These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32852979)

  • 1. On making forecasts from binary sequences: Uncovering implicit cues.
    Beckstead JW; Pezzo MV
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Mar; 150(3):466-483. PubMed ID: 32852979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Competitive retrieval strategy causes multimodal response distributions in multiple-cue judgments.
    Albrecht R; Hoffmann JA; Pleskac TJ; Rieskamp J; von Helversen B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jun; 46(6):1064-1090. PubMed ID: 31750721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of common elements in the redundancy effect.
    Uengoer M; Lachnit H; Pearce JM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(3):286-296. PubMed ID: 32730082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Responses improve the accuracy of confidence judgements in memory tasks.
    Siedlecka M; Skóra Z; Paulewicz B; Fijałkowska S; Timmermans B; Wierzchoń M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(4):712-723. PubMed ID: 29999396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Explicit and implicit processes in multicue judgment.
    Evans JS; Clibbens J; Cattani A; Harris A; Dennis I
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Jun; 31(4):608-18. PubMed ID: 12872876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fast and frugal framing effects?
    McCloy R; Beaman CP; Frosch CA; Goddard K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1043-52. PubMed ID: 20565220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forecasting from ignorance: the use and usefulness of recognition in lay predictions of sports events.
    Pachur T; Biele G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 May; 125(1):99-116. PubMed ID: 16904059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nothing compares: Unraveling learning task effects in judgment and categorization.
    Trippas D; Pachur T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2239-2266. PubMed ID: 30998071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do children profit from looking beyond looks? From similarity-based to cue abstraction processes in multiple-cue judgment.
    von Helversen B; Mata R; Olsson H
    Dev Psychol; 2010 Jan; 46(1):220-9. PubMed ID: 20053019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How environmental regularities affect people's information search in probability judgments from experience.
    Hoffart JC; Rieskamp J; Dutilh G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):219-231. PubMed ID: 30024248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adaptive Anchoring Model: How Static and Dynamic Presentations of Time Series Influence Judgments and Predictions.
    Kusev P; van Schaik P; Tsaneva-Atanasova K; Juliusson A; Chater N
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Jan; 42(1):77-102. PubMed ID: 28382639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attractors: Incidental values that influence forecasts of change.
    Critcher CR; Rosenzweig EL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Feb; 151(2):475-492. PubMed ID: 34472959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simultaneous utilization of multiple cues in judgments of learning.
    Undorf M; Söllner A; Bröder A
    Mem Cognit; 2018 May; 46(4):507-519. PubMed ID: 29327336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Similar task features shape judgment and categorization processes.
    Hoffmann JA; von Helversen B; Rieskamp J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1193-217. PubMed ID: 26844574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Explaining the implicit negations effect in conditional inference: Experience, probabilities, and contrast sets.
    Vance J; Oaksford M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Feb; 150(2):354-384. PubMed ID: 32881565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating probabilistic forecasts with Bayesian signal detection models.
    Steyvers M; Wallsten TS; Merkle EC; Turner BM
    Risk Anal; 2014 Mar; 34(3):435-52. PubMed ID: 24147636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The future is now: the impact of present fluency in judgments about the future.
    Palma TA; Santos AS; Garcia-Marques L
    Memory; 2018 Feb; 26(2):144-153. PubMed ID: 28594272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Grouping information for judgments.
    Shah AK; Oppenheimer DM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Feb; 140(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 21299316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Isolating the contribution of perceptual fluency to judgments of learning (JOLs): Evidence for reactivity in measuring the influence of fluency.
    Fiacconi CM; Mitton EE; Laursen SJ; Skinner J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 May; 46(5):926-944. PubMed ID: 31556640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A transposed-word effect in same-different judgments to sequences of words.
    Pegado F; Grainger J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(7):1364-1371. PubMed ID: 31724421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.