173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32856177)
21. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools.
Gstoettner M; Sekyra K; Walochnik N; Winter P; Wachter R; Bach CM
Eur Spine J; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1587-92. PubMed ID: 17549526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Measurement of scoliosis Cobb angle by end vertebra tilt angle method.
Wang J; Zhang J; Xu R; Chen TG; Zhou KS; Zhang HH
J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Sep; 13(1):223. PubMed ID: 30180899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Accurate automated Cobb angles estimation using multi-view extrapolation net.
Wang L; Xu Q; Leung S; Chung J; Chen B; Li S
Med Image Anal; 2019 Dec; 58():101542. PubMed ID: 31473518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. VLTENet: A Deep-Learning-Based Vertebra Localization and Tilt Estimation Network for Automatic Cobb Angle Estimation.
Zou L; Guo L; Zhang R; Ni L; Chen Z; He X; Wang J
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2023 Jun; 27(6):3002-3013. PubMed ID: 37030726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Automatic Cobb measurement of scoliosis based on fuzzy Hough Transform with vertebral shape prior.
Zhang J; Lou E; Le LH; Hill DL; Raso JV; Wang Y
J Digit Imaging; 2009 Oct; 22(5):463-72. PubMed ID: 18516643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Reliability assessment of Cobb angle measurements using manual and digital methods.
Tanure MC; Pinheiro AP; Oliveira AS
Spine J; 2010 Sep; 10(9):769-74. PubMed ID: 20359959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Reliability of radiographic parameters in neuromuscular scoliosis.
Gupta MC; Wijesekera S; Sossan A; Martin L; Vogel LC; Boakes JL; Lerman JA; McDonald CM; Betz RR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):691-5. PubMed ID: 17413476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Automatic Cobb angle measurement method based on vertebra segmentation by deep learning.
Zhao Y; Zhang J; Li H; Gu X; Li Z; Zhang S
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2022 Aug; 60(8):2257-2269. PubMed ID: 35678952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The measurement of Cobb angle based on spine X-ray images using multi-scale convolutional neural network.
Liu J; Yuan C; Sun X; Sun L; Dong H; Peng Y
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2021 Sep; 44(3):809-821. PubMed ID: 34251603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Reliability analysis for manual measurement of coronal plane deformity in adolescent scoliosis. Are 30 x 90 cm plain films better than digitized small films?
De Carvalho A; Vialle R; Thomsen L; Amzallag J; Cluzel G; le Pointe HD; Mary P
Eur Spine J; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1615-20. PubMed ID: 17619912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Automated Adolescence Scoliosis Detection Using Augmented U-Net With Non-square Kernels.
Wu Y; Namdar K; Chen C; Hosseinpour S; Shroff M; Doria AS; Khalvati F
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2023 Nov; 74(4):667-675. PubMed ID: 36949410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. An integrative framework for 3D cobb angle measurement on CT images.
Huo X; Tan JQ; Qian J; Cheng L; Jing JH; Shao K; Li BN
Comput Biol Med; 2017 Mar; 82():111-118. PubMed ID: 28183004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reliability and accuracy analysis of a new semiautomatic radiographic measurement software in adult scoliosis.
Aubin CE; Bellefleur C; Joncas J; de Lanauze D; Kadoury S; Blanke K; Parent S; Labelle H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 May; 36(12):E780-90. PubMed ID: 21224755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reliability of a novel Cobb protractor for measuring the Cobb angle of radiograph in scoliosis.
Wu G; Wang H; Ding R; Xue XH; Wu ZH; Qiu GX
Chin Med Sci J; 2015 Mar; 30(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 25837355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Measuring procedures to determine the Cobb angle in idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review.
Langensiepen S; Semler O; Sobottke R; Fricke O; Franklin J; Schönau E; Eysel P
Eur Spine J; 2013 Nov; 22(11):2360-71. PubMed ID: 23443679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Accuracy and repeatability of a new method for measuring scoliosis curvature.
He JW; Yan ZH; Liu J; Yu ZK; Wang XY; Bai GH; Ye XJ; Zhang X
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(9):E323-9. PubMed ID: 19531987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Estimation of spinal deformity in scoliosis from torso surface cross sections.
Jaremko JL; Poncet P; Ronsky J; Harder J; Dansereau J; Labelle H; Zernicke RF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jul; 26(14):1583-91. PubMed ID: 11462091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Is There Asymmetry Between the Concave and Convex Pedicles in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis? A CT Investigation.
Davis CM; Grant CA; Pearcy MJ; Askin GN; Labrom RD; Izatt MT; Adam CJ; Little JP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):884-893. PubMed ID: 27900714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. MPF-net: An effective framework for automated cobb angle estimation.
Zhang K; Xu N; Guo C; Wu J
Med Image Anal; 2022 Jan; 75():102277. PubMed ID: 34753020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Interobserver variability using a commercially available system of archived digital radiography with integrated computer-assisted measurements for scoliosis Cobb angles.
Hardesty CK; Aronson J; Aronson EA; Ranade AS; McCracken CW; Nick TG; Cordell CL
J Pediatr Orthop; 2013 Mar; 33(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 23389571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
