134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32850384)
1. Impact of Inter-fractional Anatomical Changes on Dose Distributions in Passive Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: Comparison of Vertical and Horizontal Fields.
Yokoyama A; Kubota Y; Kawamura H; Miyasaka Y; Kubo N; Sato H; Abe S; Tsuda K; Sutou T; Ohno T; Nakano T
Front Oncol; 2020; 10():1264. PubMed ID: 32850384
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Robustness of daily dose for each beam angle and accumulated dose for inter-fractional anatomical changes in passive carbon-ion radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer: Bone matching versus tumor matching.
Kubota Y; Okamoto M; Shiba S; Okazaki S; Matsui T; Li Y; Itabashi Y; Sakai M; Kubo N; Tsuda K; Ohno T; Nakano T
Radiother Oncol; 2021 Apr; 157():85-92. PubMed ID: 33515667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Positioning accuracy and daily dose assessment for prostate cancer treatment using in-room CT image guidance at a proton therapy facility.
Maeda Y; Sato Y; Minami H; Yasukawa Y; Yamamoto K; Tamamura H; Shibata S; Bou S; Sasaki M; Tameshige Y; Kume K; Ooto H; Kasahara S; Shimizu Y; Saga Y; Omoya A; Saitou M
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1832-1843. PubMed ID: 29532489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetric effects of the prone and supine positions on image guided localized prostate cancer radiotherapy.
Liu B; Lerma FA; Patel S; Amin P; Feng Y; Yi BY; Yu C
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 18207595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Technical Note: Predicting dose distribution with replacing stopping power ratio for inter-fractional motion and intra-fractional motion during carbon ion radiotherapy with passive irradiation method for stage I lung cancer.
Kubota Y; Sakai M; Tashiro M; Saitoh JI; Abe T; Ohno T; Nakano T
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3435-3441. PubMed ID: 29757472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robustness of patient positioning for interfractional error in carbon ion radiotherapy for stage I lung cancer: Bone matching versus tumor matching.
Sakai M; Kubota Y; Saitoh JI; Irie D; Shirai K; Okada R; Torikoshi M; Ohno T; Nakano T
Radiother Oncol; 2018 Oct; 129(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 29100701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between bone matching and marker matching for evaluation of intra- and inter-fractional changes in accumulated dose of carbon ion radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Kubota Y; Katoh H; Shibuya K; Shiba S; Abe S; Sakai M; Yuasa D; Tsuda K; Ohno T; Nakano T
Radiother Oncol; 2019 Aug; 137():77-82. PubMed ID: 31078014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing 3-, 4- and 6-fields techniques for conformal irradiation of prostate and seminal vesicles using dose-volume histograms.
Fiorino C; Reni M; Cattaneo GM; Bolognesi A; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 1997 Sep; 44(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 9380824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of image-guided patient repositioning and online planning in localized prostate cancer IMRT.
Lerma FA; Liu B; Wang Z; Yi B; Amin P; Liu S; Feng Y; Yu CX
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 19592122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Monte-Carlo study to assess the effect of 1.5 T magnetic fields on the overall robustness of pencil-beam scanning proton radiotherapy plans for prostate cancer.
Kurz C; Landry G; Resch AF; Dedes G; Kamp F; Ganswindt U; Belka C; Raaymakers BW; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Oct; 62(21):8470-8482. PubMed ID: 29047455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of organ motion on proton prostate treatments, as determined from analysis of daily CT imaging for patient positioning.
Maeda Y; Sato Y; Shibata S; Bou S; Yamamoto K; Tamamura H; Fuwa N; Takamatsu S; Sasaki M; Tameshige Y; Kume K; Minami H; Saga Y; Saito M
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1844-1856. PubMed ID: 29574901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The potential failure risk of the cone-beam computed tomography-based planning target volume margin definition for prostate image-guided radiotherapy based on a prospective single-institutional hybrid analysis.
Hirose K; Sato M; Hatayama Y; Kawaguchi H; Komai F; Sohma M; Obara H; Suzuki M; Tanaka M; Fujioka I; Ichise K; Takai Y; Aoki M
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Jun; 13(1):106. PubMed ID: 29880006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CT-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for bladder cancer: isocentre shifts, margins and their impact on target dose.
Redpath AT; Muren LP
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Dec; 81(3):276-83. PubMed ID: 17113669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of interpatient and intrapatient rectum variation on external beam treatment of prostate cancer.
Yan D; Xu B; Lockman D; Kota K; Brabbins DS; Wong J; Martinez AA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Nov; 51(4):1111-9. PubMed ID: 11704336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The comparison of radiotherapy techniques for treatment of the prostate cancer: the three-field vs. the four-field.
Milecki P; Piotrowski T; Dymnicka M
Neoplasma; 2004; 51(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 15004663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variation in patient position and impact on carbon-ion scanning beam distribution during prostate treatment.
Mori S; Inaniwa T; Miki K; Tanimoto K; Tajiri M; Kuroiwa D; Nakao M; Shiraishi Y; Shibayama K; Tsuji H
Br J Radiol; 2015 Jul; 88(1051):20140623. PubMed ID: 25950822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantification and predictors of prostate position variability in 50 patients evaluated with multiple CT scans during conformal radiotherapy.
Zelefsky MJ; Crean D; Mageras GS; Lyass O; Happersett L; Ling CC; Leibel SA; Fuks Z; Bull S; Kooy HM; van Herk M; Kutcher GJ
Radiother Oncol; 1999 Feb; 50(2):225-34. PubMed ID: 10368047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 4D-Listmode-PET-CT and 4D-CT for optimizing PTV margins in gastric lymphoma : Determination of intra- and interfractional gastric motion.
Reinartz G; Haverkamp U; Wullenkord R; Lehrich P; Kriz J; Büther F; Schäfers K; Schäfers M; Eich HT
Strahlenther Onkol; 2016 May; 192(5):322-32. PubMed ID: 26902523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vivo verification of proton beam path by using post-treatment PET/CT imaging.
Hsi WC; Indelicato DJ; Vargas C; Duvvuri S; Li Z; Palta J
Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):4136-46. PubMed ID: 19810487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating the benefit of PBS vs. VMAT dose distributions in terms of dosimetric sparing and robustness against inter-fraction anatomical changes for pediatric abdominal tumors.
Guerreiro F; Zachiu C; Seravalli E; Ribeiro CO; Janssens GO; Ries M; de Senneville BD; Maduro JH; Brouwer CL; Korevaar EW; Knopf AC; Raaymakers BW
Radiother Oncol; 2019 Sep; 138():158-165. PubMed ID: 31302390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
