BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32850433)

  • 1. Prognostic Assessment of Cervical Cancer Patients by Clinical Staging and Surgical-Pathological Factor: A Support Vector Machine-Based Approach.
    Xie L; Chu R; Wang K; Zhang X; Li J; Zhao Z; Yao S; Wang Z; Dong T; Yang X; Su X; Qiao X; Song K; Kong B
    Front Oncol; 2020; 10():1353. PubMed ID: 32850433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
    Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Para-aortic lymph node involvement revisited in the light of the revised 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer.
    Ayhan A; Aslan K; Öz M; Tohma YA; Kuşçu E; Meydanli MM
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 300(3):675-682. PubMed ID: 31263988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does the New FIGO 2018 Staging System Allow Better Prognostic Differentiation in Early Stage Cervical Cancer? A Dutch Nationwide Cohort Study.
    Ten Eikelder MLG; Hinten F; Smits A; Van der Aa MA; Bekkers RLM; IntHout J; Wenzel HHB; Zusterzeel PLM
    Cancers (Basel); 2022 Jun; 14(13):. PubMed ID: 35804912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pretreatment Lymph Node Metastasis as a Prognostic Significance in Cervical Cancer: Comparison between Disease Status.
    Jeong SY; Park H; Kim MS; Kang JH; Paik ES; Lee YY; Kim TJ; Lee JW; Kim BG; Bae DS; Choi CH
    Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Apr; 52(2):516-523. PubMed ID: 31671937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A model for prediction of parametrial involvement and feasibility of less radical resection of parametrium in patients with FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer.
    Chang SJ; Bristow RE; Ryu HS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jul; 126(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 22516661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preoperative platelet count improves the prognostic prediction of the FIGO staging system for operable cervical cancer patients.
    Zheng RR; Huang XX; Jin C; Zhuang XX; Ye LC; Zheng FY; Lin F
    Clin Chim Acta; 2017 Oct; 473():198-203. PubMed ID: 27836106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Parametrial involvement in FIGO stage IB1 cervical carcinoma diagnostic impact of tumor diameter in preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.
    Kamimori T; Sakamoto K; Fujiwara K; Umayahara K; Sugiyama Y; Utsugi K; Takeshima N; Tanaka H; Gomi N; Takizawa K
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Feb; 21(2):349-54. PubMed ID: 21721193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Clinical significance of serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen in patients with early cervical squamous cell carcinoma].
    Li D; Xu XX; Yan DD; Yuan SH; Lou HM
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2019 May; 41(5):357-362. PubMed ID: 31137169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prognostic value of the 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer patients with surgical risk factors.
    Yan DD; Tang Q; Chen JH; Tu YQ; Lv XJ
    Cancer Manag Res; 2019; 11():5473-5480. PubMed ID: 31354353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early cervical cancer and parametrial involvement: is it significant?
    Steed H; Capstick V; Schepansky A; Honore L; Hiltz M; Faught W
    Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Oct; 103(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 16516279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retrospective analysis for predictors of parametrial involvement in IB cervical cancer.
    Kubota S; Kobayashi E; Kakuda M; Matsuzaki S; Ueda Y; Yoshino K; Kimura T
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Mar; 45(3):679-685. PubMed ID: 30565810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preoperatively Assessable Clinical and Pathological Risk Factors for Parametrial Involvement in Surgically Treated FIGO Stage IB-IIA Cervical Cancer.
    Canaz E; Ozyurek ES; Erdem B; Aldikactioglu Talmac M; Yildiz Ozaydin I; Akbayir O; Numanoglu C; Ulker V
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Oct; 27(8):1722-1728. PubMed ID: 28617687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer: clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic evaluation.
    Kasamatsu T; Onda T; Sawada M; Kato T; Ikeda S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jul; 114(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 19398126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Overexpression of eukaryotic initiation factor 5A2 (EIF5A2) is associated with cancer progression and poor prognosis in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
    Yang SS; Gao Y; Wang DY; Xia BR; Liu YD; Qin Y; Ning XM; Li GY; Hao LX; Xiao M; Zhang YY
    Histopathology; 2016 Aug; 69(2):276-87. PubMed ID: 26799253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Analysis of prognostic factors in patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma of stage Ib and IIa].
    Chen L; Lü WG; Xie X; Chen HZ; Yu H; Ni XH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Apr; 40(4):239-42. PubMed ID: 15924669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multivariate analysis of histopathologic prognostic factors for invasive cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy and systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy.
    Takeda N; Sakuragi N; Takeda M; Okamoto K; Kuwabara M; Negishi H; Oikawa M; Yamamoto R; Yamada H; Fujimoto S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2002 Dec; 81(12):1144-51. PubMed ID: 12519111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Satellite lymphovascular space invasion: An independent risk factor in early stage cervical cancer.
    Pol FJ; Zusterzeel PL; van Ham MA; Kuijpers DA; Bulten J; Massuger LF
    Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Sep; 138(3):579-84. PubMed ID: 26126782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk Stratification of Early-Stage Cervical Cancer with Intermediate-Risk Factors: Model Development and Validation Based on Machine Learning Algorithm.
    Chu R; Zhang Y; Qiao X; Xie L; Chen W; Zhao Y; Xu Y; Yuan Z; Liu X; Yin A; Wang Z; Zhang Q; Yang X; Su X; Kong B; Song K
    Oncologist; 2021 Dec; 26(12):e2217-e2226. PubMed ID: 34427018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Significance of tumor size and number of positive nodes in patients with FIGO 2018 stage IIIC1 cervical cancer.
    Maeda M; Mabuchi S; Sakata M; Deguchi S; Kakubari R; Matsuzaki S; Hisa T; Kamiura S
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2024 Feb; 54(2):146-152. PubMed ID: 37935434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.