650 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32847323)
1. [Application and efficacy of the adjustment on left ventricular electrical delay and the distance between right and left ventricular pacing polar in optimizing the left ventricular pacing polar].
Yan XL; Liang YC; Yu HB; Xu BG; Gao Y; Liu R; Xu GQ; Wu M
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 48(8):669-674. PubMed ID: 32847323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Acute echocardiographic optimization of multiple stimulation configurations of cardiac resynchronization therapy through quadripolar left ventricular pacing: a tailored approach.
Calò L; Martino A; de Ruvo E; Minati M; Fratini S; Rebecchi M; Lanzillo C; Fagagnini A; Borrelli A; De Luca L; Sciarra L
Am Heart J; 2014 Apr; 167(4):546-54. PubMed ID: 24655704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non-Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single-Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization.
Leyva F; Zegard A; Qiu T; Acquaye E; Ferrante G; Walton J; Marshall H
J Am Heart Assoc; 2017 Oct; 6(10):. PubMed ID: 29042422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness and Reliability of Selected Site Pacing for Avoidance of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in CRT Patients with Quadripolar LV Leads: The EffaceQ Study.
Oswald H; Asbach S; Köbe J; Weglage H; Schulte-Pitzke B; Brachmann J
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2015 Aug; 38(8):942-50. PubMed ID: 25974406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of Left Ventricular vs Biventricular Pacing on Reverse Remodelling: Insights From the Evaluation of Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure (EARTH) Trial.
Skaf S; Thibault B; Khairy P; O'Meara E; Fortier A; Vakulenko HV; Pitre C; White M; Ducharme A;
Can J Cardiol; 2017 Oct; 33(10):1274-1282. PubMed ID: 28941607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and narrow QRS complexes (≤ 130 ms): role of speckle tracking echocardiography and different interventricular (VV) pacing intervals.
Kantharia BK; Singh A; Narasimhan B; Wu L; Karnik R; Chutani S; Shah AN
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2022 Mar; 63(2):369-377. PubMed ID: 34138397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. His-Optimized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy to Maximize Electrical Resynchronization: A Feasibility Study.
Vijayaraman P; Herweg B; Ellenbogen KA; Gajek J
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2019 Feb; 12(2):e006934. PubMed ID: 30681348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Left ventricular-only fusion pacing versus cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients: A randomized controlled trial.
Su Y; Hua W; Shen F; Zou J; Tang B; Chen K; Liang Y; He L; Zhou X; Zhang X; Lu H; Zhang S
Clin Cardiol; 2021 Sep; 44(9):1225-1232. PubMed ID: 34342026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrically guided versus imaging-guided implant of the left ventricular lead in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a study protocol for a double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial (ElectroCRT).
Stephansen C; Sommer A; Kronborg MB; Jensen JM; Bouchelouche K; Nielsen JC
Trials; 2018 Nov; 19(1):600. PubMed ID: 30382923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Repetitive optimizing left ventricular pacing configurations with quadripolar leads improves response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: A single-center randomized clinical trial.
Gu M; Jin H; Hua W; Fan XH; Ding LG; Wang J; Niu HX; Cai C; Zhang S
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Sep; 96(37):e8066. PubMed ID: 28906405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ventricular activation patterns during intrinsic conduction and right ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients.
O'Donnell D; Manyam H; Pappone C; Park SJ; Leclercq C; Lunati M; Lercher P; Rordorf R; Landolina M; Badie N; McSpadden LC; Ryu K; Mangual JO; Singh JP; Varma N; Niazi IK
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2021 Oct; 44(10):1663-1670. PubMed ID: 34319603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reverse left ventricular remodeling is more likely in non ischemic cardiomyopathy patients upgraded to biventricular stimulation after chronic right ventricular pacing.
Morales MA; Startari U; Rossi G; Panchetti L; Rossi A; Piacenti M
Cardiovasc Ultrasound; 2011 Dec; 9():41. PubMed ID: 22177469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Delivered Via a Multipolar Left Ventricular Lead is Associated with Reduced Mortality and Elimination of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation: Long-Term Follow-Up from a Multicenter Registry.
Behar JM; Bostock J; Zhu Li AP; Chin HM; Jubb S; Lent E; Gamble J; Foley PW; Betts TR; Rinaldi CA; Herring N
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 May; 26(5):540-6. PubMed ID: 25631303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multipoint pacing by a left ventricular quadripolar lead improves the acute hemodynamic response to CRT compared with conventional biventricular pacing at any site.
Zanon F; Baracca E; Pastore G; Marcantoni L; Fraccaro C; Lanza D; Picariello C; Aggio S; Roncon L; Dell'Avvocata F; Rigatelli G; Pacetta D; Noventa F; Prinzen FW
Heart Rhythm; 2015 May; 12(5):975-81. PubMed ID: 25625721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Efficacy of biventricular pacing on preventing heart failure in patients with high degree atrioventricular block (BIVPACE-AVB Trial)].
Zhang XY; Shan QJ; Su YG; Yan J; Bao ZH; Gu X; Qiu JP; Qin SM; Xu J; Su H; Zhu H; Guo JF; Lu JP; Zou JG; Chen ML; Xu D; Cao KJ
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2016 Apr; 44(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 27112612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimization of left ventricular pacing site plus multipoint pacing improves remodeling and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy at 1 year.
Zanon F; Marcantoni L; Baracca E; Pastore G; Lanza D; Fraccaro C; Picariello C; Conte L; Aggio S; Roncon L; Pacetta D; Badie N; Noventa F; Prinzen FW
Heart Rhythm; 2016 Aug; 13(8):1644-51. PubMed ID: 27450156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tailored echocardiographic interventricular delay programming further optimizes left ventricular performance after cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Vanderheyden M; De Backer T; Rivero-Ayerza M; Geelen P; Bartunek J; Verstreken S; De Zutter M; Goethals M
Heart Rhythm; 2005 Oct; 2(10):1066-72. PubMed ID: 16188583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcome of Patients Treated by Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using a Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead.
Bencardino G; Di Monaco A; Russo E; Colizzi C; Perna F; Pelargonio G; Narducci ML; Gabrielli FA; Lanza GA; Rebuzzi AG; Crea F
Circ J; 2016; 80(3):613-8. PubMed ID: 26821688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Right ventricular septal pacing as alternative for failed left ventricular lead implantation in cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates.
Alhous MH; Small GR; Hannah A; Hillis GS; Frenneaux M; Broadhurst PA
Europace; 2015 Jan; 17(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 25359384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term follow-up of patients with a quadripolar active fixation left ventricular lead: An Italian multicenter experience.
De Regibus V; Biffi M; Infusino T; Savastano S; Landolina M; Palmisano P; Foti R; Facchin D; Dello Russo A; Urraro F; Ziacchi M
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1567-1575. PubMed ID: 35634866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
