These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32853459)

  • 21. Subjective assessment and IOTA ADNEX model in evaluation of adnexal masses in patients with history of breast cancer.
    Pozzati F; Sassu CM; Marini G; Mascilini F; Biscione A; Giannarelli D; Garganese G; Fragomeni SM; Scambia G; Testa AC; Moro F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Oct; 62(4):594-602. PubMed ID: 37204769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predicting the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses based on the Simple Rules from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group.
    Timmerman D; Van Calster B; Testa A; Savelli L; Fischerova D; Froyman W; Wynants L; Van Holsbeke C; Epstein E; Franchi D; Kaijser J; Czekierdowski A; Guerriero S; Fruscio R; Leone FPG; Rossi A; Landolfo C; Vergote I; Bourne T; Valentin L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):424-437. PubMed ID: 26800772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ovarian cancer prediction in adnexal masses using ultrasound-based logistic regression models: a temporal and external validation study by the IOTA group.
    Timmerman D; Van Calster B; Testa AC; Guerriero S; Fischerova D; Lissoni AA; Van Holsbeke C; Fruscio R; Czekierdowski A; Jurkovic D; Savelli L; Vergote I; Bourne T; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug; 36(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 20455203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Interobserver agreement in describing adnexal masses using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules in a real-time setting and using three-dimensional ultrasound volumes and digital clips.
    Ruiz de Gauna B; Sanchez P; Pineda L; Utrilla-Layna J; Juez L; Alcázar JL
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 44(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 24265132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses by specialist ultrasound examination versus serum CA-125.
    Van Calster B; Timmerman D; Bourne T; Testa AC; Van Holsbeke C; Domali E; Jurkovic D; Neven P; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Nov; 99(22):1706-14. PubMed ID: 18000221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Intra- and interobserver agreement when describing adnexal masses using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terms and definitions: a study on three-dimensional ultrasound volumes.
    Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 41(3):318-27. PubMed ID: 22915506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Performance of the IOTA ADNEX model in preoperative discrimination of adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center.
    Araujo KG; Jales RM; Pereira PN; Yoshida A; de Angelo Andrade L; Sarian LO; Derchain S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):778-783. PubMed ID: 27194129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prospective evaluation of IOTA logistic regression models LR1 and LR2 in comparison with subjective pattern recognition for diagnosis of ovarian cancer in an outpatient setting.
    Nunes N; Ambler G; Foo X; Widschwendter M; Jurkovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 51(6):829-835. PubMed ID: 28976616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Does sphere volume affect the performance of three-dimensional power Doppler virtual vascular sampling for predicting malignancy in vascularized solid or cystic-solid adnexal masses?
    Kudla MJ; Alcázar JL
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 May; 35(5):602-8. PubMed ID: 20183808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ultrasound examination, MRI, or ROMA for discriminating between inconclusive adnexal masses as determined by IOTA Simple Rules: a prospective study.
    Chacon E; Arraiza M; Manzour N; Benito A; Mínguez JÁ; Vázquez-Vicente D; Castellanos T; Chiva L; Alcazar JL
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2023 Jun; 33(6):951-956. PubMed ID: 37055169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Three-dimensional volume off-line analysis as compared to real-time ultrasound for assessing adnexal masses.
    Alcázar JL; Iturra A; Sedda F; Aubá M; Ajossa S; Guerriero S; Jurado M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Mar; 161(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 22197306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [The use of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional color and power-Doppler in the diagnosis of blood flow indices of adnexal tumors].
    Czekierdowski A; Stachowicz N; Smoleń A; Kotarski J
    Ginekol Pol; 2006 Apr; 77(4):296-306. PubMed ID: 16875035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Performance of IOTA ADNEX model in evaluating adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center in China.
    Chen H; Qian L; Jiang M; Du Q; Yuan F; Feng W
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 54(6):815-822. PubMed ID: 31152572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
    Timmerman D; Testa AC; Bourne T; Ameye L; Jurkovic D; Van Holsbeke C; Paladini D; Van Calster B; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 31(6):681-90. PubMed ID: 18504770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prospective external validation of IOTA methods for classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of two-step strategy using benign descriptors and ADNEX: a Portuguese multicenter study.
    Borges AL; Brito M; Ambrósio P; Condeço R; Pinto P; Ambrósio B; Mahomed F; Gama JMR; Bernardo MJ; Gouveia AI; Djokovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38477149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Ultrasound-based logistic regression model LR2 versus magnetic resonance imaging for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses: a prospective study.
    Shimada K; Matsumoto K; Mimura T; Ishikawa T; Munechika J; Ohgiya Y; Kushima M; Hirose Y; Asami Y; Iitsuka C; Miyamoto S; Onuki M; Tsunoda H; Matsuoka R; Ichizuka K; Sekizawa A
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2018 Jun; 23(3):514-521. PubMed ID: 29236181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound examination for assigning a specific diagnosis to adnexal masses.
    Sokalska A; Timmerman D; Testa AC; Van Holsbeke C; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Jurkovic D; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 34(4):462-70. PubMed ID: 19685552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Power Doppler vascularity index for predicting malignancy of adnexal masses.
    Marret H; Sauget S; Giraudeau B; Body G; Tranquart F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 25(5):508-13. PubMed ID: 15846763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Performance of IOTA Simple Rules, Simple Rules risk assessment, ADNEX model and O-RADS in differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions in North American women.
    Hiett AK; Sonek JD; Guy M; Reid TJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 May; 59(5):668-676. PubMed ID: 34533862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Complex pelvic mass as a target of evaluation of vessel distribution by color Doppler sonography for the diagnosis of adnexal malignancies: results of a multicenter European study.
    Guerriero S; Alcazar JL; Coccia ME; Ajossa S; Scarselli G; Boi M; Gerada M; Melis GB
    J Ultrasound Med; 2002 Oct; 21(10):1105-11. PubMed ID: 12369665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.