These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Biomechanical Comparison of Volar Fixed-Angle Locking Plates for AO C3 Distal Radius Fractures: Titanium Versus Stainless Steel With Compression. Marshall T; Momaya A; Eberhardt A; Chaudhari N; Hunt TR J Hand Surg Am; 2015 Oct; 40(10):2032-8. PubMed ID: 26253601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Biomechanical analysis of titanium fixation plates and screws in mandibular angle fractures. Atik F; Atac MS; Özkan A; Kilinc Y; Arslan M Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(3):386-90. PubMed ID: 27022805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. In Silico Analysis of the Biomechanical Stability of Commercially Pure Ti and Ti-15Mo Plates for the Treatment of Mandibular Angle Fracture. Yamaguchi S; Anchieta RB; Guastaldi FPS; Tovar N; Tawara D; Imazato S; Coelho PG J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 May; 75(5):1004.e1-1004.e9. PubMed ID: 28137635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison between locking and non-locking plates for fixation of metacarpal fractures in an animal model. Ochman S; Doht S; Paletta J; Langer M; Raschke MJ; Meffert RH J Hand Surg Am; 2010 Apr; 35(4):597-603. PubMed ID: 20299161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biomechanical study in polyurethane mandibles of different metal plates and internal fixation techniques, employed in mandibular angle fractures. Semeghini Guastaldi FP; Hochuli-Vieira E; Guastaldi AC J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 25(6):2246-50. PubMed ID: 25340696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Implant Material, Type of Fixation at the Shaft, and Position of Plate Modify Biomechanics of Distal Femur Plate Osteosynthesis. Kandemir U; Augat P; Konowalczyk S; Wipf F; von Oldenburg G; Schmidt U J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Aug; 31(8):e241-e246. PubMed ID: 28394844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Towards mechanobiologically optimized mandible reconstruction: CAD/CAM miniplates vs. reconstruction plates for fibula free flap fixation: A finite element study. Ruf P; Orassi V; Fischer H; Steffen C; Duda GN; Heiland M; Kreutzer K; Checa S; Rendenbach C Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2022; 10():1005022. PubMed ID: 36466355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of miniplates and biodegradable plates in reconstruction of the mandible with a fibular free flap. Kim NK; Nam W; Kim HJ Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 53(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 25616846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The biomechanical aspects of reconstruction for segmental defects of the mandible: a finite element study to assess the optimisation of plate and screw factors. Bujtár P; Simonovics J; Váradi K; Sándor GK; Avery CM J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):855-62. PubMed ID: 24467871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparative evaluation of parasymphyseal fracture fixation in edentulous patients performed using dynamic navigation systems and Herbert screws with the conventional two-plate method: A study on models. Demetoglu U; Bilge S J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Sep; 122(4):e39-e44. PubMed ID: 33493686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of Mechanical Stabilization of the Mandibular Angulus Fracture Fixation, With Titanium Plates and Screws, Resorbable Plates and Screws, and Bone Adhesives. Cural Ü; Atalay B; Yildirim MS J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 29(7):1780-1787. PubMed ID: 30113419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Miniplates for Free Flap Fixation at the Mandible: A Feasibility Study. Kreutzer K; Steffen C; Koerdt S; Doll C; Ebker T; Nahles S; Flügge T; Heiland M; Beck-Broichsitter B; Rendenbach C Front Surg; 2022; 9():778371. PubMed ID: 35372463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]