These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32857772)
21. Competition between microorganisms for a single limiting resource with cell quota structure and spatial variation. Grover JP; Hsu SB; Wang FB J Math Biol; 2012 Apr; 64(5):713-43. PubMed ID: 21603941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Mechanistic links between cellular trade-offs, gene expression, and growth. Weiße AY; Oyarzún DA; Danos V; Swain PS Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Mar; 112(9):E1038-47. PubMed ID: 25695966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Complex dynamics of microbial competition in the gradostat. Gaki A; Theodorou A; Vayenas DV; Pavlou S J Biotechnol; 2009 Jan; 139(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 18809443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Coexistence under Hierarchical Resource Exploitation: The Role of the Qi M; DeMalach N; Dong Y; Zhang H; Sun T Am Nat; 2022 Aug; 200(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 35905401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Metabolic enzyme cost explains variable trade-offs between microbial growth rate and yield. Wortel MT; Noor E; Ferris M; Bruggeman FJ; Liebermeister W PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Feb; 14(2):e1006010. PubMed ID: 29451895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Competition in chemostat-type equations with two habitats. Nakaoka S; Takeuchi Y Math Biosci; 2006 May; 201(1-2):157-71. PubMed ID: 16448673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Microbial expansion-collision dynamics promote cooperation and coexistence on surfaces. Xu S; Van Dyken JD Evolution; 2018 Jan; 72(1):153-169. PubMed ID: 29134631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Coexistence of three competing microbial populations in a chemostat with periodically varying dilution rate. Lenas P; Pavlou S Math Biosci; 1995 Oct; 129(2):111-42. PubMed ID: 7549217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. OptCom: a multi-level optimization framework for the metabolic modeling and analysis of microbial communities. Zomorrodi AR; Maranas CD PLoS Comput Biol; 2012 Feb; 8(2):e1002363. PubMed ID: 22319433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Metabolic trade-offs and the maintenance of the fittest and the flattest. Beardmore RE; Gudelj I; Lipson DA; Hurst LD Nature; 2011 Apr; 472(7343):342-6. PubMed ID: 21441905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Enhanced production of heterologous proteins by a synthetic microbial community: Conditions and trade-offs. Mauri M; Gouzé JL; de Jong H; Cinquemani E PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Apr; 16(4):e1007795. PubMed ID: 32282794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. How flocculation can explain coexistence in the chemostat. Haegeman B; Rapaport A J Biol Dyn; 2008 Jan; 2(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 22876841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Trade-offs, temporal variation, and species coexistence in communities with intraguild predation. Amarasekare P Ecology; 2007 Nov; 88(11):2720-8. PubMed ID: 18051639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Predicting coexistence of plants subject to a tolerance-competition trade-off. Haegeman B; Sari T; Etienne RS J Math Biol; 2014 Jun; 68(7):1815-47. PubMed ID: 23728210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Trade-offs and coexistence in microbial microcosms. Bohannan BJ; Kerr B; Jessup CM; Hughes JB; Sandvik G Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2002 Aug; 81(1-4):107-15. PubMed ID: 12448710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Plasmid-bearing, plasmid-free organisms competing for two complementary nutrients in a chemostat. Hsu SB; Tzeng YH Math Biosci; 2002; 179(2):183-206. PubMed ID: 12208615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]