These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32845471)

  • 41. Radiation dose of cone-beam computed tomography compared to conventional radiographs in orthodontics.
    Signorelli L; Patcas R; Peltomäki T; Schätzle M
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jan; 77(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 26747662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Radiation doses of commonly used dental radiographic surveys.
    Freeman JP; Brand JW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Mar; 77(3):285-9. PubMed ID: 8170662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Absorbed dose reduced by sliced exposure using sector selector system with rotational panoramic radiography.
    Hayakawa Y; Kobayashi N; Kousuge Y; Fujimori H; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1994 Aug; 35(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 8620590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT.
    Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL; Howerton WB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):219-26. PubMed ID: 16798915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Panoramic radiography in dental diagnostics.
    Molander B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 119():1-26. PubMed ID: 8971997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effective dosages for recording Veraviewepocs dental panoramic images: analog film, digital, and panoramic scout for CBCT.
    Garcia Silva MA; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Gründler K; Visser H; Hirsch E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):571-7. PubMed ID: 18602314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. CT of the sacroiliac joints. Dosimetry and optimal settings for a high-resolution technique.
    Damilakis J; Prassopoulos P; Perisinakis K; Faflia C; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Acta Radiol; 1997 Sep; 38(5):870-5. PubMed ID: 9332247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of the different exposure parameters for the accurate diagnosis of peri-implantitis severity in digital panoramic radiography.
    Sadik E; Gökmenoğlu C; Altun G; Kara C
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2023 Jan; 28(1):e16-e24. PubMed ID: 36565217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Evaluation of the radiation dose in the thyroid gland using different protective collars in panoramic imaging.
    Hafezi L; Arianezhad SM; Hosseini Pooya SM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Jul; 47(6):20170428. PubMed ID: 29658781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of dosimetry methods for panoramic radiography: thermoluminescent dosimeter measurement versus personal computer-based Monte Carlo method calculation.
    Lee C; Lee SS; Kim JE; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Choi SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 Mar; 121(3):322-9. PubMed ID: 26795453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effective dose from direct and indirect digital panoramic units.
    Lee GS; Kim JS; Seo YS; Kim JD
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2013 Jun; 43(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 23807930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Exposure and dose in panoramic radiology.
    Goldstein A
    Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):1033-40. PubMed ID: 9650194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Charge-coupled device panoramic radiography: effect of beam energy on radiation exposure.
    Farman TT; Farman AG; Kelly MS; Firriolo FJ; Yancey JM; Stewart AV
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jan; 27(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 9482021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. OSL dosimeters for dental panoramic radiography.
    Gutiérrez-Marquez JG; Avalos-Piña LY; López-Valencia A; Palacios-Pérez LL; Vega-Carrillo HR; Rivera-Montalvo T
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2018 Dec; 142():32-37. PubMed ID: 30248586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The effect of dose reduction on the detection of anatomical structures on panoramic radiographs.
    Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 16798925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects of scanning parameters reduction in dental radiographs on image quality and diagnostic performance: A randomised controlled trial.
    Ghazali L; Mohd Yusof MYP; Norman NH
    J Orthod; 2021 Mar; 48(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 33200660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Clinical evaluation of dose reduction on image quality of panoramic radiographs.
    Alkurt MT; Peker I; Usalan G; Altunkaynak B
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Jul; 9(5):34-41. PubMed ID: 18633467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effective and organ doses from scanography and zonography: a comparison with periapical radiography.
    Ekestubbe A; Thilander-Klang A; Lith A; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 15313999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effective dose from radiation absorbed during a panoramic examination with a new generation machine.
    Danforth RA; Clark DE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Feb; 89(2):236-43. PubMed ID: 10673663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Reduction of absorbed doses to the thyroid gland in orthodontic treatment planning by reducing the area of irradiation.
    Svenson B; Sjöholm B; Jonsson B
    Swed Dent J; 2004; 28(3):137-47. PubMed ID: 15506691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.