These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32851689)

  • 1. Conservation lessons from taboos and trolley problems.
    Schwartz MW
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Jun; 35(3):794-803. PubMed ID: 32851689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Thinking the unthinkable: sacred values and taboo cognitions.
    Tetlock PE
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2003 Jul; 7(7):320-324. PubMed ID: 12860191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The psychology of the unthinkable: taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals.
    Tetlock PE; Kristel OV; Elson SB; Green MC; Lerner JS
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2000 May; 78(5):853-70. PubMed ID: 10821194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating taboo trade-offs in ecosystems services and human well-being.
    Daw TM; Coulthard S; Cheung WW; Brown K; Abunge C; Galafassi D; Peterson GD; McClanahan TR; Omukoto JO; Munyi L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Jun; 112(22):6949-54. PubMed ID: 26038547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Insights from life history theory for an explicit treatment of trade-offs in conservation biology.
    Charpentier A
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):738-47. PubMed ID: 25580848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Linking ecosystem services and human-values theory.
    Hicks CC; Cinner JE; Stoeckl N; McClanahan TR
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Oct; 29(5):1471-80. PubMed ID: 26129942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An introduction to decision science for conservation.
    Hemming V; Camaclang AE; Adams MS; Burgman M; Carbeck K; Carwardine J; Chadès I; Chalifour L; Converse SJ; Davidson LNK; Garrard GE; Finn R; Fleri JR; Huard J; Mayfield HJ; Madden EM; Naujokaitis-Lewis I; Possingham HP; Rumpff L; Runge MC; Stewart D; Tulloch VJD; Walshe T; Martin TG
    Conserv Biol; 2022 Feb; 36(1):e13868. PubMed ID: 34856010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acknowledging conservation trade-offs and embracing complexity.
    Hirsch PD; Adams WM; Brosius JP; Zia A; Bariola N; Dammert JL
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Apr; 25(2):259-64. PubMed ID: 21091769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantifying trade-offs between ecological gains, economic costs, and landowners' preferences in boreal mire protection.
    Nieminen E; Kareksela S; Halme P; Kotiaho JS
    Ambio; 2021 Oct; 50(10):1841-1850. PubMed ID: 33825157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are morally motivated decision makers insensitive to the consequences of their choices?
    Bartels DM; Medin DL
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Jan; 18(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 17362373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The links between protected areas, faiths, and sacred natural sites.
    Dudley N; Higgins-Zogib L; Mansourian S
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Jun; 23(3):568-77. PubMed ID: 22748093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wildlife use and the role of taboos in the conservation of wildlife around the Nkwende Hills Forest Reserve; South-west Cameroon.
    Bobo KS; Aghomo FF; Ntumwel BC
    J Ethnobiol Ethnomed; 2015 Jan; 11(1):2. PubMed ID: 25567094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cautioning against overemphasis of normative constructs in conservation decision making.
    Yanco E; Nelson MP; Ramp D
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Oct; 33(5):1002-1013. PubMed ID: 30734367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Agreed but not preferred: expert views on taboo options for biodiversity conservation, given climate change.
    Hagerman SM; Satterfield T
    Ecol Appl; 2014 Apr; 24(3):548-59. PubMed ID: 24834740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identifying trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services delivery for land-use decisions.
    Fastré C; Possingham HP; Strubbe D; Matthysen E
    Sci Rep; 2020 May; 10(1):7971. PubMed ID: 32409694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. No net loss for people and biodiversity.
    Griffiths VF; Bull JW; Baker J; Milner-Gulland EJ
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Feb; 33(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 30070731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The moral residue of conservation.
    Batavia C; Nelson MP; Wallach AD
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Oct; 34(5):1114-1121. PubMed ID: 31953967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Equity trade-offs in conservation decision making.
    Law EA; Bennett NJ; Ives CD; Friedman R; Davis KJ; Archibald C; Wilson KA
    Conserv Biol; 2018 Apr; 32(2):294-303. PubMed ID: 28861904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. From adaptive management to adjustive management: a pragmatic account of biodiversity values.
    Maris V; Béchet A
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Aug; 24(4):966-73. PubMed ID: 20151986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ethics and biodiversity offsetting.
    Karlsson M; Edvardsson Björnberg K
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Apr; 35(2):578-586. PubMed ID: 32757221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.