These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32856326)

  • 1. Association between deficient cesarean delivery scar and cesarean scar syndrome.
    Dosedla E; Gál P; Calda P
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2020 Nov; 48(9):538-543. PubMed ID: 32856326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes of Laparoscopic Treatment in Women with Cesarean Scar Syndrome.
    Dosedla E; Calda P
    Med Sci Monit; 2017 Aug; 23():4061-4066. PubMed ID: 28829760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position.
    Wang CB; Chiu WW; Lee CY; Sun YL; Lin YH; Tseng CJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jul; 34(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 19565535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Emerging Manifestations of Cesarean Scar Defect in Reproductive-aged Women.
    Tulandi T; Cohen A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):893-902. PubMed ID: 27393285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The association of endometrial closure during cesarean section to the risk of developing uterine scar defect: a randomized control trial.
    Mohr-Sasson A; Castel E; Dadon T; Brandt A; Etinger R; Cohen A; Zajicek M; Haas J; Mashiach R
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 May; 309(5):2063-2070. PubMed ID: 38498161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hysterotomy level at Cesarean section and occurrence of large scar defects: a randomized single-blind trial.
    Vikhareva O; Rickle GS; Lavesson T; Nedopekina E; Brandell K; Salvesen KÅ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 53(4):438-442. PubMed ID: 30484920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Morphology of the cesarean section scar in the non-pregnant uterus after one elective cesarean section.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
    Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(4):174-179. PubMed ID: 28509317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [UTERINE SCAR DEFECT IN WOMEN AFTER CESAREAN SECTION - ULTRASOUND AND HYSTEROSCOPIC DIAGNOSI.].
    Ganovska A; Kovachev S
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2016; 55 Suppl 2():9-14. PubMed ID: 29470866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of cesarean scar after single- and double-layer hysterotomy closure: a prospective cross-sectional study.
    Tekiner NB; Çetin BA; Türkgeldi LS; Yılmaz G; Polat İ; Gedikbaşı A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 May; 297(5):1137-1143. PubMed ID: 29397441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pilot study of MRI/ultrasound fusion imaging in postpartum assessment of Cesarean section scar.
    Bolten K; Fischer T; Bender YY; Diederichs G; Thomas A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 50(4):520-526. PubMed ID: 27804175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hydrosonographic assessment of the effects of 2 different suturing techniques on healing of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery.
    Sevket O; Ates S; Molla T; Ozkal F; Uysal O; Dansuk R
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Jun; 125(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 24680843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical importance of appearance of cesarean hysterotomy scar at transvaginal ultrasonography in nonpregnant women.
    Vikhareva Osser O; Valentin L
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 117(3):525-532. PubMed ID: 21343754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gynecological and postpartum ultrasonography of cesarean uterine scar defects: a pictorial essay.
    El Agwany AS
    J Ultrasound; 2020 Dec; 23(4):613-619. PubMed ID: 31482293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single versus double-layer uterine closure at cesarean: impact on lower uterine segment thickness at next pregnancy.
    Vachon-Marceau C; Demers S; Bujold E; Roberge S; Gauthier RJ; Pasquier JC; Girard M; Chaillet N; Boulvain M; Jastrow N
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):65.e1-65.e5. PubMed ID: 28263751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Channel-like 360° Isthmocele Treatment with a 16F Mini-Resectoscope: A Step-by-step Technique.
    Casadio P; Gubbini G; Morra C; Franchini M; Paradisi R; Seracchioli R
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(7):1229-1230. PubMed ID: 31059782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination.
    Osser OV; Jokubkiene L; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jul; 34(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 19499514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective Evaluation of the Ultrasound Signs Proposed for the Description of Uterine Niche in Nonpregnant Women.
    Feldman N; Maymon R; Jauniaux E; Manoach D; Mor M; Marczak E; Melcer Y
    J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Apr; 41(4):917-923. PubMed ID: 34196967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determination of Isthmocele Using a Foley Catheter During Laparoscopic Repair of Cesarean Scar Defect.
    Akdemir A; Sahin C; Ari SA; Ergenoglu M; Ulukus M; Karadadas N
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):21-22. PubMed ID: 28602788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopic Resection of Post-Cesarean Section Scar Uterine Cyst.
    Jan H; Ghai V
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 26(2):358-359. PubMed ID: 29704677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrasound evaluation of Cesarean scar after single- and double-layer uterotomy closure: a cohort study.
    Glavind J; Madsen LD; Uldbjerg N; Dueholm M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Aug; 42(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 23288683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.