167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32852261)
1. Evaluation of a stand-alone robotic camera holding system: technology that improves laparoscopy.
Rade M; Birkett D; Sherman J; Nepomnayshy D
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2022 Mar; 31(3):404-409. PubMed ID: 32852261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ergonomics in handheld and robot-assisted camera control: a randomized controlled trial.
Wijsman PJM; Molenaar L; Van't Hullenaar CDP; van Vugt BST; Bleeker WA; Draaisma WA; Broeders IAMJ
Surg Endosc; 2019 Dec; 33(12):3919-3925. PubMed ID: 30746574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic Camera Assistance: The Future of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery?
Ali JM; Lam K; Coonar AS
Surg Innov; 2018 Oct; 25(5):485-491. PubMed ID: 29938603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Initial experience using a robotic-driven laparoscopic needle holder with ergonomic handle: assessment of surgeons' task performance and ergonomics.
Sánchez-Margallo JA; Sánchez-Margallo FM
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Dec; 12(12):2069-2077. PubMed ID: 28695479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of robotic camera holders with human assistants in endoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wan GY; Zhou XY; Duan HX; Zou ZY; Zhang MM; Mao JB
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2023 Aug; 32(4):153-162. PubMed ID: 37051809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Robotic Camera Holder Controlled by Head Movements: Exploring This New Robot-Surgeon Interface.
Bucher JN; Bruewer K; Dietz LJ; Trebesius N; Hidding J; Wysocki M; Schoenberg MB; Werner J; Karcz K
Surg Innov; 2020 Oct; 27(5):499-506. PubMed ID: 32406783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative Study of Ergonomics in Conventional and Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery.
Pérez-Salazar MJ; Caballero D; Sánchez-Margallo JA; Sánchez-Margallo FM
Sensors (Basel); 2024 Jun; 24(12):. PubMed ID: 38931624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of a robotic camera holder (FreeHand
Mittal R; Sbaih M; Motson RW; Arulampalam T
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2020 Feb; 29(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 30789101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Bariatric Surgeon Ergonomics: A Comparison of Laparoscopy and Robotics.
Hilt L; Sherman B; Tan WH; Lak K; Gould JC; Kindel TL; Higgins RM
J Surg Res; 2024 Mar; 295():864-873. PubMed ID: 37968140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benefits of Robotic Camera Assistance in Minimally Invasive Bariatric Procedures: Prospective Clinical Trial Using a Joystick-Guided Camera-Holder.
Holländer SW; Klingen HJ; Hess S; Merscher A; Glanemann M; Birk D
Surg Technol Int; 2019 May; 34():87-92. PubMed ID: 30888669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic ergonomic risk.
Monfared S; Athanasiadis DI; Umana L; Hernandez E; Asadi H; Colgate CL; Yu D; Stefanidis D
Surg Endosc; 2022 Nov; 36(11):8397-8402. PubMed ID: 35182219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficiency in image-guided robotic and conventional camera steering: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Wijsman PJM; Voskens FJ; Molenaar L; van 't Hullenaar CDP; Consten ECJ; Draaisma WA; Broeders IAMJ
Surg Endosc; 2022 Apr; 36(4):2334-2340. PubMed ID: 33977377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Camera and instrument holders and their clinical value in minimally invasive surgery.
Jaspers JE; Breedveld P; Herder JL; Grimbergen CA
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2004 Jun; 14(3):145-52. PubMed ID: 15471021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Decreasing strain on the surgeon in gynecologic minimally invasive surgery by using semi-active robotics.
Tchartchian G; Dietzel J; Bojahr B; Hackethal A; De Wilde R
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2011 Jan; 112(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 20947079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An ergonomic comfort workspace analysis of master manipulator for robotic laparoscopic surgery with motion scaled teleoperation system.
Kang D; Kwon DS
Int J Med Robot; 2022 Dec; 18(6):e2448. PubMed ID: 35986717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A systematic review of the true benefit of robotic surgery: Ergonomics.
Wee IJY; Kuo LJ; Ngu JC
Int J Med Robot; 2020 Aug; 16(4):e2113. PubMed ID: 32304167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combining of ETHOS Operating Ergonomic Platform, Three-dimensional Laparoscopic Camera, and Radius Surgical System Manipulators Improves Ergonomy in Urologic Laparoscopy: Comparison with Conventional Laparoscopy and da Vinci in a Pelvi Trainer.
Tokas T; Gözen AS; Avgeris M; Tschada A; Fiedler M; Klein J; Rassweiler J
Eur Urol Focus; 2017 Oct; 3(4-5):413-420. PubMed ID: 28753821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the Efficiency of a Joystick-Guided Robotic Scope Holder Compared to That of Human Scopists: A Prospective Trial.
Kudo T; Kanaji S; Harada H; Ohmura Y; Sawada R; Urakawa N; Goto H; Hasegawa H; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Oshikiri T; Kakeji Y
Surg Innov; 2023 Oct; 30(5):564-570. PubMed ID: 36788211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic Assistance Confers Ambidexterity to Laparoscopic Surgeons.
Choussein S; Srouji SS; Farland LV; Wietsma A; Missmer SA; Hollis M; Yu RN; Pozner CN; Gargiulo AR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 28734971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. First experience with THE AUTOLAP™ SYSTEM: an image-based robotic camera steering device.
Wijsman PJM; Broeders IAMJ; Brenkman HJ; Szold A; Forgione A; Schreuder HWR; Consten ECJ; Draaisma WA; Verheijen PM; Ruurda JP; Kaufman Y
Surg Endosc; 2018 May; 32(5):2560-2566. PubMed ID: 29101564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
