These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32851743)

  • 1. Editorial for "Effect of Device Configuration and Patient's Body Composition on the Nonsusceptibility Artifact and RF Heating of Deep Brain Stimulation Devices During MRI at 1.5T and 3T".
    Kremser C
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Feb; 53(2):611-612. PubMed ID: 32851743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Device Configuration and Patient's Body Composition on the RF Heating and Nonsusceptibility Artifact of Deep Brain Stimulation Implants During MRI at 1.5T and 3T.
    Bhusal B; Nguyen BT; Sanpitak PP; Vu J; Elahi B; Rosenow J; Nolt MJ; Lopez-Rosado R; Pilitsis J; DiMarzio M; Golestanirad L
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Feb; 53(2):599-610. PubMed ID: 32860322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Device Configuration and Patient's Body Composition Significantly Affect RF Heating of Deep Brain Stimulation Implants During MRI: An Experimental Study at 1.5T and 3T.
    Bhusal B; Nguyen BT; Vu J; Elahi B; Rosenow J; Nolt MJ; Pilitsis J; DiMarzio M; Golestanirad L
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():5192-5197. PubMed ID: 33019155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [MRI compatibility of deep brain stimulator].
    Zhang Y
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2013 Jul; 37(4):244-7. PubMed ID: 24195387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. RF-induced heating in tissue near bilateral DBS implants during MRI at 1.5 T and 3T: The role of surgical lead management.
    Golestanirad L; Kirsch J; Bonmassar G; Downs S; Elahi B; Martin A; Iacono MI; Angelone LM; Keil B; Wald LL; Pilitsis J
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 184():566-576. PubMed ID: 30243973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Functional MRI Safety and Artifacts during Deep Brain Stimulation: Experience in 102 Patients.
    Boutet A; Rashid T; Hancu I; Elias GJB; Gramer RM; Germann J; Dimarzio M; Li B; Paramanandam V; Prasad S; Ranjan M; Coblentz A; Gwun D; Chow CT; Maciel R; Soh D; Fiveland E; Hodaie M; Kalia SK; Fasano A; Kucharczyk W; Pilitsis J; Lozano AM
    Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):174-183. PubMed ID: 31385756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reconfigurable MRI technology for low-SAR imaging of deep brain stimulation at 3T: Application in bilateral leads, fully-implanted systems, and surgically modified lead trajectories.
    Kazemivalipour E; Keil B; Vali A; Rajan S; Elahi B; Atalar E; Wald LL; Rosenow J; Pilitsis J; Golestanirad L
    Neuroimage; 2019 Oct; 199():18-29. PubMed ID: 31096058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ultra-high magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): a potential examination for deep brain stimulation devices and the limitation study concerning MRI-related heating injury.
    Chen YC; Li JJ; Zhu GY; Shi L; Yang AC; Jiang Y; Zhang X; Zhang JG
    Neurol Sci; 2017 Mar; 38(3):485-488. PubMed ID: 27878650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of patient orientations, landmark positions, and device positions on the MRI RF-induced heating for modular external fixation devices.
    Xia M; Zheng J; Yang R; Song S; Xu J; Liu Q; Kainz W; Long SA; Chen J
    Magn Reson Med; 2021 Mar; 85(3):1669-1680. PubMed ID: 32970911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deep brain stimulation lead-contact heating during 3T MRI: single- versus dual-channel pulse generator configurations.
    Nazzaro JM; Klemp JA; Brooks WM; Cook-Wiens G; Mayo MS; Van Acker GM; Lyons KE; Cheney PD
    Int J Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 124(3):166-74. PubMed ID: 24000873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A simple geometric analysis method for measuring and mitigating RF induced currents on Deep Brain Stimulation leads by multichannel transmission/reception.
    Eryaman Y; Kobayashi N; Moen S; Aman J; Grant A; Vaughan JT; Molnar G; Park MC; Vitek J; Adriany G; Ugurbil K; Harel N
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 184():658-668. PubMed ID: 30273715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Significant Artifact Reduction at 1.5T and 3T MRI by the Use of a Cochlear Implant with Removable Magnet: An Experimental Human Cadaver Study.
    Wagner F; Wimmer W; Leidolt L; Vischer M; Weder S; Wiest R; Mantokoudis G; Caversaccio MD
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132483. PubMed ID: 26200775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Metal Artifact Reduction in Head CT Performed for Patients with Deep Brain Stimulation Devices: Effectiveness of a Single-Energy Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm.
    Nagayama Y; Tanoue S; Oda S; Sakabe D; Emoto T; Kidoh M; Uetani H; Sasao A; Nakaura T; Ikeda O; Yamada K; Yamashita Y
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2020 Feb; 41(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 31879332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Heating sensation in patients with and without spinal fixation devices during MRI examination at different magnetic field strengths.
    Yamaguchi T; Abe Y; Ichino Y; Satoh S; Masuda T; Kimura S; Ito M; Yamamoto T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Feb; 49(2):525-533. PubMed ID: 30318643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MRI interactions of a fully implantable pressure monitoring device.
    Stehlin EF; McCormick D; Malpas SC; Pontré BP; Heppner PA; Budgett DM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Nov; 42(5):1441-9. PubMed ID: 25865598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 1.5T versus 3T MRI for targeting subthalamic nucleus for deep brain stimulation.
    Cheng CH; Huang HM; Lin HL; Chiou SM
    Br J Neurosurg; 2014 Aug; 28(4):467-70. PubMed ID: 24191703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computational and experimental investigation of RF-induced heating for multiple orthopedic implants.
    Guo R; Zheng J; Wang Y; Zeng Q; Wang Q; Yang R; Kainz W; Chen J
    Magn Reson Med; 2019 Nov; 82(5):1848-1858. PubMed ID: 31183897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Magnetic resonance imaging conditionally safe neurostimulation leads: investigation of the maximum safe lead tip temperature.
    Coffey RJ; Kalin R; Olsen JM
    Neurosurgery; 2014 Feb; 74(2):215-24; discussion 224-5. PubMed ID: 24176957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervical external immobilization devices: evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging issues at 3.0 Tesla.
    Diaz FL; Tweardy L; Shellock FG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Feb; 35(4):411-5. PubMed ID: 20110847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonsusceptibility artifacts due to metallic objects in MR imaging.
    Camacho CR; Plewes DB; Henkelman RM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 5(1):75-88. PubMed ID: 7696813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.