod; 2021 Mar; 48(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 33200660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Clinical evaluation of dose reduction on image quality of panoramic radiographs. Alkurt MT; Peker I; Usalan G; Altunkaynak B J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Jul; 9(5):34-41. PubMed ID: 18633467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Effective and organ doses from scanography and zonography: a comparison with periapical radiography. Ekestubbe A; Thilander-Klang A; Lith A; Gröndahl HG Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 15313999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Effective dose from radiation absorbed during a panoramic examination with a new generation machine. Danforth RA; Clark DE Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Feb; 89(2):236-43. PubMed ID: 10673663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Reduction of absorbed doses to the thyroid gland in orthodontic treatment planning by reducing the area of irradiation. Svenson B; Sjöholm B; Jonsson B Swed Dent J; 2004; 28(3):137-47. PubMed ID: 15506691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]