These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32851568)

  • 1. The effects of numeracy and presentation format on judgments of contingency.
    Cooper S; Vallée-Tourangeau F
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Feb; 49(2):389-399. PubMed ID: 32851568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Self-truncated sampling produces more moderate covariation judgment and related decision than descriptive frequency information: The role of regressive frequency estimation.
    Zhang X; Dai J
    Psych J; 2024 Apr; 13(2):201-215. PubMed ID: 38105552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Money matters (especially if you are good at math): Numeracy, verbal intelligence, education, and income in satisfaction judgments.
    Bjälkebring P; Peters E
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0259331. PubMed ID: 34818354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of numeracy on verbatim knowledge of the longitudinal risk for prostate cancer recurrence following radiation therapy.
    Hamstra DA; Johnson SB; Daignault S; Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Taylor JM; Larkin K; Wood A; Fagerlin A
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Jan; 35(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 25277673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of home care nurses' numeracy and graph literacy on comprehension of visual display information: implications for dashboard design.
    Dowding D; Merrill JA; Onorato N; Barrón Y; Rosati RJ; Russell D
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2018 Feb; 25(2):175-182. PubMed ID: 28460091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When and for whom do frequencies facilitate performance? On the role of numerical literacy.
    Hill WT; Brase GL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(12):2343-68. PubMed ID: 22630143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of the number of relevant causes on the processing of covariation information in causal reasoning.
    Kim K; Markman AB; Kim TH
    Cogn Process; 2016 Nov; 17(4):399-413. PubMed ID: 27312597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strategy selection in causal reasoning: when beliefs and covariation collide.
    Fugelsang JA; Thompson VA
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2000 Mar; 54(1):15-32. PubMed ID: 10721236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Towards an understanding of adult judgments of synergistic health benefits.
    Dawson IG; Dohle S
    Br J Health Psychol; 2016 Feb; 21(1):204-23. PubMed ID: 26353849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sample representativeness affects whether judgments are influenced by base rate or sample size.
    Obrecht NA; Chesney DL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Mar; 142(3):370-82. PubMed ID: 23422291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fostering the Understanding of Positive Test Results.
    Pighin S; Tentori K; Savadori L; Girotto V
    Ann Behav Med; 2018 Oct; 52(11):909-919. PubMed ID: 30346498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing the impact of an icon array versus a bar graph on preference and understanding of risk information: Results from an online, randomized study.
    Scalia P; Schubbe DC; Lu ES; Durand MA; Frascara J; Noel G; O'Malley AJ; Elwyn G
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0253644. PubMed ID: 34297713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age, numeracy, and cultural differences in Chinese and American adolescents' performance on the ratio bias task.
    Klaczynski PA; Amsel EA; Felmban WS
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Dec; 188():104669. PubMed ID: 31430568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of numeracy on the comprehension of information about medicines in users of a patient information website.
    Gardner PH; McMillan B; Raynor DK; Woolf E; Knapp P
    Patient Educ Couns; 2011 Jun; 83(3):398-403. PubMed ID: 21621949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Causal evidence in risk and policy perceptions: Applying the covariation/mechanism framework.
    Baucum M; John R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 May; 186():90-103. PubMed ID: 29627061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Explaining the forgetting bias effect on value judgments: The influence of memory for a past test.
    Rhodes MG; Witherby AE; Castel AD; Murayama K
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Apr; 45(3):362-374. PubMed ID: 27873187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The experience-based format of probability improves probability estimates: The moderating role of individual differences in numeracy.
    Traczyk J; Sobkow A; Matukiewicz A; Petrova D; Garcia-Retamero R
    Int J Psychol; 2020 Apr; 55(2):273-281. PubMed ID: 30690731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Causal judgment from contingency information: relation between subjective reports and individual tendencies in judgment.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Apr; 28(3):415-26. PubMed ID: 10881559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Communicating Relative Risk Changes with Baseline Risk: Presentation Format and Numeracy Matter.
    Bodemer N; Meder B; Gigerenzer G
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Jul; 34(5):615-26. PubMed ID: 24803429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Driven by power? Probe question and presentation format effects on causal judgment.
    Perales JC; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1482-94. PubMed ID: 18980409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.