These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32856743)
1. Full-Crown Versus Endocrown Approach: A 3D-Analysis of Both Restorations and the Effect of Ferrule and Restoration Material. Tribst JPM; Dal Piva AMO; de Jager N; Bottino MA; de Kok P; Kleverlaan CJ J Prosthodont; 2021 Apr; 30(4):335-344. PubMed ID: 32856743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical Assessment of Restored Mandibular Molar by Endocrown in Comparison to a Glass Fiber Post-Retained Conventional Crown: 3D Finite Element Analysis. Helal MA; Wang Z J Prosthodont; 2019 Dec; 28(9):988-996. PubMed ID: 29067737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endocrown restorations: Influence of dental remnant and restorative material on stress distribution. Tribst JPM; Dal Piva AMO; Madruga CFL; Valera MC; Borges ALS; Bresciani E; de Melo RM Dent Mater; 2018 Oct; 34(10):1466-1473. PubMed ID: 29935769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical behavior and Weibull survival of CAD-CAM endocrowns with different marginal designs: A 3D finite element analysis. AboElhassan RG; Watts DC; Alamoush RA; Elraggal A Dent Mater; 2024 Feb; 40(2):227-235. PubMed ID: 37977990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 3D-Finite element analysis of molars restored with endocrowns and posts during masticatory simulation. Dejak B; Młotkowski A Dent Mater; 2013 Dec; 29(12):e309-17. PubMed ID: 24157244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars using different preparation designs and CAD/CAM materials. Pedrollo Lise D; Van Ende A; De Munck J; Umeda Suzuki TY; Cardoso Vieira LC; Van Meerbeek B J Dent; 2017 Apr; 59():54-61. PubMed ID: 28214537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of mvM stress of inlays, onlays and endocrowns made from various materials and their bonding with molars in a computer simulation of mastication - FEA. Dejak B; Młotkowski A Dent Mater; 2020 Jul; 36(7):854-864. PubMed ID: 32473834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of Adhesive Core Buildup Designs on the Resistance of Endodontically Treated Molars Restored With Lithium Disilicate CAD/CAM Crowns. Carvalho AO; Bruzi G; Anderson RE; Maia HP; Giannini M; Magne P Oper Dent; 2016; 41(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 26266647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Strength comparison of anterior teeth restored with ceramic endocrowns vs custom-made post and cores. Dejak B; Młotkowski A J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Apr; 62(2):171-176. PubMed ID: 28886951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Features of fracture of prosthetic tooth-endocrown constructions by means of acoustic emission analysis. Skalskyi V; Makeev V; Stankevych O; Pavlychko R Dent Mater; 2018 Mar; 34(3):e46-e55. PubMed ID: 29409675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preparation Ferrule Design Effect on Endocrown Failure Resistance. Einhorn M; DuVall N; Wajdowicz M; Brewster J; Roberts H J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e237-e242. PubMed ID: 28985446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rehabilitation of severely-destructed endodontically treated premolar teeth with novel endocrown system: Biomechanical behavior assessment through 3D finite element and in vitro analyses. Shams A; Elsherbini M; Elsherbiny AA; Özcan M; Sakrana AA J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Feb; 126():105031. PubMed ID: 34922296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of margin design and restorative material on the stress distribution of endocrowns: a 3D finite element analysis. Zheng Z; Sun J; Jiang L; Wu Y; He J; Ruan W; Yan W BMC Oral Health; 2022 Feb; 22(1):30. PubMed ID: 35120525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of Restoration Height and Masticatory Load Orientation on Ceramic Endocrowns. da Fonseca GF; Dal Piva AM; Tribst JP; Borges AL J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1052-1057. PubMed ID: 30287703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical behavior of endocrown restorations with different CAD-CAM materials: A 3D finite element and in vitro analysis. Zheng Z; He Y; Ruan W; Ling Z; Zheng C; Gai Y; Yan W J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):890-899. PubMed ID: 32471627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Endocrown Biomechanical Response According to Different Pulp Chamber Extension Angles and Filling Materials. Tribst JPM; Lo Giudice R; Dos Santos AFC; Borges ALS; Silva-Concílio LR; Amaral M; Lo Giudice G Materials (Basel); 2021 Mar; 14(5):. PubMed ID: 33803194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of molars with thin-walled prosthetic crowns made of various materials. Dejak B; Młotkowski A; Langot C Dent Mater; 2012 Apr; 28(4):433-41. PubMed ID: 22209573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Load fatigue of teeth with different ferrule lengths, restored with fiber posts, composite resin cores, and all-ceramic crowns. Ma PS; Nicholls JI; Junge T; Phillips KM J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 19782825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of cement thickness and bonding on the failure loads of CAD/CAM ceramic crowns: multi-physics FEA modeling and monotonic testing. May LG; Kelly JR; Bottino MA; Hill T Dent Mater; 2012 Aug; 28(8):e99-109. PubMed ID: 22595741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative Finite Element Analysis of Endocrowns and Traditional Restorations for Endodontically Treated Mandibular First Molars. Al Qahtani WMS Med Sci Monit; 2023 Nov; 29():e941314. PubMed ID: 37941316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]