These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32855881)

  • 21. Driving with hemianopia VIII: Effects of a vibro-tactile assistance system on safety and gaze behavior in pedestrian crossing situations.
    Hölzl R; Steckhan L; Lehsing C; Savage SW; Bowers AR
    Safety (Basel); 2021 Mar; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 34765674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Management of strabismus with hemianopic visual field defects.
    van Waveren M; Jägle H; Besch D
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 251(2):575-84. PubMed ID: 22588288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Impact of dual tasking on gaze behaviour and locomotor strategies adopted while circumventing virtual pedestrians during a collision avoidance task.
    Bhojwani TM; Lynch SD; Bühler MA; Lamontagne A
    Exp Brain Res; 2022 Oct; 240(10):2633-2645. PubMed ID: 35980438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development of Virtual Reality Walking Collision Detection Test on Head-mounted display.
    Hwang AD; Peli E; Jung JH
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2023; 12449():. PubMed ID: 36970501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Driving with hemianopia, I: Detection performance in a driving simulator.
    Bowers AR; Mandel AJ; Goldstein RB; Peli E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Nov; 50(11):5137-47. PubMed ID: 19608541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Field expansion for homonymous hemianopia by optically induced peripheral exotropia.
    Peli E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2000 Sep; 77(9):453-64. PubMed ID: 11014672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Use of Virtual Reality Simulation to Identify Vision-Related Disability in Patients With Glaucoma.
    Lam AKN; To E; Weinreb RN; Yu M; Mak H; Lai G; Chiu V; Wu K; Zhang X; Cheng TPH; Guo PY; Leung CKS
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2020 May; 138(5):490-498. PubMed ID: 32191274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Driving With Hemianopia X: Effects of Cross Traffic on Gaze Behaviors and Pedestrian Responses at Intersections.
    Xu J; Baliutaviciute V; Swan G; Bowers AR
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():938140. PubMed ID: 35898933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Gaze-grasp coordination in obstacle avoidance: differences between binocular and monocular viewing.
    Grant S
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Dec; 233(12):3489-505. PubMed ID: 26298046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Torsional anomalous retinal correspondence effectively expands the visual field in hemianopia.
    Satgunam P; Peli E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Sep; 89(9):E1353-63. PubMed ID: 22885782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Is it possible to compensate for visual field defects?].
    Lachenmayr B
    Ophthalmologe; 2006 May; 103(5):382-6. PubMed ID: 16283190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Randomized crossover clinical trial of real and sham peripheral prism glasses for hemianopia.
    Bowers AR; Keeney K; Peli E
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Feb; 132(2):214-22. PubMed ID: 24201760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Driving with Hemianopia V: Do Individuals with Hemianopia Spontaneously Adapt Their Gaze Scanning to Differing Hazard Detection Demands?
    Alberti CF; Goldstein RB; Peli E; Bowers AR
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2017 Sep; 6(5):11. PubMed ID: 29067219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Phone messages affect the detection of approaching pedestrians in healthy young and older adults immersed in a virtual community environment.
    Souza Silva W; McFadyen B; Kehayia E; Azevedo N; Fung J; Lamontagne A
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0217062. PubMed ID: 31141549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Visual attention measures predict pedestrian detection in central field loss: a pilot study.
    Alberti CF; Horowitz T; Bronstad PM; Bowers AR
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e89381. PubMed ID: 24558495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of binocular summation in the peripheral visual field in young and older patients.
    Pardhan S
    Curr Eye Res; 1997 Mar; 16(3):252-5. PubMed ID: 9088742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Interocular conflict from a monocular augmented reality display: Impact of visual characteristics on performance.
    Bayle E; Hourlier S; Lelandais S; Salasc CA; Leroy L; Plantier J; Neveu P
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0256766. PubMed ID: 34473744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Functional visual outcomes of cataract extraction in monocular versus binocular patients.
    Pomberg ML; Miller KM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 138(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 15234291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Monocular versus binocular vision in postural control.
    Isotalo E; Kapoula Z; Feret PH; Gauchon K; Zamfirescu F; Gagey PM
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2004 Mar; 31(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 15041048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hazard Detection by Drivers with Paracentral Homonymous Field Loss: A Small Case Series.
    Matthew BP; Bowers AR; Albu A; Goldstein RB; Peli E
    J Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Dec; 2011(Suppl 5):1. PubMed ID: 24501685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.