These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32854605)

  • 21. Enhanced expectancies benefit performance under distraction, but compromise it under stress: Exploring the OPTIMAL theory.
    Simmonds PJ; Wakefield CJ; Coyles G; Roberts JW
    Hum Mov Sci; 2023 Jun; 89():103085. PubMed ID: 37030071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The recommendation for learners to be provided with control over their feedback schedule is questioned in a self-controlled learning paradigm.
    Yantha ZD; McKay B; Ste-Marie DM
    J Sports Sci; 2022 Apr; 40(7):769-782. PubMed ID: 34963413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Learning from the experts: gaining insights into best practice during the acquisition of three novel motor skills.
    Hedges NJ; Edwards C; Luttin S; Bowcock A
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2011 Jun; 82(2):178-87. PubMed ID: 21699097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Autonomy facilitates repeated maximum force productions.
    Iwatsuki T; Abdollahipour R; Psotta R; Lewthwaite R; Wulf G
    Hum Mov Sci; 2017 Oct; 55():264-268. PubMed ID: 28865313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Why self-controlled feedback enhances motor learning: Answers from electroencephalography and indices of motivation.
    Grand KF; Bruzi AT; Dyke FB; Godwin MM; Leiker AM; Thompson AG; Buchanan TL; Miller MW
    Hum Mov Sci; 2015 Oct; 43():23-32. PubMed ID: 26163375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Autonomy support and preference-performance dissociation in choice-reaction time tasks.
    Ziv G; Lidor R
    Hum Mov Sci; 2021 Jun; 77():102786. PubMed ID: 33765619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Expectation of Teaching and Self-Controlled KR in Motor Skills Acquisition: Are There Additive Effects?
    Batista MTS; Figueiredo LS; Martins CA; Nogueira NGHM; Ferreira BP; Benda RN
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2023 Jun; 94(2):391-400. PubMed ID: 35358020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning.
    Wulf G; Lewthwaite R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1382-1414. PubMed ID: 26833314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A test of optimal theory on young adolescents' standing long jump performance and motivation.
    Simpson T; Cronin L; Ellison P; Carnegie E; Marchant D
    Hum Mov Sci; 2020 Aug; 72():102651. PubMed ID: 32721370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Self-controlled amount and pacing of practice facilitate learning of a sequential timing task.
    Aiken CA; Post PG; Hout MC; Fairbrother JT
    J Sports Sci; 2020 Feb; 38(4):405-415. PubMed ID: 31856697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Manipulating target size influences perceptions of success when learning a dart-throwing skill but does not impact retention.
    Ong NT; Lohse KR; Hodges NJ
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1378. PubMed ID: 26441753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. OPTIMAL theory's claims about motivation lack evidence in the motor learning literature.
    Parma JO; Miller MW; Bacelar MFB
    Psychol Sport Exerc; 2024 Sep; 74():102690. PubMed ID: 38908415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of self-controlled practice and focus of attention on free throw accuracy: Exploring optimal theory among skilled basketball players.
    Shooli M; Saemi E; Boushehri NS; Seifourian M; Simpson T
    Hum Mov Sci; 2024 Apr; 94():103187. PubMed ID: 38330629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Examining the impact of error estimation on the effects of self-controlled feedback.
    Barros JAC; Yantha ZD; Carter MJ; Hussien J; Ste-Marie DM
    Hum Mov Sci; 2019 Feb; 63():182-198. PubMed ID: 30580207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Using error-estimation to probe the psychological processes underlying contextual interference effects.
    Thomas JL; Fawver B; Taylor S; Miller MW; Williams AM; Lohse KR
    Hum Mov Sci; 2021 Oct; 79():102854. PubMed ID: 34375844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Brain lateralisation and motor learning: selective effects of dominant and non-dominant hand practice on the early acquisition of throwing skills.
    Stöckel T; Weigelt M
    Laterality; 2012; 17(1):18-37. PubMed ID: 21500083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. That looks easy! Evidence against the benefits of an easier criterion of success for enhancing motor learning.
    Parma JO; Bacelar MFB; Cabral DAR; Lohse KR; Hodges NJ; Miller MW
    Psychol Sport Exerc; 2023 May; 66():102394. PubMed ID: 37665856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Additive benefits of external focus and enhanced performance expectancy for motor learning.
    Pascua LA; Wulf G; Lewthwaite R
    J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 24875153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Self-controlled learning benefits: exploring contributions of self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation via path analysis.
    Ste-Marie DM; Carter MJ; Law B; Vertes K; Smith V
    J Sports Sci; 2016 Sep; 34(17):1650-6. PubMed ID: 26707002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The autonomy and focus of attention strategies under distraction: Frequency and sample entropy analyses in a dynamic balance task.
    Yamada M; Raisbeck LD
    Hum Mov Sci; 2021 Dec; 80():102882. PubMed ID: 34564056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.