These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32857204)

  • 1. Diffusion kurtosis imaging in evaluating gliomas: different region of interest selection methods on time efficiency, measurement repeatability, and diagnostic ability.
    Chu JP; Song YK; Tian YS; Qiu HS; Huang XH; Wang YL; Huang YQ; Zhao J
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):729-739. PubMed ID: 32857204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative analysis of the diffusion kurtosis imaging and diffusion tensor imaging in grading gliomas, predicting tumour cell proliferation and IDH-1 gene mutation status.
    Zhao J; Wang YL; Li XB; Hu MS; Li ZH; Song YK; Wang JY; Tian YS; Liu DW; Yan X; Jiang L; Yang ZY; Chu JP
    J Neurooncol; 2019 Jan; 141(1):195-203. PubMed ID: 30414095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis imaging derived maps may distinguish between low and high grade gliomas before surgery.
    Qi XX; Shi DF; Ren SX; Zhang SY; Li L; Li QC; Guan LM
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Apr; 28(4):1748-1755. PubMed ID: 29143940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic performance of gliomas grading and IDH status decoding A comparison between 3D amide proton transfer APT and four diffusion-weighted MRI models.
    Guo H; Liu J; Hu J; Zhang H; Zhao W; Gao M; Zhang Y; Yang G; Cui Y
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Dec; 56(6):1834-1844. PubMed ID: 35488516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic performance between MR amide proton transfer (APT) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in glioma grading and IDH mutation status prediction at 3 T.
    Xu Z; Ke C; Liu J; Xu S; Han L; Yang Y; Qian L; Liu X; Zheng H; Lv X; Wu Y
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Jan; 134():109466. PubMed ID: 33307459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of tissue heterogeneity using diffusion tensor and diffusion kurtosis imaging for grading gliomas.
    Raja R; Sinha N; Saini J; Mahadevan A; Rao KN; Swaminathan A
    Neuroradiology; 2016 Dec; 58(12):1217-1231. PubMed ID: 27796448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
    Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diffusion kurtosis imaging can efficiently assess the glioma grade and cellular proliferation.
    Jiang R; Jiang J; Zhao L; Zhang J; Zhang S; Yao Y; Yang S; Shi J; Shen N; Su C; Zhang J; Zhu W
    Oncotarget; 2015 Dec; 6(39):42380-93. PubMed ID: 26544514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Whole-Tumor Histogram Analysis of Multiple Diffusion Metrics for Glioma Genotyping.
    Gao A; Zhang H; Yan X; Wang S; Chen Q; Gao E; Qi J; Bai J; Zhang Y; Cheng J
    Radiology; 2022 Mar; 302(3):652-661. PubMed ID: 34874198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Feasibility of generalised diffusion kurtosis imaging approach for brain glioma grading.
    Pogosbekian EL; Pronin IN; Zakharova NE; Batalov AI; Turkin AM; Konakova TA; Maximov II
    Neuroradiology; 2021 Aug; 63(8):1241-1251. PubMed ID: 33410948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Comparative Study of 2 Different Segmentation Methods of ADC Histogram for Differentiation Genetic Subtypes in Lower-Grade Diffuse Gliomas.
    Liu D; Gao SX; Liao HF; Xu JM; Wen M
    Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():9549361. PubMed ID: 33062706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Apparent diffusion coefficient measurement in glioma: Influence of region-of-interest determination methods on apparent diffusion coefficient values, interobserver variability, time efficiency, and diagnostic ability.
    Han X; Suo S; Sun Y; Zu J; Qu J; Zhou Y; Chen Z; Xu J
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Mar; 45(3):722-730. PubMed ID: 27527072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diffusion kurtosis imaging as an imaging biomarker for predicting prognosis of the patients with high-grade gliomas.
    Wang X; Gao W; Li F; Shi W; Li H; Zeng Q
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Nov; 63():131-136. PubMed ID: 31425809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of diffuse glioma grade and proliferation activity by different diffusion-weighted-imaging models including diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and mean apparent propagator (MAP) MRI.
    Xie SH; Lang R; Li B; Zhao H; Wang P; He JL; Ma XY; Wu Q; Wang SY; Zhang HP; Gao Y; Wu JL
    Neuroradiology; 2023 Jan; 65(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 35835879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mean apparent propagator-MRI in evaluation of glioma grade, cellular proliferation, and IDH-1 gene mutation status.
    Sun Y; Su C; Deng K; Hu X; Xue Y; Jiang R
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Jun; 32(6):3744-3754. PubMed ID: 35076759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of two region-of-interest placement methods for histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps for glioma grading.
    Hieu ND; Hung ND; Hung ND; Hien MM; Anh DV; Dung LT
    Clin Ter; 2024; 175(3):128-136. PubMed ID: 38767069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vivo assessment of tumor heterogeneity in WHO 2016 glioma grades using diffusion kurtosis imaging: Diagnostic performance and improvement of feasibility in routine clinical practice.
    Hempel JM; Schittenhelm J; Bisdas S; Brendle C; Bender B; Bier G; Skardelly M; Tabatabai G; Castaneda Vega S; Ernemann U; Klose U
    J Neuroradiol; 2018 Feb; 45(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 28865921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis imaging estimates for in vivo assessment of 2016 WHO glioma grades: A cross-sectional observational study.
    Hempel JM; Schittenhelm J; Brendle C; Bender B; Bier G; Skardelly M; Tabatabai G; Castaneda Vega S; Ernemann U; Klose U
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Oct; 95():202-211. PubMed ID: 28987669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diffusion kurtosis imaging in the characterisation of rectal cancer: utilizing the most repeatable region-of-interest strategy for diffusion parameters on a 3T scanner.
    Sun Y; Xiao Q; Hu F; Fu C; Jia H; Yan X; Xin C; Cai S; Peng W; Wang X; Tong T; Gu Y
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Dec; 28(12):5211-5220. PubMed ID: 29797056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Developing a Predictive Grading Model for Children with Gliomas Based on Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Metrics: Accuracy and Clinical Correlations with Patient Survival.
    Voicu IP; Napolitano A; Caulo M; Dotta F; Piccirilli E; Vinci M; Diomedi-Camassei F; Lattavo L; Carboni A; Miele E; Cacchione A; Carai A; Tomà P; Mastronuzzi A; Colafati GS
    Cancers (Basel); 2022 Sep; 14(19):. PubMed ID: 36230701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.