474 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32857148)
1. Assessment of Variation in Cesarean Delivery Rates Between Public and Private Health Facilities in India From 2005 to 2016.
Bhatia M; Banerjee K; Dixit P; Dwivedi LK
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Aug; 3(8):e2015022. PubMed ID: 32857148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High prevalence of cesarean section births in private sector health facilities- analysis of district level household survey-4 (DLHS-4) of India.
Singh P; Hashmi G; Swain PK
BMC Public Health; 2018 May; 18(1):613. PubMed ID: 29747609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trends, Regional Variations, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Cesarean Births in India, 2010-2016.
Guilmoto CZ; Dumont A
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Mar; 2(3):e190526. PubMed ID: 30901040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variations in the prevalence of caesarean section deliveries in India between 2016 and 2021 - an analysis of Tamil Nadu and Chhattisgarh.
Neethi Mohan V; Shirisha P; Vaidyanathan G; Muraleedharan VR
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2023 Aug; 23(1):622. PubMed ID: 37649006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Length of stay after childbirth in India: a comparative study of public and private health institutions.
Kumar P; Dhillon P
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Mar; 20(1):181. PubMed ID: 32293327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prevalence and determinants of caesarean section in private and public health facilities in underserved South Asian communities: cross-sectional analysis of data from Bangladesh, India and Nepal.
Neuman M; Alcock G; Azad K; Kuddus A; Osrin D; More NS; Nair N; Tripathy P; Sikorski C; Saville N; Sen A; Colbourn T; Houweling TA; Seward N; Manandhar DS; Shrestha BP; Costello A; Prost A
BMJ Open; 2014 Dec; 4(12):e005982. PubMed ID: 25550293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Out-of-pocket expenditure and correlates of caesarean births in public and private health centres in India.
Mohanty SK; Panda BK; Khan PK; Behera P
Soc Sci Med; 2019 Mar; 224():45-57. PubMed ID: 30738236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Out of pocket expenditure and distress financing on cesarean delivery in India: evidence from NFHS-5.
Singh RR; Sharma A; Mohanty SK
BMC Health Serv Res; 2023 Sep; 23(1):966. PubMed ID: 37679706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors associated with cesarean delivery in public and private hospitals in a city of northeastern Brazil: a cross-sectional study.
Vieira GO; Fernandes LG; de Oliveira NF; Silva LR; Vieira Tde O
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Jun; 15():132. PubMed ID: 26043857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Regional Gradients in Institutional Cesarean Delivery Rates: Evidence from Five Countries in Asia.
Sepehri A; Guliani H
Birth; 2017 Mar; 44(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 27874197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of payment source and hospital type on rising cesarean section rates in Brazil, 1998 to 2008.
Hopkins K; de Lima Amaral EF; Mourão AN
Birth; 2014 Jun; 41(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 24684250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Utilization of the state led public private partnership program "Chiranjeevi Yojana" to promote facility births in Gujarat, India: a cross sectional community based study.
Yasobant S; Vora KS; Shewade HD; Annerstedt KS; Isaakidis P; Mavalankar DV; Dholakia NB; De Costa A
BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Jul; 16():266. PubMed ID: 27421254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does delivery in private hospitals contribute largely to Caesarean Section births? A path analysis using generalised structural equation modelling.
Sk R
PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0239649. PubMed ID: 33031397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Increasing trend of C-section deliveries in India: A comparative analysis between southern states and rest of India.
Sengupta A; Sabastin Sagayam M; Reja T
Sex Reprod Healthc; 2021 Jun; 28():100608. PubMed ID: 33652351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Institutional setting and wealth gradients in cesarean delivery rates: Evidence from six developing countries.
Sepehri A
Birth; 2018 Jun; 45(2):148-158. PubMed ID: 29314234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlates of C-section in Punjab: a disaggregated analysis at the level of rural-urban residential status and place of delivery.
Abbas F; Amir-Ud-Din R
Women Health; 2019 Oct; 59(9):997-1014. PubMed ID: 30894083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Going public: do risk and choice explain differences in caesarean birth rates between public and private places of birth in Australia?
Miller YD; Prosser SJ; Thompson R
Midwifery; 2012 Oct; 28(5):627-35. PubMed ID: 22877762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characteristics of private partners in Chiranjeevi Yojana, a public-private-partnership to promote institutional births in Gujarat, India - Lessons for universal health coverage.
Iyer V; Sidney K; Mehta R; Mavalankar D; De Costa A
PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185739. PubMed ID: 29040336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cesarean deliveries for medicaid patients: a comparison in public and private hospitals in Los Angeles county.
Gregory KD; Ramicone E; Chan L; Kahn KL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 180(5):1177-84. PubMed ID: 10329874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Are cesarean deliveries equitable in India: assessment using benefit incidence analysis.
Singh RR; Mishra S; Mohanty SK
BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 May; 22(1):670. PubMed ID: 35585584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
