219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32854161)
21. Using instrumental variables to estimate a Cox's proportional hazards regression subject to additive confounding.
MacKenzie TA; Tosteson TD; Morden NE; Stukel TA; O'Malley AJ
Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol; 2014 Jun; 14(1-2):54-68. PubMed ID: 25506259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Confounder selection strategies targeting stable treatment effect estimators.
Loh WW; Vansteelandt S
Stat Med; 2021 Feb; 40(3):607-630. PubMed ID: 33150645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dose-response modeling in mental health using stein-like estimators with instrumental variables.
Ginestet CE; Emsley R; Landau S
Stat Med; 2017 May; 36(11):1696-1714. PubMed ID: 28222485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Instrumental variables: application and limitations.
Martens EP; Pestman WR; de Boer A; Belitser SV; Klungel OH
Epidemiology; 2006 May; 17(3):260-7. PubMed ID: 16617274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Confounding and regression adjustment in difference-in-differences studies.
Zeldow B; Hatfield LA
Health Serv Res; 2021 Oct; 56(5):932-941. PubMed ID: 33978956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. On two-stage estimation of structural instrumental variable models.
Choi BY; Fine JP; Brookhart MA
Biometrika; 2017 Dec; 104(4):881-899. PubMed ID: 29430042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Adjusting for bias and unmeasured confounding in Mendelian randomization studies with binary responses.
Palmer TM; Thompson JR; Tobin MD; Sheehan NA; Burton PR
Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 37(5):1161-8. PubMed ID: 18463132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A general approach to evaluating the bias of 2-stage instrumental variable estimators.
Wan F; Small D; Mitra N
Stat Med; 2018 May; 37(12):1997-2015. PubMed ID: 29572890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A causal proportional hazards estimator under homogeneous or heterogeneous selection in an IV setting.
Sørensen DN; Martinussen T; Tchetgen Tchetgen E
Lifetime Data Anal; 2019 Oct; 25(4):639-659. PubMed ID: 31065968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Selection Bias When Estimating Average Treatment Effects Using One-sample Instrumental Variable Analysis.
Hughes RA; Davies NM; Davey Smith G; Tilling K
Epidemiology; 2019 May; 30(3):350-357. PubMed ID: 30896457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Combating unmeasured confounding in cross-sectional studies: evaluating instrumental-variable and Heckman selection models.
DeMaris A
Psychol Methods; 2014 Sep; 19(3):380-97. PubMed ID: 25110904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Time dependent hazard ratio estimation using instrumental variables without conditioning on an omitted covariate.
MacKenzie TA; Martinez-Camblor P; O'Malley AJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Mar; 21(1):56. PubMed ID: 33743583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A comparison of methods to estimate the survivor average causal effect in the presence of missing data: a simulation study.
McGuinness MB; Kasza J; Karahalios A; Guymer RH; Finger RP; Simpson JA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):223. PubMed ID: 31795945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparison of methods to handle skew distributed cost variables in the analysis of the resource consumption in schizophrenia treatment.
Kilian R; Matschinger H; Löeffler W; Roick C; Angermeyer MC
J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2002 Mar; 5(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12529567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Instrumental variable with competing risk model.
Zheng C; Dai R; Hari PN; Zhang MJ
Stat Med; 2017 Apr; 36(8):1240-1255. PubMed ID: 28064466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A comparison of confounder selection and adjustment methods for estimating causal effects using large healthcare databases.
Benasseur I; Talbot D; Durand M; Holbrook A; Matteau A; Potter BJ; Renoux C; Schnitzer ME; Tarride JÉ; Guertin JR
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2022 Apr; 31(4):424-433. PubMed ID: 34953160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Bias Due to Confounders for the Exposure-Competing Risk Relationship.
Lesko CR; Lau B
Epidemiology; 2017 Jan; 28(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 27748680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Valid instrumental variable selection method using negative control outcomes and constructing efficient estimator.
Orihara S; Goto A; Taguri M
Biom J; 2024 Jun; 66(4):e2300113. PubMed ID: 38801216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Bespoke Instruments: A new tool for addressing unmeasured confounders.
Richardson DB; Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ
Am J Epidemiol; 2022 Mar; 191(5):939-947. PubMed ID: 34907434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Adjustment for unmeasured confounding through informative priors for the confounder-outcome relation.
Groenwold RHH; Shofty I; Miočević M; van Smeden M; Klugkist I
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):174. PubMed ID: 30577773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
