388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32847441)
1. Outcomes of labor induction at 39 weeks in pregnancies with a prior cesarean delivery.
Park BY; Cryer A; Betoni J; McLean L; Figueroa H; Contag SA; Yao R
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Aug; 35(15):2853-2858. PubMed ID: 32847441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of labor induction at 39 weeks gestation compared with expectant management on maternal and perinatal morbidity among a cohort of low-risk women.
Burn SC; Yao R; Diaz M; Rossi J; Contag S
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):9208-9214. PubMed ID: 34965815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.
Souter V; Painter I; Sitcov K; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):273.e1-273.e11. PubMed ID: 30716284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Induction of labor versus expectant management among low-risk patients with one prior cesarean delivery.
Ukoha EP; Wen T; Reddy UM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38852849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of induction of labor prior to post-term in low-risk pregnancies: a systematic review.
Rydahl E; Eriksen L; Juhl M
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2019 Feb; 17(2):170-208. PubMed ID: 30299344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.
Caughey AB; Sundaram V; Kaimal AJ; Cheng YW; Gienger A; Little SE; Lee JF; Wong L; Shaffer BL; Tran SH; Padula A; McDonald KM; Long EF; Owens DK; Bravata DM
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep); 2009 Mar; (176):1-257. PubMed ID: 19408970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes of Term Induction in Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery: Analysis of a Modern Obstetric Cohort.
Lappen JR; Hackney DN; Bailit JL
Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 126(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 26241264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does induction of labor at 41 weeks (early, mid or late) improve birth outcomes in low-risk pregnancy? A nationwide propensity score-matched study.
Ravelli ACJ; van der Post JAM; de Groot CJM; Abu-Hanna A; Eskes M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 May; 102(5):612-625. PubMed ID: 36915238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Elective Induction of Labor or Expectant Management: Outcomes Among Nulliparous Women with Uncomplicated Pregnancies.
Lewis S; Zhao Z; Schorn M
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2022 Mar; 67(2):170-177. PubMed ID: 35107213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes in individuals with a prior cesarean birth who undergo induction at 39 weeks.
Uwanaka O; Raker C; Gupta M; Bicocca MJ; Fishel Bartal M; Chauhan SP; Wagner S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Jan; 268():12-17. PubMed ID: 34788720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Induction of labour at 39 weeks and adverse outcomes in low-risk pregnancies according to ethnicity, socioeconomic deprivation, and parity: A national cohort study in England.
Muller P; Karia AM; Webster K; Carroll F; Dunn G; Frémeaux A; Harris T; Knight H; Oddie S; Khalil A; Van Der Meulen J; Gurol-Urganci I
PLoS Med; 2023 Jul; 20(7):e1004259. PubMed ID: 37471395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted vaginal compared with planned cesarean delivery in triplet gestations.
Lappen JR; Hackney DN; Bailit JL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):493.e1-6. PubMed ID: 27166014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Maternal Labor-Related Complications and Neonatal Outcomes Following Elective Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks of Gestation vs Expectant Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Hong J; Atkinson J; Roddy Mitchell A; Tong S; Walker SP; Middleton A; Lindquist A; Hastie R
JAMA Netw Open; 2023 May; 6(5):e2313162. PubMed ID: 37171818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Likelihood of primary cesarean section following induction of labor in singleton cephalic pregnancies at term, compared with expectant management: An Australian population-based, historical cohort study.
Hu Y; Homer CSE; Ellwood D; Slavin V; Vogel JP; Enticott J; Callander EJ
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2024 May; 103(5):946-954. PubMed ID: 38291953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Darney BG; Snowden JM; Cheng YW; Jacob L; Nicholson JM; Kaimal A; Dublin S; Getahun D; Caughey AB
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Oct; 122(4):761-769. PubMed ID: 24084532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Severe preeclampsia remote from term: labor induction or elective cesarean delivery?
Nassar AH; Adra AM; Chakhtoura N; Gómez-Marín O; Beydoun S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Nov; 179(5):1210-3. PubMed ID: 9822502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does induction of labor at term increase the risk of cesarean section in advanced maternal age? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fonseca MJ; Santos F; Afreixo V; Silva IS; Almeida MDC
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Oct; 253():213-219. PubMed ID: 32889327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Planned mode of delivery after previous cesarean section and short-term maternal and perinatal outcomes: A population-based record linkage cohort study in Scotland.
Fitzpatrick KE; Kurinczuk JJ; Bhattacharya S; Quigley MA
PLoS Med; 2019 Sep; 16(9):e1002913. PubMed ID: 31550245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Early preterm preeclampsia outcomes by intended mode of delivery.
Coviello EM; Iqbal SN; Grantz KL; Huang CC; Landy HJ; Reddy UM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 220(1):100.e1-100.e9. PubMed ID: 30273585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intended delivery mode and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies with fetal growth restriction.
Rodriguez-Sibaja MJ; Mendez-Piña MA; Lumbreras-Marquez MI; Acevedo-Gallegos S; Velazquez-Torres B; Ramirez-Calvo JA
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2023 Dec; 36(2):2286433. PubMed ID: 38010351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
