BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

843 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32856058)

  • 1. Efficiency and efficacy of vitrification in 35 654 sibling oocytes from donation cycles.
    Cornet-Bartolomé D; Rodriguez A; García D; Barragán M; Vassena R
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Oct; 35(10):2262-2271. PubMed ID: 32856058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Definition of a clinical strategy to enhance the efficacy, efficiency and safety of egg donation cycles with imported vitrified oocytes.
    Rienzi L; Cimadomo D; Maggiulli R; Vaiarelli A; Dusi L; Buffo L; Amendola MG; Colamaria S; Giuliani M; Bruno G; Stoppa M; Ubaldi FM
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 35(4):785-795. PubMed ID: 32240287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How does vitrification affect oocyte viability in oocyte donation cycles? A prospective study to compare outcomes achieved with fresh versus vitrified sibling oocytes.
    Solé M; Santaló J; Boada M; Clua E; Rodríguez I; Martínez F; Coroleu B; Barri PN; Veiga A
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2087-92. PubMed ID: 23744895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of two different oocyte vitrification methods: a prospective, paired study on the same genetic background and stimulation protocol.
    Pujol A; Zamora MJ; Obradors A; Garcia D; Rodriguez A; Vassena R
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Jun; 34(6):989-997. PubMed ID: 31116386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Should we worry about the clock? Relationship between time to ICSI and reproductive outcomes in cycles with fresh and vitrified oocytes.
    Bárcena P; Rodríguez M; Obradors A; Vernaeve V; Vassena R
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Jun; 31(6):1182-91. PubMed ID: 27076502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Elective and Onco-fertility preservation: factors related to IVF outcomes.
    Cobo A; García-Velasco J; Domingo J; Pellicer A; Remohí J
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Dec; 33(12):2222-2231. PubMed ID: 30383235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study.
    Li Z; Wang YA; Ledger W; Edgar DH; Sullivan EA
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2794-801. PubMed ID: 25316444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Open versus closed oocyte vitrification in an oocyte donation programme: a prospective randomized sibling oocyte study.
    De Munck N; Santos-Ribeiro S; Stoop D; Van de Velde H; Verheyen G
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 26724798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.
    Toftager M; Bogstad J; Løssl K; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Bryndorf T; Nilas L; Pinborg A
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 28130435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sperm cryopreservation does not affect live birth rate in normozoospermic men: analysis of 7969 oocyte donation cycles.
    Torra-Massana M; Vassena R; Rodríguez A
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Mar; 38(3):400-407. PubMed ID: 36661036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of donor sperm in addition to oocyte donation after repeated implantation failure in normozoospermic patients does not improve live birth rates.
    Blázquez A; García D; Rodríguez A; Vassena R; Vernaeve V
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2549-2553. PubMed ID: 27609983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Successful elective and medically indicated oocyte vitrification and warming for autologous in vitro fertilization, with predicted birth probabilities for fertility preservation according to number of cryopreserved oocytes and age at retrieval.
    Doyle JO; Richter KS; Lim J; Stillman RJ; Graham JR; Tucker MJ
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):459-66.e2. PubMed ID: 26604065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?
    Drakopoulos P; Blockeel C; Stoop D; Camus M; de Vos M; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):370-6. PubMed ID: 26724797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Closed oocyte vitrification and storage in an oocyte donation programme: obstetric and neonatal outcome.
    De Munck N; Belva F; Van de Velde H; Verheyen G; Stoop D
    Hum Reprod; 2016 May; 31(5):1024-33. PubMed ID: 26936884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Endometrial preparation: effect of estrogen dose and administration route on reproductive outcomes in oocyte donation cycles with fresh embryo transfer.
    Madero S; Rodriguez A; Vassena R; Vernaeve V
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1755-64. PubMed ID: 27141040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance.
    Rienzi L; Gracia C; Maggiulli R; LaBarbera AR; Kaser DJ; Ubaldi FM; Vanderpoel S; Racowsky C
    Hum Reprod Update; 2017 Mar; 23(2):139-155. PubMed ID: 27827818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effective protection: the embryonic development and clinical outcomes of emergency vitrification of 1246 oocytes and Day 0-Day 5 embryos in a natural disaster.
    Song W; Zhang F; Wang Y; Shi H; Sun N; Jin H; Wang X; Guo Y; Hu L; Zhai J; Dai S; Zhang Y; Su Y; Yao G; Shi S; Wen S; Song N; Wu Z; Chen L; Cheng T; Kang B; Sun J; Huang X; Sun Z; Cheng L; Liang Y; Sun Y
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Dec; 38(12):2412-2421. PubMed ID: 37846525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of artificial shrinkage (collapse) on the implantation potential of vitrified blastocysts.
    Van Landuyt L; Polyzos NP; De Munck N; Blockeel C; Van de Velde H; Verheyen G
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Nov; 30(11):2509-18. PubMed ID: 26364080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Associations of blastocyst features, trophectoderm biopsy and other laboratory practice with post-warming behavior and implantation.
    Cimadomo D; Capalbo A; Levi-Setti PE; Soscia D; Orlando G; Albani E; Parini V; Stoppa M; Dovere L; Tacconi L; Ievoli E; Maggiulli R; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 33(11):1992-2001. PubMed ID: 30265329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cumulative pregnancy rates of two strategies: Day 3 fresh embryo transfer followed by Day 3 or Day 5/6 vitrification and embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Mengels A; Van Muylder A; Peeraer K; Luyten J; Laenen A; Spiessens C; Debrock S
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Jan; 39(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 37886820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 43.