These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3285193)
1. Genetic toxicology: can we design predictive in vivo assays? Clive D Mutat Res; 1988; 205(1-4):313-30. PubMed ID: 3285193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The comet assay with multiple mouse organs: comparison of comet assay results and carcinogenicity with 208 chemicals selected from the IARC monographs and U.S. NTP Carcinogenicity Database. Sasaki YF; Sekihashi K; Izumiyama F; Nishidate E; Saga A; Ishida K; Tsuda S Crit Rev Toxicol; 2000 Nov; 30(6):629-799. PubMed ID: 11145306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity. Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop. Kirkland D; Pfuhler S; Tweats D; Aardema M; Corvi R; Darroudi F; Elhajouji A; Glatt H; Hastwell P; Hayashi M; Kasper P; Kirchner S; Lynch A; Marzin D; Maurici D; Meunier JR; Müller L; Nohynek G; Parry J; Parry E; Thybaud V; Tice R; van Benthem J; Vanparys P; White P Mutat Res; 2007 Mar; 628(1):31-55. PubMed ID: 17293159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles. Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The prospects for a simplified and internationally harmonized approach to the detection of possible human carcinogens and mutagens. Ashby J Mutagenesis; 1986 Jan; 1(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 3325732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Significance of the genotoxic activities observed in vitro for 35 of 70 NTP noncarcinogens. Ashby J; Purchase IF Environ Mutagen; 1985; 7(5):747-58. PubMed ID: 3899632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of the National Toxicology Program data on in vitro genetic toxicity tests using multivariate statistical methods. Benigni R Mutagenesis; 1989 Nov; 4(6):412-9. PubMed ID: 2695754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A core in vitro genotoxicity battery comprising the Ames test plus the in vitro micronucleus test is sufficient to detect rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins. Kirkland D; Reeve L; Gatehouse D; Vanparys P Mutat Res; 2011 Mar; 721(1):27-73. PubMed ID: 21238603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Testing strategies in mutagenicity and genetic toxicology: an appraisal of the guidelines of the European Scientific Committee for Cosmetics and Non-Food Products for the evaluation of hair dyes. Kirkland DJ; Henderson L; Marzin D; Müller L; Parry JM; Speit G; Tweats DJ; Williams GM Mutat Res; 2005 Dec; 588(2):88-105. PubMed ID: 16326131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis assay with mouse multiple organs: results with 30 aromatic amines evaluated by the IARC and U.S. NTP. Sasaki YF; Fujikawa K; Ishida K; Kawamura N; Nishikawa Y; Ohta S; Satoh M; Madarame H; Ueno S; Susa N; Matsusaka N; Tsuda S Mutat Res; 1999 Mar; 440(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 10095124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Data selection and treatment of chemicals tested for genotoxicity and carcinogenicity. Loprieno N; Boncristiani G; Loprieno G; Tesoro M Environ Health Perspect; 1991 Dec; 96():121-6. PubMed ID: 1820253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Classification according to chemical structure, mutagenicity to Salmonella and level of carcinogenicity of a further 42 chemicals tested for carcinogenicity by the U.S. National Toxicology Program. Ashby J; Tennant RW; Zeiger E; Stasiewicz S Mutat Res; 1989 Jun; 223(2):73-103. PubMed ID: 2662004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can in vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity test results be used to complement positive results in the Ames test and help predict carcinogenic or in vivo genotoxic activity? II. Construction and analysis of a consolidated database. Kirkland D; Zeiger E; Madia F; Corvi R Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2014 Dec; 775-776():69-80. PubMed ID: 25435357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of the sensitivity of the computational programs DEREK, TOPKAT, and MCASE in the prediction of the genotoxicity of pharmaceutical molecules. Snyder RD; Pearl GS; Mandakas G; Choy WN; Goodsaid F; Rosenblum IY Environ Mol Mutagen; 2004; 43(3):143-58. PubMed ID: 15065202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mouse-specific carcinogens: an assessment of hazard and significance for validation of short-term carcinogenicity bioassays in transgenic mice. Battershill JM; Fielder RJ Hum Exp Toxicol; 1998 Apr; 17(4):193-205. PubMed ID: 9617631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens. Vogel EW; Graf U; Frei HJ; Nivard MM IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):427-70. PubMed ID: 10353398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rational approach to the quantification of genotoxicity. Benigni R Environ Mol Mutagen; 1992; 19(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 1732108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Chemical structure, Salmonella mutagenicity and extent of carcinogenicity as indicators of genotoxic carcinogenesis among 222 chemicals tested in rodents by the U.S. NCI/NTP. Ashby J; Tennant RW Mutat Res; 1988 Jan; 204(1):17-115. PubMed ID: 3277047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]