These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3285665)

  • 1. Mammographic parenchymal pattern and breast cancer risk: a critical appraisal of the evidence.
    Goodwin PJ; Boyd NF
    Am J Epidemiol; 1988 Jun; 127(6):1097-108. PubMed ID: 3285665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The mammographic image of benign breast diseases].
    Friedrich M
    Gynakologe; 1989 Aug; 22(4):230-7. PubMed ID: 2676758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mammographic parenchymal patterns and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women.
    Horwitz RI; Lamas AM; Peck D
    Am J Med; 1984 Oct; 77(4):621-4. PubMed ID: 6486138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiographic microcalcification and parenchymal patterns as indicators of histologic "high-risk" benign breast disease.
    Bartow SA; Pathak DR; Mettler FA
    Cancer; 1990 Oct; 66(8):1721-5. PubMed ID: 2208027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Mammography: experience in a university hospital].
    Marqués BJ
    Bol Asoc Med P R; 1983 Jan; 75(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 6087839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Calcifications visible in mammographic examination as a diagnostic problem].
    Urbanowicz Z; Witkowska J; Król J
    Ginekol Pol; 1996 Jul; 67(7):366-9. PubMed ID: 9139000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study.
    Wolfe JN; Saftlas AF; Salane M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Jun; 148(6):1087-92. PubMed ID: 3495132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Improved classification of x-ray images of the breast parenchyma].
    Berzin SA; Demidov SM; Glushko LS; Merkulov EV; Samanov VS
    Vopr Onkol; 1991; 37(4):491-4. PubMed ID: 1887649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship of "high risk" mammographic patterns to histological risk factors for development of cancer in the human breast.
    Arthur JE; Ellis IO; Flowers C; Roebuck E; Elston CW; Blamey RW
    Br J Radiol; 1990 Nov; 63(755):845-9. PubMed ID: 2252976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Specific features of mammographic visualization of "small" breast tumors developing on the background of fibrocystic disease].
    Bukharin DG; Velichko SA; Slonimskaia EM; Frolova IG; Luneva SV; Garbukov EIu; Doroshenko AV
    Vopr Onkol; 2011; 57(5):664-7. PubMed ID: 22238940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relationship of background mammographic pattern to hormone dependency in breast cancer.
    Hinton CP; Williams MR; Roebuck EJ; Blamey RW; Glaves J; Nicholson RI; Griffiths K
    Br J Surg; 1984 May; 71(5):357-9. PubMed ID: 6722463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of the epidemiology of atypical hyperplasia of the breast epithelium and mammographic parenchymal densities.
    Lee-Han HW; Jensen HM; Cooke G; Miller AB; Boyd NF
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 1993 Nov; 2 Suppl 3():33-40. PubMed ID: 8298450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast mammographic pattern: a concatenation of confounding and breast cancer risk factors.
    Bartow SA; Pathak DR; Mettler FA; Key CR; Pike MC
    Am J Epidemiol; 1995 Oct; 142(8):813-9. PubMed ID: 7572957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screening mammography, sonography of dense fibrocystic breast tissue.
    Fajardo LL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Dec; 181(6):1715. PubMed ID: 14627602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective study of mammographic parenchymal patterns and risk of breast cancer.
    Gravelle IH; Bulstrode JC; Bulbrook RD; Wang DY; Allen D; Hayward JL
    Br J Radiol; 1986 May; 59(701):487-91. PubMed ID: 3708251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mammographic parenchymal pattern and the risk of breast cancer.
    Wilkinson E; Clopton C; Gordonson J; Green R; Hill A; Pike MC
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1977 Nov; 59(5):1397-400. PubMed ID: 909098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Limitations of mammography in Chinese females.
    Alagaratnam TT; Wong J
    Clin Radiol; 1985 Mar; 36(2):175-7. PubMed ID: 4064496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) helpful in differentiating diabetic mastopathy from breast carcinoma?
    Travieso Aja MD; Santana López G; Rodríguez Rodríguez M; Luzardo OP
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Oct; 60(5):639-641. PubMed ID: 27029715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. False-positive mammographic imaging of a breast implant.
    Cucin R; Bard R
    N Y State J Med; 1993 Feb; 93(2):151-2. PubMed ID: 8455835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comprehensive radiographic diagnosis of breast cancer].
    Zaĭtsev AN; Vesnin AG; Semiglazov VF; Orlov AA; Chernomordikova MF; Chebykin IA
    Vopr Onkol; 1996; 42(6):58-60. PubMed ID: 9123904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.