These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32856177)

  • 61. Convolutional Neural Network to Segment Laminae on 3D Ultrasound Spinal Images to Assist Cobb Angle Measurement.
    Wong J; Reformat M; Parent E; Lou E
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2022 Apr; 50(4):401-412. PubMed ID: 35201548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Applying Machine Learning and Point-Set Registration to Automatically Measure the Severity of Spinal Curvature on Radiographs.
    Wong J; Reformat M; Lou E
    IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med; 2024; 12():151-161. PubMed ID: 38089001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Development and validation of AI-based automatic measurement of coronal Cobb angles in degenerative scoliosis using sagittal lumbar MRI.
    van der Graaf JW; van Hooff ML; van Ginneken B; Huisman M; Rutten M; Lamers D; Lessmann N; de Kleuver M
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38383922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Intra- and Interobserver Reliability of the Cobb Angle-Vertebral Rotation Angle-Spinous Process Angle for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.
    Chan AC; Morrison DG; Nguyen DV; Hill DL; Parent E; Lou EH
    Spine Deform; 2014 May; 2(3):168-175. PubMed ID: 27927414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Correlation between Cobb angle, spinous process angle (SPA) and apical vertebrae rotation (AVR) on posteroanterior radiographs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
    Morrison DG; Chan A; Hill D; Parent EC; Lou EH
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Feb; 24(2):306-12. PubMed ID: 25412836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Validity and reliability of active shape models for the estimation of cobb angle in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Allen S; Parent E; Khorasani M; Hill DL; Lou E; Raso JV
    J Digit Imaging; 2008 Jun; 21(2):208-18. PubMed ID: 17340228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Three-dimensional measurement of wedged scoliotic vertebrae and intervertebral disks.
    Aubin CE; Dansereau J; Petit Y; Parent F; de Guise JA; Labelle H
    Eur Spine J; 1998; 7(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 9548361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Clinical Application of Automatic Assessment of Scoliosis Cobb Angle Based on Deep Learning.
    Ni L; Zhang Z; Zou L; Wang J; Guo L; Qian W; Xu L; Xu K; Zeng Y
    Curr Med Imaging; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38415463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Comparison of spinal curvature parameters as determined by the ZEBRIS spine examination method and the Cobb method in children with scoliosis.
    Takács M; Orlovits Z; Jáger B; Kiss RM
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200245. PubMed ID: 29985957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Relationship between Quantec measurement and Cobb angle in patients with idiopathic scoliosis.
    Thometz JG; Lamdan R; Liu XC; Lyon R
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2000; 20(4):512-6. PubMed ID: 10912610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The Comparison of Convolutional Neural Networks and the Manual Measurement of Cobb Angle in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.
    Huang X; Luo M; Liu L; Wu D; You X; Deng Z; Xiu P; Yang X; Zhou C; Feng G; Wang L; Zhou Z; Fan J; He M; Gao Z; Pu L; Wu Z; Zhou Z; Song Y; Huang S
    Global Spine J; 2024 Jan; 14(1):159-168. PubMed ID: 35622711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Conquering the Cobb Angle: A Deep Learning Algorithm for Automated, Hardware-Invariant Measurement of Cobb Angle on Radiographs in Patients with Scoliosis.
    Suri A; Tang S; Kargilis D; Taratuta E; Kneeland BJ; Choi G; Agarwal A; Anabaraonye N; Xu W; Parente JB; Terry A; Kalluri A; Song K; Rajapakse CS
    Radiol Artif Intell; 2023 Jul; 5(4):e220158. PubMed ID: 37529207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Validity and reliability of active shape models for the estimation of Cobb angles in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Hill D; Allen S; Parent E; Khorasani M; Lou E; Raso J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 123():207-12. PubMed ID: 17108428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Centroid method: reliable method to determine the coronal curvature of scoliosis: a case control study comparing with the Cobb method.
    Hong JY; Suh SW; Modi HN; Hur CY; Song HR; Ryu JH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):E855-61. PubMed ID: 21289563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Reliability of end, neutral, and stable vertebrae identification in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Potter BK; Rosner MK; Lehman RA; Polly DW; Schroeder TM; Kuklo TR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1658-63. PubMed ID: 16025037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Is radiation-free diagnostic monitoring of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis feasible using upright positional magnetic resonance imaging?
    Diefenbach C; Lonner BS; Auerbach JD; Bharucha N; Dean LE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Apr; 38(7):576-80. PubMed ID: 23324938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Comparison of disc and vertebral wedging between patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and Chiari malformation-associated scoliosis.
    Wang S; Qiu Y; Ma W; Wang B; Yu Y; Qian B; Zhu Z; Zhu F; Sun X
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jul; 25(5):277-84. PubMed ID: 21617568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Correlation of radiographic, clinical, and patient assessment of shoulder balance following fusion versus nonfusion of the proximal thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Kuklo TR; Lenke LG; Graham EJ; Won DS; Sweet FA; Blanke KM; Bridwell KH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Sep; 27(18):2013-20. PubMed ID: 12634561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. A Semi-Automatic Algorithm for Estimating Cobb Angle.
    A S; H P; A Z; B P
    J Biomed Phys Eng; 2019 Jun; 9(3):317-326. PubMed ID: 31341877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Reexamination of the Cobb and Ferguson angles: bigger is not always better.
    Stokes IA; Aronson DD; Ronchetti PJ; Labelle H; Dansereau J
    J Spinal Disord; 1993 Aug; 6(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 8219547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.