131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32857049)
1. Comparison of the antimicrobial properties of charcoal-infused and non-charcoal-infused toothbrushes: an in vitro study.
Daniel RA; Veena HR; Chaitra KR; Shubha P
Gen Dent; 2020; 68(5):51-55. PubMed ID: 32857049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Bacterial Contamination and Antibacterial Efficacy in Bristles of Charcoal Toothbrushes versus Noncharcoal Toothbrushes: A Microbiological Study.
Thamke MV; Beldar A; Thakkar P; Murkute S; Ranmare V; Hudwekar A
Contemp Clin Dent; 2018; 9(3):463-467. PubMed ID: 30166845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Plaque Removal and Wear between Charcoal Infused Bristle and Nylon Bristle Toothbrushes: A Randomized Clinical Crossover Study.
Kini V; Yadav S; Rijhwani JA; Farooqui A; Joshi AA; Phad SG
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Mar; 20(3):377-384. PubMed ID: 31204332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Toothbrush bristle wear and adherence of Streptococcus mutans.
Goldsmith RN; Shey Z; Houpt MI; Fine D; Schreiner H; Greenberg B
Pediatr Dent; 2007; 29(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 17688023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An in vitro comparison of antimicrobial toothbrushes.
Hamal JD; Hensley DM; Maller SC; Palazzolo DJ; Vandewalle KS
Gen Dent; 2014; 62(6):e24-7. PubMed ID: 25369397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An antimicrobial effect from silver-coated toothbrush heads.
Al-Ahmad A; Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad M; Deimling D; Jaser C; Pelz K; Wittmer A; Ratka-Krüger P
Am J Dent; 2010 Oct; 23(5):251-4. PubMed ID: 21207790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The efficacy of chlorhexidine spray vs mouthwash in the microbial contamination of child toothbrushes.
Ayşegül O; Elgin IE; Gulcin A; Nedim S
J Dent Child (Chic); 2007; 74(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 18482510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microbial contamination of toothbrushes with different principles of filament anchoring.
Wetzel WE; Schaumburg C; Ansari F; Kroeger T; Sziegoleit A
J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Jun; 136(6):758-65; quiz 806. PubMed ID: 16022040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Antimicrobial Efficacy of Charcoal vs. Non-charcoal Toothbrushes: A Randomized Controlled Study.
AlDhawi RZ; AlNaqa NH; Tashkandi OE; Gamal AT; AlShammery HF; Eltom SM
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2020; 10(6):719-723. PubMed ID: 33437704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness of Different Bristle Designs of Toothbrushes and Periodontal Status among Fixed Orthodontic Patients: A Double-blind Crossover Design.
Naik SP; Punathil S; Shetty P; Jayanti I; Jalaluddin M; Avijeeta A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Feb; 19(2):150-155. PubMed ID: 29422463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microbial contamination of power toothbrushes: a comparison of solid-head versus hollow-head designs.
Morris DW; Goldschmidt M; Keene H; Cron SG
J Dent Hyg; 2014 Aug; 88(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 25134956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Effect of different kinds of toothbrushes on toothbrushing pressure and plaque removal in the scrubbing method of toothbrushing (5). Toothbrushes with nylon bristles arranged in different lengths along the toothbrush shank and with different types of toothbrush bristle tip].
Fukushima M; Kurihara K; Kurogome J; Inadama K; Yageta A; Shoji Y; Suzuki J; Watanabe I; Shiono M; Watanabe T
Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai Kaishi; 1989 Dec; 31(4):1197-206. PubMed ID: 2489554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the bristle end-rounding patterns of children's toothbrushes using scanning electron microscopy and stereomicroscopy.
Lee HS; Jung HI; Kang SM; Kim HE; Kim BI
Int J Dent Hyg; 2017 May; 15(2):120-127. PubMed ID: 26376737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Catalogue of tooth brush head designs.
Voelker MA; Bayne SC; Liu Y; Walker MP
J Dent Hyg; 2013 Jun; 87(3):118-33. PubMed ID: 23986328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of an antimicrobial additive to toothbrushes on residual periodontal pathogens.
Goldschmidt MC; Warren DP; Keene HJ; Tate WH; Gowda C
J Clin Dent; 2004; 15(3):66-70. PubMed ID: 15688961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the contamination and disinfection methods of toothbrushes used by 24- to 48-month-old children.
Nelson-Filho P; Faria G; da Silva RA; Rossi MA; Ito IY
J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(3):152-8. PubMed ID: 17367032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Viability of Streptococcus mutans toothbrush bristles.
Saravia ME; Nelson-Filho P; da Silva RA; Faria G; Rossi MA; Ito IY
J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 18505645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro evaluation of the retention of three species of pathogenic microorganisms by three different types of toothbrush.
Bunetel L; Tricot-Doleux S; Agnani G; Bonnaure-Mallet M
Oral Microbiol Immunol; 2000 Oct; 15(5):313-6. PubMed ID: 11154423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of microbial contamination of toothbrush head: an in vitro study.
Karibasappa GN; Nagesh L; Sujatha BK
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 21525668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nano-enabled, antimicrobial toothbrushes - How physical and chemical properties relate to antibacterial capabilities.
Johnson CR; Tran MN; Michelitsch LM; Abraham S; Hu J; Gray KA; Hartmann EM
J Hazard Mater; 2020 Sep; 396():122445. PubMed ID: 32298860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
