These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Reconstruction of Mandibular Contour Using Individualized High-Density Porous Polyethylene (Medpor Wang Y; Zhang Y; Zhang Z; Li X; Pan J; Li J Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2018 Feb; 42(1):118-125. PubMed ID: 29260271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contour Restoration of Over-Resected Mandibular Angle and Lower Border by Reduction Mandibuloplasty Using Three-Dimensional Planning and Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Custom-Made Titanium Implants. Woo JM; Baek SH; Kim JC; Choi JY J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 29(4):e340-e343. PubMed ID: 29481493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endoscopic-Assisted Forehead Augmentation with Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Patient-Specific Implant (PSI) for Aesthetic Considerations. Yan K; Wu Y; Xie Z; Yan S; Qiao C; Qu Y; Gao S; Shangguan W; Wu G Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2024 May; 48(10):1889-1898. PubMed ID: 38409347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of patient specific polyetheretherketone implants for reconstruction of maxillofacial deformities. Järvinen S; Suojanen J; Kormi E; Wilkman T; Kiukkonen A; Leikola J; Stoor P J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jul; 47(7):1072-1076. PubMed ID: 31103433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer-aided design and computer-aided modeling (CAD/CAM) generated surgical splints, cutting guides and custom-made implants: Which indications in orthognathic surgery? Scolozzi P Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Chir Orale; 2015 Dec; 116(6):343-9. PubMed ID: 26598243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Custom made onlay implants in peek in maxillofacial surgery: a volumetric study. Saponaro G; Doneddu P; Gasparini G; Staderini E; Boniello R; Todaro M; D'Amato G; Pelo S; Moro A Childs Nerv Syst; 2020 Feb; 36(2):385-391. PubMed ID: 31367783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Polyetheretherketone patient-specific implants (PPSI) for the reconstruction of two different mandibular contour deformities. Atef M; Mounir M; Shawky M; Mounir S; Gibaly A Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jun; 26(2):299-309. PubMed ID: 34328575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient-Specific Surgical Implants Made of 3D Printed PEEK: Material, Technology, and Scope of Surgical Application. Honigmann P; Sharma N; Okolo B; Popp U; Msallem B; Thieringer FM Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():4520636. PubMed ID: 29713642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical application of 3D-printed PEEK implants for repairing mandibular defects. Li Y; Li Z; Tian L; Li D; Lu B; Shi C; Niu Q; Liu F; Kong L; Zhang J J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2022 Aug; 50(8):621-626. PubMed ID: 35760658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Titanium and polyether ether ketone (PEEK) patient-specific sub-periosteal implants: two novel approaches for rehabilitation of the severely atrophic anterior maxillary ridge. Mounir M; Atef M; Abou-Elfetouh A; Hakam MM Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 May; 47(5):658-664. PubMed ID: 29183698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of cranial resection templates with 3D virtual planning and PEEK patient-specific implants: A 3 year follow-up. van de Vijfeijken SECM; Schreurs R; Dubois L; Becking AG; J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Apr; 47(4):542-547. PubMed ID: 30745010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Porous Polyethylene Implant as Aesthetic Complement in Orthognathic Surgery. da Silva de Menezes JD; Moura LB; Martins RP; Hochuli-Vieira E J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Nov; 27(8):e790-e791. PubMed ID: 28005826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histological and radiological evaluation of subcutaneous implants in mouse of a 3D-printable material (Fulcure 720) and experimental application in mandibular reconstruction. Megías Barrera J; García-Consuegra L; Novoa A; Costilla S; Junquera S; Ascani G J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Apr; 119(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 29128598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of Patient-Specific PEEK Implant for Aesthetic Considerations in Paranasal Augmentation. Zhang J; Li D; Liu Y; Zhang Z; Fan Y; Shi J; Liu S J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 33(8):e877-e880. PubMed ID: 35968952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simultaneous Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacture Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery and Mandibular Reconstruction Using Selective-Laser Sintered Titanium Implant. Hatamleh MM; Bhamrah G; Ryba F; Mack G; Huppa C J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 27(7):1810-1814. PubMed ID: 27548831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The degree of peri-implant osteolysis induced by PEEK, CoCrMo, and HXLPE wear particles: a study based on a porous Ti6Al4V implant in a rabbit model. Du Z; Zhu Z; Wang Y J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Jan; 13(1):23. PubMed ID: 29386035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient-Specific Facial Implants in Polyetheretherketone and Their Stability: A Preliminary Study. Saponaro G; Todaro M; Barbera G; Scivoletto G; Foresta E; Gasparini G; Moro A Ann Plast Surg; 2023 Jun; 90(6):564-567. PubMed ID: 36975101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]