213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32858041)
1. An aryl hydrocarbon receptor from the caecilian Gymnopis multiplicata suggests low dioxin affinity in the ancestor of all three amphibian orders.
Kazzaz SA; Giani Tagliabue S; Franks DG; Denison MS; Hahn ME; Bonati L; Powell WH
Gen Comp Endocrinol; 2020 Dec; 299():113592. PubMed ID: 32858041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor from the Salamander Ambystoma mexicanum Exhibits Low Sensitivity to 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.
Shoots J; Fraccalvieri D; Franks DG; Denison MS; Hahn ME; Bonati L; Powell WH
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jun; 49(11):6993-7001. PubMed ID: 25941739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Specific ligand binding domain residues confer low dioxin responsiveness to AHR1β of Xenopus laevis.
Odio C; Holzman SA; Denison MS; Fraccalvieri D; Bonati L; Franks DG; Hahn ME; Powell WH
Biochemistry; 2013 Mar; 52(10):1746-54. PubMed ID: 23394719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Aryl hydrocarbon receptors in the frog Xenopus laevis: two AhR1 paralogs exhibit low affinity for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD).
Lavine JA; Rowatt AJ; Klimova T; Whitington AJ; Dengler E; Beck C; Powell WH
Toxicol Sci; 2005 Nov; 88(1):60-72. PubMed ID: 15958654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Molecular and functional characterization of a novel aryl hydrocarbon receptor isoform, AHR1β, in the chicken (Gallus gallus).
Lee JS; Iwabuchi K; Nomaru K; Nagahama N; Kim EY; Iwata H
Toxicol Sci; 2013 Dec; 136(2):450-66. PubMed ID: 23997109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In silico analysis of the interaction of avian aryl hydrocarbon receptors and dioxins to decipher isoform-, ligand-, and species-specific activations.
Hirano M; Hwang JH; Park HJ; Bak SM; Iwata H; Kim EY
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 49(6):3795-804. PubMed ID: 25692546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Responsiveness of a Xenopus laevis cell line to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands 6-formylindolo[3,2-b]carbazole (FICZ) and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD).
Laub LB; Jones BD; Powell WH
Chem Biol Interact; 2010 Jan; 183(1):202-11. PubMed ID: 19799885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative analysis of homology models of the AH receptor ligand binding domain: verification of structure-function predictions by site-directed mutagenesis of a nonfunctional receptor.
Fraccalvieri D; Soshilov AA; Karchner SI; Franks DG; Pandini A; Bonati L; Hahn ME; Denison MS
Biochemistry; 2013 Jan; 52(4):714-25. PubMed ID: 23286227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) homologue from the soft-shell clam, Mya arenaria: evidence that invertebrate AHR homologues lack 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and beta-naphthoflavone binding.
Butler RA; Kelley ML; Powell WH; Hahn ME; Van Beneden RJ
Gene; 2001 Oct; 278(1-2):223-34. PubMed ID: 11707340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An aryl hydrocarbon receptor repressor from Xenopus laevis: function, expression, and role in dioxin responsiveness during frog development.
Zimmermann AL; King EA; Dengler E; Scogin SR; Powell WH
Toxicol Sci; 2008 Jul; 104(1):124-34. PubMed ID: 18385208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Auto-induction mechanism of aryl hydrocarbon receptor 2 (AHR2) gene by TCDD-activated AHR1 and AHR2 in the red seabream (Pagrus major).
Bak SM; Iida M; Soshilov AA; Denison MS; Iwata H; Kim EY
Arch Toxicol; 2017 Jan; 91(1):301-312. PubMed ID: 27188387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. cDNA cloning and characterization of a high affinity aryl hydrocarbon receptor in a cetacean, the beluga, Delphinapterus leucas.
Jensen BA; Hahn ME
Toxicol Sci; 2001 Nov; 64(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 11606800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identification and functional characterization of two highly divergent aryl hydrocarbon receptors (AHR1 and AHR2) in the teleost Fundulus heteroclitus. Evidence for a novel subfamily of ligand-binding basic helix loop helix-Per-ARNT-Sim (bHLH-PAS) factors.
Karchner SI; Powell WH; Hahn ME
J Biol Chem; 1999 Nov; 274(47):33814-24. PubMed ID: 10559277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The tertiary structures of porcine AhR and ARNT proteins and molecular interactions within the TCDD/AhR/ARNT complex.
Orlowska K; Molcan T; Swigonska S; Sadowska A; Jablonska M; Nynca A; Jastrzebski JP; Ciereszko RE
J Mol Graph Model; 2016 Jun; 67():119-26. PubMed ID: 27288759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of the TCDD binding-fingerprint within the Ah receptor ligand binding domain by structurally driven mutagenesis and functional analysis.
Pandini A; Soshilov AA; Song Y; Zhao J; Bonati L; Denison MS
Biochemistry; 2009 Jun; 48(25):5972-83. PubMed ID: 19456125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The AHR1-ARNT1 dimerization pair is a major regulator of the response to natural ligands, but not to TCDD, in the chicken.
Koh DH; Hwang JH; Park JG; Song WS; Iwata H; Kim EY
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2020 Sep; 201():110835. PubMed ID: 32563159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The molecular basis for differential dioxin sensitivity in birds: role of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor.
Karchner SI; Franks DG; Kennedy SW; Hahn ME
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2006 Apr; 103(16):6252-7. PubMed ID: 16606854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Subfunctionalization of Paralogous Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptors from the Frog Xenopus Laevis: Distinct Target Genes and Differential Responses to Specific Agonists in a Single Cell Type.
Freeburg SH; Engelbrecht E; Powell WH
Toxicol Sci; 2017 Feb; 155(2):337-347. PubMed ID: 27994169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterization of the region of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor required for ligand dependency of transactivation using chimeric receptor between Drosophila and Mus musculus.
Kudo K; Takeuchi T; Murakami Y; Ebina M; Kikuchi H
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2009; 1789(6-8):477-86. PubMed ID: 19560568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. cDNA cloning and characterization of an aryl hydrocarbon receptor from the harbor seal (Phoca vitulina): a biomarker of dioxin susceptibility?
Kim EY; Hahn ME
Aquat Toxicol; 2002 Jul; 58(1-2):57-73. PubMed ID: 12062155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
