84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32854440)
1. The Climate and Nutritional Impact of Beef in Different Dietary Patterns in Denmark.
Mogensen L; Hermansen JE; Trolle E
Foods; 2020 Aug; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 32854440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Climate change mitigation through dietary change: a systematic review of empirical and modelling studies on the environmental footprints and health effects of 'sustainable diets'.
Jarmul S; Dangour AD; Green R; Liew Z; Haines A; Scheelbeek PF
Environ Res Lett; 2020 Dec; 15():123014. PubMed ID: 33897807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dietary recommendations in Spain -affordability and environmental sustainability?
González-García S; Green RF; Scheelbeek PF; Harris F; Dangour AD
J Clean Prod; 2020 May; 254():120125. PubMed ID: 33897918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A recipe for change: Analyzing the climate and ecosystem impacts of the Brazilian diet shift.
Bakman T; Hoffmann BS; Portugal-Pereira J
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Jun; 930():172568. PubMed ID: 38649048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Integrating health, nutrition, and environmental impacts of foods: a life cycle impact assessment and modelling analysis of foods in Canada.
Jarvis S; Hadjikakou M; Wu J; Classens M; Chiavaroli L; Sievenpiper J; L'Abbe M; Jenkins D; Malik V
Lancet Planet Health; 2024 Apr; 8 Suppl 1():S18. PubMed ID: 38632913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness of current protein recommendations in adolescent athletes on a low-carbon diet.
Franca PAP; Gonçalves Lima CKAZ; de Oliveira TM; Ferreira TJ; da Silva RRM; Loureiro LL; Pierucci APTR
Front Nutr; 2022; 9():1016409. PubMed ID: 36185661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Five U.S. Dietary Patterns and Their Relationship to Land Use, Water Use, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Implications for Future Food Security.
Jennings R; Henderson AD; Phelps A; Janda KM; van den Berg AE
Nutrients; 2023 Jan; 15(1):. PubMed ID: 36615871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Greenhouse gas emissions and energy use associated with production of individual self-selected US diets.
Heller MC; Willits-Smith A; Meyer R; Keoleian GA; Rose D
Environ Res Lett; 2018 Apr; 13(4):044004. PubMed ID: 29853988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exploring tradeoffs among diet quality and environmental impacts in self-selected diets: a population-based study.
Mazac R; Hyyrynen M; Kaartinen NE; Männistö S; Irz X; Hyytiäinen K; Tuomisto HL; Lombardini C
Eur J Nutr; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38584247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multi-Objective Optimization of Nutritional, Environmental and Economic Aspects of Diets Applied to the Spanish Context.
Abejón R; Batlle-Bayer L; Laso J; Bala A; Vazquez-Rowe I; Larrea-Gallegos G; Margallo M; Cristobal J; Puig R; Fullana-I-Palmer P; Aldaco R
Foods; 2020 Nov; 9(11):. PubMed ID: 33207725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving Human Diets and Welfare through Using Herbivore-Based Foods: 2. Environmental Consequences and Mitigations.
Caradus JR; Chapman DF; Rowarth JS
Animals (Basel); 2024 Apr; 14(9):. PubMed ID: 38731357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Meat substitutes: Resource demands and environmental footprints.
Smetana S; Ristic D; Pleissner D; Tuomisto HL; Parniakov O; Heinz V
Resour Conserv Recycl; 2023 Mar; 190():106831. PubMed ID: 36874227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simple dietary substitutions can reduce carbon footprints and improve dietary quality across diverse segments of the US population.
Grummon AH; Lee CJY; Robinson TN; Rimm EB; Rose D
Nat Food; 2023 Nov; 4(11):966-977. PubMed ID: 37884673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mitigation of the U.S. agrifood sector's contribution to human and planetary health: a case study.
Dietz WH; Fanzo J
Front Nutr; 2023; 10():1297214. PubMed ID: 38035359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Environmental impact of Norwegian self-selected diets: comparing current intake with national dietary guidelines and EAT-Lancet targets.
Lengle JM; Michaelsen Bjøntegaard M; Hauger Carlsen M; Jafarzadeh S; Frost Andersen L
Public Health Nutr; 2024 Mar; 27(1):e100. PubMed ID: 38523532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Food purchase behaviour in a Finnish population: patterns, carbon footprints and expenditures.
Meinilä J; Hartikainen H; Tuomisto HL; Uusitalo L; Vepsäläinen H; Saarinen M; Kinnunen S; Lehto E; Saarijärvi H; Katajajuuri JM; Erkkola M; Nevalainen J; Fogelholm M
Public Health Nutr; 2022 Nov; 25(11):3265-3277. PubMed ID: 35979803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Carbon Footprint Reduction by Transitioning to a Diet Consistent with the Danish Climate-Friendly Dietary Guidelines: A Comparison of Different Carbon Footprint Databases.
Trolle E; Nordman M; Lassen AD; Colley TA; Mogensen L
Foods; 2022 Apr; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 35454705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dietary Patterns at the Individual Level through a Nutritional and Environmental Approach: The Case Study of a School Canteen.
Peano C; Girgenti V; Sciascia S; Barone E; Sottile F
Foods; 2022 Mar; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 35407095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Changing Food Consumption and Nutrition Intake in Kazakhstan.
Jia M; Zhen L; Xiao Y
Nutrients; 2022 Jan; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 35057506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Environmental Impact of Meals: How Big Is the Carbon Footprint in the School Canteens?
Volanti M; Arfelli F; Neri E; Saliani A; Passarini F; Vassura I; Cristallo G
Foods; 2022 Jan; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 35053926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
