179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32856166)
21. Patient Characteristics Associated With Patient-Reported Deterrents to Adjunct Breast Cancer Screening of Patients With Dense Breasts.
Miller MM; Repich K; Patrie JT; Anderson RT; Harvey JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Nov; 217(5):1069-1079. PubMed ID: 33147054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography.
Stout NK; Rosenberg MA; Trentham-Dietz A; Smith MA; Robinson SM; Fryback DG
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Jun; 98(11):774-82. PubMed ID: 16757702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cost-effectiveness of annual versus biennial screening mammography for women with high mammographic breast density.
Pataky R; Ismail Z; Coldman AJ; Elwood M; Gelmon K; Hedden L; Hislop G; Kan L; McCoy B; Olivotto IA; Peacock S
J Med Screen; 2014 Dec; 21(4):180-8. PubMed ID: 25186116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging.
Plevritis SK; Kurian AW; Sigal BM; Daniel BL; Ikeda DM; Stockdale FE; Garber AM
JAMA; 2006 May; 295(20):2374-84. PubMed ID: 16720823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cost-Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs. Abbreviated Breast MRI for Screening Women with Intermediate Risk of Breast Cancer-How Low-Cost Must MRI Be?
Tollens F; Baltzer PAT; Dietzel M; Rübenthaler J; Froelich MF; Kaiser CG
Cancers (Basel); 2021 Mar; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 33808955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Breast-specific gamma imaging or ultrasonography as adjunct imaging diagnostics in women with mammographically dense breasts.
Zhang Z; Wang W; Wang X; Yu X; Zhu Y; Zhan H; Chen Z; Li B; Huang J
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6062-6071. PubMed ID: 32524221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [CONTRAST ENHANCED SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY IN WOMEN WITH INTERMEDIATE BREAST CANCER RISK AND DENSE BREAST].
Sklair-Levy M; Sorin V; Yagil Y; Shalmon A; Halshtok Neiman O; Samoocha D; Faermann Weidenfeld R
Harefuah; 2022 Feb; 161(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 35195969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Women With Intermediate Breast Cancer Risk and Dense Breasts.
Sorin V; Yagil Y; Yosepovich A; Shalmon A; Gotlieb M; Neiman OH; Sklair-Levy M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Nov; 211(5):W267-W274. PubMed ID: 30240292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A study on the cost effectiveness of sestamibi scintimammography for screening women with dense breasts for breast cancer.
Allen MW; Hendi P; Bassett L; Phelps ME; Gambhir SS
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 1999 Jun; 55(3):243-58. PubMed ID: 10517169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up.
Corsetti V; Houssami N; Ghirardi M; Ferrari A; Speziani M; Bellarosa S; Remida G; Gasparotti C; Galligioni E; Ciatto S
Eur J Cancer; 2011 May; 47(7):1021-6. PubMed ID: 21211962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Tailored breast cancer screening program with microdose mammography, US, and MR Imaging: short-term results of a pilot study in 40-49-year-old women.
Venturini E; Losio C; Panizza P; Rodighiero MG; Fedele I; Tacchini S; Schiani E; Ravelli S; Cristel G; Panzeri MM; De Cobelli F; Del Maschio A
Radiology; 2013 Aug; 268(2):347-55. PubMed ID: 23579052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sensitivity and specificity of MR mammography with histopathological correlation in 250 breasts.
Boné B; Aspelin P; Bronge L; Isberg B; Perbeck L; Veress B
Acta Radiol; 1996 Mar; 37(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 8600964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Cost-effectiveness of MR-imaging in the preoperative work-up of suspicious breast lesions].
Schmitt KP; Boehm T; Fleck M; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2001 Oct; 173(10):898-901. PubMed ID: 11588676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Preoperative MR mammography in breast carcinoma. Effect on operative treatment from the surgical viewpoint].
Gatzemeier W; Liersch T; Stylianou A; Buttler A; Becker H; Fischer U
Chirurg; 1999 Dec; 70(12):1460-8. PubMed ID: 10637703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced mammography for suspicious findings in dense breasts: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lin ST; Li HJ; Li YZ; Chen QQ; Ye JY; Lin S; Cai SQ; Sun JG
Cancer Med; 2024 Apr; 13(8):e7128. PubMed ID: 38659408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Comparison of the diagnostic efficiency in breast malignancy between cone beam breast CT and mammography in dense breast].
Liu AD; Ma Y; Yin L; Han P; Li HJ; Ye ZX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Aug; 40(8):604-609. PubMed ID: 30139031
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Performance of DWI as a Rapid Unenhanced Technique for Detecting Mammographically Occult Breast Cancer in Elevated-Risk Women With Dense Breasts.
McDonald ES; Hammersley JA; Chou SH; Rahbar H; Scheel JR; Lee CI; Liu CL; Lehman CD; Partridge SC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jul; 207(1):205-16. PubMed ID: 27077731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Is 0.6T magnetic resonance mammography adequate in the detection of breast cancer?
Marklund M; Moller JM; Burchard AJ; Bentzon N; Balslev E; Sletting S; Nolsoe CP
Acta Radiol; 2006 Jun; 47(5):446-53. PubMed ID: 16796304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. MR mammography in the pre-operative staging of breast cancer in patients with dense breast tissue: comparison with mammography and ultrasound.
Van Goethem M; Schelfout K; Dijckmans L; Van Der Auwera JC; Weyler J; Verslegers I; Biltjes I; De Schepper A
Eur Radiol; 2004 May; 14(5):809-16. PubMed ID: 14615904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. First experiences in screening women at high risk for breast cancer with MR imaging.
Tilanus-Linthorst MM; Obdeijn IM; Bartels KC; de Koning HJ; Oudkerk M
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2000 Sep; 63(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 11079159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
