These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32846005)

  • 1. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography is limited at implant sites with a thin buccal bone: A laboratory study.
    Domic D; Bertl K; Ahmad S; Schropp L; Hellén-Halme K; Stavropoulos A
    J Periodontol; 2021 Apr; 92(4):592-601. PubMed ID: 32846005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of detecting and measuring buccal bone thickness adjacent to titanium dental implants-a cone beam computed tomography in vitro study.
    Liedke GS; Spin-Neto R; da Silveira HED; Schropp L; Stavropoulos A; Wenzel A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2018 Nov; 126(5):432-438. PubMed ID: 30126809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors affecting the possibility to detect buccal bone condition around dental implants using cone beam computed tomography.
    Liedke GS; Spin-Neto R; da Silveira HED; Schropp L; Stavropoulos A; Wenzel A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1082-1088. PubMed ID: 27444713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of post-implant buccal bone resorption using cone beam computed tomography: a clinical pilot study.
    Vera C; De Kok IJ; Chen W; Reside G; Tyndall D; Cooper LF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):1249-57. PubMed ID: 23057042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fate of the buccal bone at implants placed early, delayed, or late after tooth extraction analyzed by cone beam CT: 10-year results from a randomized, controlled, clinical study.
    Schropp L; Wenzel A; Spin-Neto R; Stavropoulos A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 May; 26(5):492-500. PubMed ID: 24890861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The accuracy of probing, ultrasound and cone-beam CT scans for determining the buccal bone plate dimensions around oral implants - A systematic review.
    Dhondt R; Quirynen M; Tarce M; Teughels W; Temmerman A; Jacobs R
    J Periodontal Res; 2022 Aug; 57(4):754-767. PubMed ID: 35612409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of peri-implant bone evaluation using cone beam CT, digital intra-oral radiographs and histology.
    Ritter L; Elger MC; Rothamel D; Fienitz T; Zinser M; Schwarz F; Zöller JE
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(6):20130088. PubMed ID: 24786136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of peri-implant defects at titanium and zirconium dioxide implants by means of periapical radiographs and cone beam computed tomography: An in-vitro examination.
    Steiger-Ronay V; Krcmaric Z; Schmidlin PR; Sahrmann P; Wiedemeier DB; Benic GI
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 30387207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cone beam computed tomography artefacts around dental implants with different materials influencing the detection of peri-implant bone defects.
    Schriber M; Yeung AWK; Suter VGA; Buser D; Leung YY; Bornstein MM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Jul; 31(7):595-606. PubMed ID: 32147872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cone beam computed tomographic evaluation of implants with platform-switched Morse taper connection with the implant-abutment interface at different levels in relation to the alveolar crest.
    Koutouzis T; Neiva R; Nair M; Nonhoff J; Lundgren T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1157-63. PubMed ID: 25216143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of CBCT filters and contrast adjustments on peri-implant buccal bone thickness measurement and blooming expression.
    Mello HN; Bonadiman EA; Bruneli GL; Pitol GA; de-Azevedo-Vaz SL
    Clin Oral Investig; 2024 May; 28(6):315. PubMed ID: 38748313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the accuracy of buccal bone thickness measurement from cone beam computed tomography compared with histologic analysis.
    Tanaka Y; Dutra V; Lin WS; Levon J; Hamada Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; 130(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 34756426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Buccal bone thickness at dental implants in the aesthetic zone: A 1-year follow-up cone beam computed tomography study.
    Slagter KW; Raghoebar GM; Bakker NA; Vissink A; Meijer HJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 45(1):13-19. PubMed ID: 27939041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of peri-implant buccal bone by computed tomography: an experimental study.
    González-Martín O; Oteo C; Ortega R; Alandez J; Sanz M; Veltri M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Aug; 27(8):950-5. PubMed ID: 26178780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Zirconia implants interfere with the evaluation of peri-implant bone defects in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images even with artifact reduction, a pilot study.
    Kuusisto N; Abushahba F; Syrjänen S; Huumonen S; Vallittu P; Närhi T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Nov; 52(8):20230252. PubMed ID: 37641961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inaccuracy of buccal bone thickness estimation on cone-beam CT due to implant blooming: An ex-vivo study.
    Vanderstuyft T; Tarce M; Sanaan B; Jacobs R; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Quirynen M
    J Clin Periodontol; 2019 Nov; 46(11):1134-1143. PubMed ID: 31446644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, dental magnetic resonance imaging, and intraoral radiography for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single zirconia implants-An in vitro study.
    Hilgenfeld T; Juerchott A; Deisenhofer UK; Krisam J; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Sep; 29(9):922-930. PubMed ID: 30112833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Higher Resolution in Cone Beam Computed Tomography Is Accompanied by Improved Bone Detection in Peri-implant Bone Despite Metal Artifact Presence.
    Kerkfeld V; Meyer U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1331-1338. PubMed ID: 30427964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of buccal alveolar bone dimension of maxillary anterior and premolar teeth: a cone beam computed tomography investigation.
    Vera C; De Kok IJ; Reinhold D; Limpiphipatanakorn P; Yap AK; Tyndall D; Cooper LF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1514-9. PubMed ID: 23189304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measurement of buccal bone volume of dental implants by means of cone-beam computed tomography.
    Shiratori LN; Marotti J; Yamanouchi J; Chilvarquer I; Contin I; Tortamano-Neto P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jul; 23(7):797-804. PubMed ID: 21631591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.