176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32856177)
1. Radiographic scoliosis angle estimation: spline-based measurement reveals superior reliability compared to traditional COBB method.
Bernstein P; Metzler J; Weinzierl M; Seifert C; Kisel W; Wacker M
Eur Spine J; 2021 Mar; 30(3):676-685. PubMed ID: 32856177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automatic Cobb angle determination from radiographic images.
Sardjono TA; Wilkinson MH; Veldhuizen AG; van Ooijen PM; Purnama KE; Verkerke GJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Sep; 38(20):E1256-62. PubMed ID: 23797500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of a computer-aided method for measuring the Cobb angle on chest X-rays.
Pan Y; Chen Q; Chen T; Wang H; Zhu X; Fang Z; Lu Y
Eur Spine J; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3035-3043. PubMed ID: 31446493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A computer-aided Cobb angle measurement method and its reliability.
Zhang J; Lou E; Shi X; Wang Y; Hill DL; Raso JV; Le LH; Lv L
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):383-7. PubMed ID: 20124919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automated comprehensive Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis assessment using MVC-Net.
Wu H; Bailey C; Rasoulinejad P; Li S
Med Image Anal; 2018 Aug; 48():1-11. PubMed ID: 29803920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability of radiographic measures for infantile idiopathic scoliosis.
Corona J; Sanders JO; Luhmann SJ; Diab M; Vitale MG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(12):e86. PubMed ID: 22717838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional measurement of the Cobb angle in scoliosis.
Lechner R; Putzer D; Dammerer D; Liebensteiner M; Bach C; Thaler M
Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):957-962. PubMed ID: 27921155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of the smartphone for end vertebra selection in scoliosis.
Pepe M; Kocadal O; Iyigun A; Gunes Z; Aksahin E; Aktekin CN
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2017 Mar; 51(2):146-149. PubMed ID: 28077254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cobb Angle Measurement of Spine from X-Ray Images Using Convolutional Neural Network.
Horng MH; Kuok CP; Fu MJ; Lin CJ; Sun YN
Comput Math Methods Med; 2019; 2019():6357171. PubMed ID: 30996731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. W-Transformer: Accurate Cobb angles estimation by using a transformer-based hybrid structure.
Yao Y; Yu W; Gao Y; Dong J; Xiao Q; Huang B; Shi Z
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3246-3262. PubMed ID: 35194794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A reliability and validity study for different coronal angles using ultrasound imaging in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Brink RC; Wijdicks SPJ; Tromp IN; Schlösser TPC; Kruyt MC; Beek FJA; Castelein RM
Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):979-985. PubMed ID: 29056566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability analysis of Cobb angle measurements of congenital scoliosis using X-ray and 3D-CT images.
Tauchi R; Tsuji T; Cahill PJ; Flynn JM; Flynn JM; Glotzbecker M; El-Hawary R; Heflin JA; Imagama S; Joshi AP; Nohara A; Ramirez N; Roye DP; Saito T; Sawyer JR; Smith JT; Kawakami N
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Jan; 26(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 26377663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability analysis of a smartphone-aided measurement method for the Cobb angle of scoliosis.
Qiao J; Liu Z; Xu L; Wu T; Zheng X; Zhu Z; Zhu F; Qian B; Qiu Y
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jun; 25(4):E88-92. PubMed ID: 22237178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of manual versus automated measurement of Cobb angle in idiopathic scoliosis based on a deep learning keypoint detection technology.
Sun Y; Xing Y; Zhao Z; Meng X; Xu G; Hai Y
Eur Spine J; 2022 Aug; 31(8):1969-1978. PubMed ID: 34716822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical validation of coronal and sagittal spinal curve measurements based on three-dimensional vertebra vector parameters.
Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T
Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):960-8. PubMed ID: 23018164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variation in Cobb angle measurements in scoliosis.
Pruijs JE; Hageman MA; Keessen W; van der Meer R; van Wieringen JC
Skeletal Radiol; 1994 Oct; 23(7):517-20. PubMed ID: 7824978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of observer variation in conventional and three digital radiographic methods used in the evaluation of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Mok JM; Berven SH; Diab M; Hackbarth M; Hu SS; Deviren V
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(6):681-6. PubMed ID: 18344863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Variability in Cobb angle measurements using reformatted computerized tomography scans.
Adam CJ; Izatt MT; Harvey JR; Askin GN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1664-9. PubMed ID: 16025038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of Cobb angle measurement: endplate versus pedicle as bony landmarks for measurement: a statistical analysis.
Mehta SS; Modi HN; Srinivasalu S; Chen T; Suh SW; Yang JH; Song HR
J Pediatr Orthop; 2009; 29(7):749-54. PubMed ID: 20104157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-assisted algorithms improve reliability of King classification and Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis.
Stokes IA; Aronsson DD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Mar; 31(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 16540871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
