BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32853264)

  • 1. Shiny-SoSV: A web-based performance calculator for somatic structural variant detection.
    Gong T; Hayes VM; Chan EKF
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0238108. PubMed ID: 32853264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SNooPer: a machine learning-based method for somatic variant identification from low-pass next-generation sequencing.
    Spinella JF; Mehanna P; Vidal R; Saillour V; Cassart P; Richer C; Ouimet M; Healy J; Sinnett D
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Nov; 17(1):912. PubMed ID: 27842494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combining accurate tumor genome simulation with crowdsourcing to benchmark somatic structural variant detection.
    Lee AY; Ewing AD; Ellrott K; Hu Y; Houlahan KE; Bare JC; Espiritu SMG; Huang V; Dang K; Chong Z; Caloian C; Yamaguchi TN; ; Kellen MR; Chen K; Norman TC; Friend SH; Guinney J; Stolovitzky G; Haussler D; Margolin AA; Stuart JM; Boutros PC
    Genome Biol; 2018 Nov; 19(1):188. PubMed ID: 30400818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shiny-Seq: advanced guided transcriptome analysis.
    Sundararajan Z; Knoll R; Hombach P; Becker M; Schultze JL; Ulas T
    BMC Res Notes; 2019 Jul; 12(1):432. PubMed ID: 31319888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SomatoSim: precision simulation of somatic single nucleotide variants.
    Hawari MA; Hong CS; Biesecker LG
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Mar; 22(1):109. PubMed ID: 33676403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ToTem: a tool for variant calling pipeline optimization.
    Tom N; Tom O; Malcikova J; Pavlova S; Kubesova B; Rausch T; Kolarik M; Benes V; Bystry V; Pospisilova S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Jun; 19(1):243. PubMed ID: 29940847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of an Interactive Web Application "Shiny App for Frequency Analysis on Homo sapiens Genome (SAFA-HsG)".
    Sivaprakasam B; Sadagopan P
    Interdiscip Sci; 2019 Dec; 11(4):723-729. PubMed ID: 31264054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. unCOVERApp: an interactive graphical application for clinical assessment of sequence coverage at the base-pair level.
    Iovino E; Seri M; Pippucci T
    Bioinformatics; 2021 May; 37(5):723-725. PubMed ID: 32805025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SNVerGUI: a desktop tool for variant analysis of next-generation sequencing data.
    Wang W; Hu W; Hou F; Hu P; Wei Z
    J Med Genet; 2012 Dec; 49(12):753-5. PubMed ID: 23024288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of Nine Somatic Variant Callers for Detection of Somatic Mutations in Exome and Targeted Deep Sequencing Data.
    Krøigård AB; Thomassen M; Lænkholm AV; Kruse TA; Larsen MJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151664. PubMed ID: 27002637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A robust pipeline with high replication rate for detection of somatic variants in the adaptive immune system as a source of common genetic variation in autoimmune disease.
    Van Horebeek L; Hilven K; Mallants K; Van Nieuwenhuijze A; Kelkka T; Savola P; Mustjoki S; Schlenner SM; Liston A; Dubois B; Goris A
    Hum Mol Genet; 2019 Apr; 28(8):1369-1380. PubMed ID: 30541027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of copy number variation detection tools for cancer using whole exome sequencing data.
    Zare F; Dow M; Monteleone N; Hosny A; Nabavi S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 May; 18(1):286. PubMed ID: 28569140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of an interactive web-based tool to conduct and interrogate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: MetaDTA.
    Freeman SC; Kerby CR; Patel A; Cooper NJ; Quinn T; Sutton AJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):81. PubMed ID: 30999861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The START App: a web-based RNAseq analysis and visualization resource.
    Nelson JW; Sklenar J; Barnes AP; Minnier J
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Feb; 33(3):447-449. PubMed ID: 28171615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variant Interpretation for Cancer (VIC): a computational tool for assessing clinical impacts of somatic variants.
    He MM; Li Q; Yan M; Cao H; Hu Y; He KY; Cao K; Li MM; Wang K
    Genome Med; 2019 Aug; 11(1):53. PubMed ID: 31443733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of technical replication for detection of low-level somatic mutations in next-generation sequencing.
    Kim J; Kim D; Lim JS; Maeng JH; Son H; Kang HC; Nam H; Lee JH; Kim S
    Nat Commun; 2019 Mar; 10(1):1047. PubMed ID: 30837471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of somatic variant detection algorithms using Ion Torrent targeted deep sequencing data.
    Wang Q; Kotoula V; Hsu PC; Papadopoulou K; Ho JWK; Fountzilas G; Giannoulatou E
    BMC Med Genomics; 2019 Dec; 12(Suppl 9):181. PubMed ID: 31874647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fast and scalable inference of multi-sample cancer lineages.
    Popic V; Salari R; Hajirasouliha I; Kashef-Haghighi D; West RB; Batzoglou S
    Genome Biol; 2015 May; 16(1):91. PubMed ID: 25944252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. NGS for Sequence Variants.
    Teng S
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 939():1-20. PubMed ID: 27807741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Annotation of Variant Data from High-Throughput DNA Sequencing from Tumor Specimens: Filtering Strategies to Identify Driver Mutations.
    Sun S; Thorson JA; Murray SS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1908():49-60. PubMed ID: 30649720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.