These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32851707)

  • 1. Head-to-head comparison of cardiovascular MR feature tracking cine versus acquisition-based deformation strain imaging using myocardial tagging and strain encoding.
    Backhaus SJ; Metschies G; Zieschang V; Erley J; Mahsa Zamani S; Kowallick JT; Lapinskas T; Pieske B; Lotz J; Kutty S; Hasenfuß G; Kelle S; Schuster A
    Magn Reson Med; 2021 Jan; 85(1):357-368. PubMed ID: 32851707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of feature tracking, fast-SENC, and myocardial tagging for global and segmental left ventricular strain.
    Bucius P; Erley J; Tanacli R; Zieschang V; Giusca S; Korosoglou G; Steen H; Stehning C; Pieske B; Pieske-Kraigher E; Schuster A; Lapinskas T; Kelle S
    ESC Heart Fail; 2020 Apr; 7(2):523-532. PubMed ID: 31800152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A head-to-head comparison of fast-SENC and feature tracking to LV long axis strain for assessment of myocardial deformation in chest pain patients.
    Siry D; Riffel J; Salatzki J; André F; Weberling LD; Ochs M; Atia NA; Hillier E; Albert D; Katus HA; Giannitsis E; Frey N; Friedrich MG
    BMC Med Imaging; 2022 Sep; 22(1):159. PubMed ID: 36064332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multivendor comparison of global and regional 2D cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking strains vs tissue tagging at 3T.
    Militaru S; Panovsky R; Hanet V; Amzulescu MS; Langet H; Pisciotti MM; Pouleur AC; Vanoverschelde JJ; Gerber BL
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2021 May; 23(1):54. PubMed ID: 33980259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Strain-Encoding and Feature-Tracking Derived Myocardial Deformation Assessment of Left Ventricular Function in a Pediatric and Adult Congenital Heart Disease Cohort.
    Chew JD; George-Durrett K; Acheampong B; Weiner JG; Slaughter JC; Parra DA; Soslow JH
    Pediatr Cardiol; 2022 Aug; 43(6):1338-1348. PubMed ID: 35238958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance based evaluation of myocardial strain and relationship with late gadolinium enhancement.
    Erley J; Genovese D; Tapaskar N; Alvi N; Rashedi N; Besser SA; Kawaji K; Goyal N; Kelle S; Lang RM; Mor-Avi V; Patel AR
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2019 Aug; 21(1):46. PubMed ID: 31391036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of both DENSE and feature tracking techniques with tagging for the cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of myocardial strain.
    Cao JJ; Ngai N; Duncanson L; Cheng J; Gliganic K; Chen Q
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Apr; 20(1):26. PubMed ID: 29669563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantification of global myocardial function by cine MRI deformable registration-based analysis: Comparison with MR feature tracking and speckle-tracking echocardiography.
    Lamacie MM; Thavendiranathan P; Hanneman K; Greiser A; Jolly MP; Ward R; Wintersperger BJ
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Apr; 27(4):1404-1415. PubMed ID: 27491873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A head-to-head comparison of myocardial strain by fast-strain encoding and feature tracking imaging in acute myocardial infarction.
    El-Saadi W; Engvall JE; Alfredsson J; Karlsson JE; Martins M; Sederholm S; Faisal Zaman S; Ebbers T; Kihlberg J
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2022; 9():949440. PubMed ID: 35966533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Global and regional left ventricular myocardial deformation measures by magnetic resonance feature tracking in healthy volunteers: comparison with tagging and relevance of gender.
    Augustine D; Lewandowski AJ; Lazdam M; Rai A; Francis J; Myerson S; Noble A; Becher H; Neubauer S; Petersen SE; Leeson P
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2013 Jan; 15(1):8. PubMed ID: 23331550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Left ventricular global myocardial strain assessment comparing the reproducibility of four commercially available CMR-feature tracking algorithms.
    Barreiro-Pérez M; Curione D; Symons R; Claus P; Voigt JU; Bogaert J
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Dec; 28(12):5137-5147. PubMed ID: 29872912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A multi-vendor, multi-center study on reproducibility and comparability of fast strain-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.
    Erley J; Zieschang V; Lapinskas T; Demir A; Wiesemann S; Haass M; Osman NF; Simonetti OP; Liu Y; Patel AR; Mor-Avi V; Unal O; Johnson KM; Pieske B; Hansmann J; Schulz-Menger J; Kelle S
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 May; 36(5):899-911. PubMed ID: 32056087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inter-study repeatability of circumferential strain and diastolic strain rate by CMR tagging, feature tracking and tissue tracking in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
    Nazir SA; Shetye AM; Khan JN; Singh A; Arnold JR; Squire I; McCann GP
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Jun; 36(6):1133-1146. PubMed ID: 32152811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging feature tracking: Impact of training on observer performance and reproducibility.
    Backhaus SJ; Metschies G; Billing M; Kowallick JT; Gertz RJ; Lapinskas T; Pieske B; Lotz J; Bigalke B; Kutty S; Hasenfuß G; Beerbaum P; Kelle S; Schuster A
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210127. PubMed ID: 30682045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Left-Ventricular Reference Myocardial Strain Assessed by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking and fSENC-Impact of Temporal Resolution and Cardiac Muscle Mass.
    Weise Valdés E; Barth P; Piran M; Laser KT; Burchert W; Körperich H
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2021; 8():764496. PubMed ID: 34796219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproducibility study on myocardial strain assessment using fast-SENC cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
    Giusca S; Korosoglou G; Zieschang V; Stoiber L; Schnackenburg B; Stehning C; Gebker R; Pieske B; Schuster A; Backhaus S; Pieske-Kraigher E; Patel A; Kawaji K; Steen H; Lapinskas T; Kelle S
    Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):14100. PubMed ID: 30237411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproducibility and Intervendor Agreement of Left Ventricular Global Systolic Strain in Children Using a Layer-Specific Analysis.
    Ramlogan S; Aly D; France R; Schmidt S; Hinzman J; Sherman A; Goudar SP; Forsha D
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2020 Jan; 33(1):110-119. PubMed ID: 31668503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Myocardial strain analysis of the right ventricle: comparison of different cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiographic techniques.
    Erley J; Tanacli R; Genovese D; Tapaskar N; Rashedi N; Bucius P; Kawaji K; Karagodin I; Lang RM; Kelle S; Mor-Avi V; Patel AR
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2020 Jul; 22(1):51. PubMed ID: 32698811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inter-vendor reproducibility of left and right ventricular cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature-tracking.
    Gertz RJ; Lange T; Kowallick JT; Backhaus SJ; Steinmetz M; Staab W; Kutty S; Hasenfuß G; Lotz J; Schuster A
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193746. PubMed ID: 29538467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MRI-Derived Myocardial Strain Measures in Normal Subjects.
    Vo HQ; Marwick TH; Negishi K
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Feb; 11(2 Pt 1):196-205. PubMed ID: 28528164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.