These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32854074)

  • 1. Biomechanical comparison of titanium miniplates versus a variety of CAD/CAM plates in mandibular reconstruction.
    Steffen C; Sellenschloh K; Vollmer M; Morlock MM; Heiland M; Huber G; Rendenbach C
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Nov; 111():104007. PubMed ID: 32854074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical comparison of polylactide-based versus titanium miniplates in mandible reconstruction in vitro.
    Steffen C; Sellenschloh K; Polster V; Heyland M; Vollmer M; Morlock MM; Heiland M; Huber G; Rendenbach C
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Sep; 121(4):377-382. PubMed ID: 31863927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient-specific miniplates versus patient-specific reconstruction plate: A biomechanical comparison with 3D-printed plates in mandibular reconstruction.
    Steffen C; Sellenschloh K; Willsch M; Soares AP; Morlock MM; Heiland M; Kreutzer K; Huber G; Rendenbach C
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Apr; 140():105742. PubMed ID: 36857975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient specific glass fiber reinforced composite versus titanium plate: A comparative biomechanical analysis under cyclic dynamic loading.
    Rendenbach C; Steffen C; Sellenschloh K; Heyland M; Morlock MM; Toivonen J; Moritz N; Smeets R; Heiland M; Vallittu PK; Huber G
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Mar; 91():212-219. PubMed ID: 30594831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CAD-CAM plates versus conventional fixation plates for primary mandibular reconstruction: A biomechanical in vitro analysis.
    Rendenbach C; Sellenschloh K; Gerbig L; Morlock MM; Beck-Broichsitter B; Smeets R; Heiland M; Huber G; Hanken H
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Nov; 45(11):1878-1883. PubMed ID: 28943180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical evaluation of CAD/CAM magnesium miniplates as a fixation strategy for the treatment of segmental mandibular reconstruction with a fibula free flap.
    Ruf P; Orassi V; Fischer H; Steffen C; Kreutzer K; Duda GN; Heiland M; Checa S; Rendenbach C
    Comput Biol Med; 2024 Jan; 168():107817. PubMed ID: 38064852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. PEEK versus titanium locking plates for proximal humerus fracture fixation: a comparative biomechanical study in two- and three-part fractures.
    Schliemann B; Seifert R; Theisen C; Gehweiler D; Wähnert D; Schulze M; Raschke MJ; Weimann A
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 Jan; 137(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 28005168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical Comparison of 2 Veterinary Locking Plates to Monocortical Screw/Polymethylmethacrylate Fixation in Canine Cadaveric Cervical Vertebral Column.
    Hettlich BF; Fosgate GT; Litsky AS
    Vet Surg; 2017 Jan; 46(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 27902850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental biomechanical study of the primary stability of different osteosynthesis systems for mandibular reconstruction with an iliac crest graft.
    Grohmann I; Raith S; Kesting M; Rau A; Mücke T; Lethaus B; Hölzle F; Steiner T
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 51(8):942-7. PubMed ID: 23958348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical comparison between stainless steel, titanium and carbon-fiber reinforced polyetheretherketone volar locking plates for distal radius fractures.
    Mugnai R; Tarallo L; Capra F; Catani F
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Oct; 104(6):877-882. PubMed ID: 29807189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative evaluation of a patient-specific customised plate designs and screws for partial mandibular reconstruction.
    Dutta A; Mukherjee K; Seesala VS; Dutta K; Paul RR; Dhara S; Gupta S
    Med Eng Phys; 2023 Jan; 111():103941. PubMed ID: 36792242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of plate material and screw design on stiffness and ultimate load of locked plating in osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures.
    Katthagen JC; Schwarze M; Warnhoff M; Voigt C; Hurschler C; Lill H
    Injury; 2016 Mar; 47(3):617-24. PubMed ID: 26804939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Locking screw-plate interface stability in carbon-fibre reinforced polyetheretherketone proximal humerus plates.
    Hak DJ; Fader R; Baldini T; Chadayammuri VBS
    Int Orthop; 2017 Sep; 41(9):1735-1739. PubMed ID: 28707049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving mandibular reconstruction by using topology optimization, patient specific design and additive manufacturing?-A biomechanical comparison against miniplates on human specimen.
    Lang JJ; Bastian M; Foehr P; Seebach M; Weitz J; von Deimling C; Schwaiger BJ; Micheler CM; Wilhelm NJ; Grosse CU; Kesting M; Burgkart R
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0253002. PubMed ID: 34101755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An in vitro study of the effect of bony buttressing on fixation strength of a fractured atrophic edentulous mandible model.
    Sikes JW; Smith BR; Mukherjee DP
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Jan; 58(1):56-61; discussion 62. PubMed ID: 10632166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical feasibility of non-locking system in patient-specific mandibular reconstruction using fibular free flaps.
    Zhong S; Shi Q; Van Dessel J; Gu Y; Lübbers HT; Yang S; Sun Y; Politis C
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Dec; 148():106197. PubMed ID: 37875041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical evaluation of a new MatrixMandible plating system on cadaver mandibles.
    Gateno J; Cookston C; Hsu SS; Stal DN; Durrani SK; Gold J; Ismaily S; Alexander JW; Noble PC; Xia JJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1900-14. PubMed ID: 24012175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feasibility of carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer fixation plates for treatment of atrophic mandibular fracture: A finite element method.
    Nurettin D; Burak B
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2182-2189. PubMed ID: 30340836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical comparison of locking and non-locking patient-specific mandibular reconstruction plate using finite element analysis.
    Zhong S; Shi Q; Sun Y; Yang S; Van Dessel J; Gu Y; Chen X; Lübbers HT; Politis C
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Dec; 124():104849. PubMed ID: 34563812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture line stability as a function of the internal fixation system: an in vitro comparison using a mandibular angle fracture model.
    Shetty V; McBrearty D; Fourney M; Caputo AA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1995 Jul; 53(7):791-801; discussion 801-2. PubMed ID: 7595794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.