These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32857532)

  • 1. Homophily Based on Few Attributes Can Impede Structural Balance.
    Górski PJ; Bochenina K; Hołyst JA; D'Souza RM
    Phys Rev Lett; 2020 Aug; 125(7):078302. PubMed ID: 32857532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Competition of Homophily and Popularity in Growing and Evolving Social Networks.
    Liu Y; Li L; Wang H; Sun C; Chen X; He J; Jiang Y
    Sci Rep; 2018 Oct; 8(1):15431. PubMed ID: 30337574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamics of social balance on networks.
    Antal T; Krapivsky PL; Redner S
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2005 Sep; 72(3 Pt 2):036121. PubMed ID: 16241529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monophily in social networks introduces similarity among friends-of-friends.
    Altenburger KM; Ugander J
    Nat Hum Behav; 2018 Apr; 2(4):284-290. PubMed ID: 30936539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Structural transition in social networks: The role of homophily.
    Murase Y; Jo HH; Török J; Kertész J; Kaski K
    Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):4310. PubMed ID: 30867537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Empirical Models of Social Learning in a Large, Evolving Network.
    Bener AB; Çağlayan B; Henry AD; Prałat P
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0160307. PubMed ID: 27701430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Homophily influences ranking of minorities in social networks.
    Karimi F; Génois M; Wagner C; Singer P; Strohmaier M
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jul; 8(1):11077. PubMed ID: 30038426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An agent based force vector model of social influence that predicts strong polarization in a connected world.
    Maclay GJ; Ahmad M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0259625. PubMed ID: 34784356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Building the community: Endogenous network formation, homophily and prosocial sorting among therapeutic community residents.
    Warren K; Campbell B; Cranmer S; De Leon G; Doogan N; Weiler M; Doherty F
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2020 Feb; 207():107773. PubMed ID: 31812853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Balance and fragmentation in societies with homophily and social balance.
    Pham TM; Alexander AC; Korbel J; Hanel R; Thurner S
    Sci Rep; 2021 Aug; 11(1):17188. PubMed ID: 34433848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A unified framework for link prediction based on non-negative matrix factorization with coupling multivariate information.
    Wang W; Tang M; Jiao P
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0208185. PubMed ID: 30496261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Social networks dynamics revealed by temporal analysis: An example in a non-human primate (Macaca sylvanus) in "La Forêt des Singes".
    Sosa S; Zhang P; Cabanes G
    Am J Primatol; 2017 Jun; 79(6):. PubMed ID: 28464245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modeling Echo Chambers and Polarization Dynamics in Social Networks.
    Baumann F; Lorenz-Spreen P; Sokolov IM; Starnini M
    Phys Rev Lett; 2020 Jan; 124(4):048301. PubMed ID: 32058741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Value homophily benefits cooperation but motivates employing incorrect social information.
    Rauwolf P; Mitchell D; Bryson JJ
    J Theor Biol; 2015 Feb; 367():246-261. PubMed ID: 25481838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Weighted Betweenness Preferential Attachment: A New Mechanism Explaining Social Network Formation and Evolution.
    Topirceanu A; Udrescu M; Marculescu R
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jul; 8(1):10871. PubMed ID: 30022079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multidimensional Homophily in Friendship Networks.
    Block P; Grund T
    Netw Sci (Camb Univ Press); 2014 Aug; 2(2):189-212. PubMed ID: 25525503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An experimental study of homophily in the adoption of health behavior.
    Centola D
    Science; 2011 Dec; 334(6060):1269-72. PubMed ID: 22144624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cumulative effects of triadic closure and homophily in social networks.
    Asikainen A; Iñiguez G; Ureña-Carrión J; Kaski K; Kivelä M
    Sci Adv; 2020 May; 6(19):eaax7310. PubMed ID: 32426484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamical models explaining social balance and evolution of cooperation.
    Traag VA; Van Dooren P; De Leenheer P
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e60063. PubMed ID: 23634204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Results from using a new dyadic-dependence model to analyze sociocentric physician networks.
    Paul S; Keating NL; Landon BE; O'Malley AJ
    Soc Sci Med; 2014 Sep; 117():67-75. PubMed ID: 25047711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.