These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3284899)
1. Comparison of three techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens from asymptomatic women. Lefebvre J; Laperrière H; Rousseau H; Massé R J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Apr; 26(4):726-31. PubMed ID: 3284899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay and Gen-Probe PACE 2 with cell culture for diagnosis of cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a high-prevalence female population. Clarke LM; Sierra MF; Daidone BJ; Lopez N; Covino JM; McCormack WM J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Apr; 31(4):968-71. PubMed ID: 7681852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of patient characteristics on performance of an enzyme immunoassay for detecting cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Magder LS; Klontz KC; Bush LH; Barnes RC J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Apr; 28(4):781-4. PubMed ID: 2185264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of PCR and direct immunofluorescence microscopy for confirmation of results obtained by Syva MicroTrak Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay. Ostergaard L; Møller JK J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Oct; 33(10):2620-3. PubMed ID: 8567894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the Biostar Chlamydia OIA assay with specimens from women attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic. Pate MS; Dixon PB; Hardy K; Crosby M; Hook EW J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Aug; 36(8):2183-6. PubMed ID: 9665987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Head-to-head evaluation of five chlamydia tests relative to a quality-assured culture standard. Newhall WJ; Johnson RE; DeLisle S; Fine D; Hadgu A; Matsuda B; Osmond D; Campbell J; Stamm WE J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Mar; 37(3):681-5. PubMed ID: 9986831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assays in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis: how valid are they? Weismeier E; Bruckner DA; Malotte CK; Manduke L Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1988 Apr; 9(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 3180707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of Pharmacia Chlamydia EIA for diagnosis of genital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis. Chan SW Pathology; 1993 Jan; 25(1):68-70. PubMed ID: 8316503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a nonisotopic probe for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens. Woods GL; Young A; Scott JC; Blair TM; Johnson AM J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Feb; 28(2):370-2. PubMed ID: 2179265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigens by enzyme immunoassay and immunofluorescence in genital specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men and women. Chernesky MA; Mahony JB; Castriciano S; Mores M; Stewart IO; Landis SJ; Seidelman W; Sargeant EJ; Leman C J Infect Dis; 1986 Jul; 154(1):141-8. PubMed ID: 3519787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of enzyme immunoassay and immunofluorescence tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. Hipp SS; Han Y; Murphy D J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Oct; 25(10):1938-43. PubMed ID: 3312290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A 1-year evaluation of Syva MicroTrak Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay with selective confirmation by direct fluorescent-antibody assay in a high-volume laboratory. Chan EL; Brandt K; Horsman GB J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Sep; 32(9):2208-11. PubMed ID: 7814548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the Kallested Pathfinder EIA, cytocentrifuged direct fluorescent antibody, and cell culture for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. LeBar W; Schubiner H; Jemal C; Herschman B; Criswell K; Curtin N; Sherbeck M Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1991; 14(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 2013206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of three immunoassays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from asymptomatic males. Leonardi GP; Seitz M; Edstrom R; Cruz J; Costello P; Szabo K J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Nov; 30(11):2793-6. PubMed ID: 1452648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women attending urban midwestern family planning and community health clinics: risk factors, selective screening, and evaluation of non-culture techniques. Addiss DG; Vaughn ML; Golubjatnikov R; Pfister J; Kurtycz DF; Davis JP Sex Transm Dis; 1990; 17(3):138-46. PubMed ID: 2247804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the microparticle enzyme immunoassay Abbott IMx Select Chlamydia and the importance of urethral site sampling to detect Chlamydia trachomatis in women. Brokenshire MK; Say PJ; van Vonno AH; Wong C Genitourin Med; 1997 Dec; 73(6):498-502. PubMed ID: 9582469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chlamydia trachomatis antigen detection by Chlamydiazyme combined with Chlamydia Blocking Reagent verification. Zeeberg B; Thelin I; Schalén C Int J STD AIDS; 1992; 3(5):355-9. PubMed ID: 1391063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of a commercial enzyme immunoassay versus culture for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. Bäckman M; Rudén AK; Ringertz O; Sanström EG Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1989 Sep; 8(9):778-82. PubMed ID: 2480238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction, monoclonal antibody based enzyme immunoassay, and cell culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens. Wu CH; Lee MF; Yin SC; Yang DM; Cheng SF Sex Transm Dis; 1992; 19(4):193-7. PubMed ID: 1411833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of sequential enzyme immunoassay and direct fluorescent antibody tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women. Schwebke JR; Stamm WE; Handsfield HH J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Nov; 28(11):2473-6. PubMed ID: 2254422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]